Wolf Lieser

The changes that have occurred in these categories in the past 23 years demonstrate how ephemeral can be the tags that can differentiate the various aspects of digital art. The continuing trend towards innovation has hampered to some extent a reflection of the whole and has raised the question of whether technology may be getting art into a "black hole." Stewart Brand criticized in an article for WIRED magazine, 17 years ago, the speed with which the artists got recognition and lack of robustness of art based on the continuous search for the new: “How to get any kind of a culture aesthetics, foundation or continuity of works of art with mayflies longevity? " Today, the digital art is largely linked to the rule of the continuous new part, but it is also true that it also includes collection of careers of some artists and research on historical trends in this area(Bolter, 2006). …show more content…
This essay also attempted to provide a panoramic view under the influence of Wolf Lieser’s personal experience. In this case, the publisher (H. F. Ullmann) does not have as much weight as the previous ones, and it is the author's own path which gives a particular interest in this title. Lieser, connoisseur, and promoter of the pioneering artists’ work such as Manfred Mohr or Frieder Nake, focuses much of his book on the explorations that were conducted between 60 and 80. It explains in detail the work of algorithms and techniques such as printing plotter. It also presents issues and current practice, focusing on the contributions of artists represented in the gallery and therefore knows