Republican Party Vs Progressive Party Analysis

Improved Essays
In today 's American political system, voters find themselves confronted with two options. These two options being the ever conflicting platforms of the Democratic and Republican parties. Regardless of an individual voter 's personal views, they don 't have much choice in what happens to their country. Many call this choice of parties “picking from the lesser of two evils,” stating that no choice represents them. Public support of the parties is somewhat forced by lack of choice, clearly shown by the steady decline in voter turnout since the 1960s (DelReal). This unhappiness with the government is also demonstrated by a lack of satisfaction with congress, whose approval has dropped by almost 40% over the last ten years to a mere 28%("Congressional …show more content…
Taft and his rival Woodrow Wilson, the 1912 presidential election was leaning in the favor of the Republicans. This changed when the Republican Party decided to abandon a progressive platform and stick with conservative ideals. The decision prompted Roosevelt drop support for Taft, betraying not only his party but also their close friendship. Instead he chose to leave the Republican Party and form his own Progressive Party, also known as the “Bull-Moose Party” (“The Election”). This divide in the Republican party led to a division of voters, causing both parties to lose the election. Had Roosevelt not split the party, the combined popular votes of Taft 's 23.2% and Roosevelt 's 27.4% would have added up to more than Wilson 's 41.8%, meaning the Republicans would most likely have one the election (Leip). Essentially, Roosevelt helped Wilson win, most likely because he believed that the need for progressive reform was an issue that extended beyond individual political …show more content…
Roosevelt was viewed as an ambitious man who was not afraid to pursue his ideals, leading some to call him mad. This is a stark contrast to Wilson, who was viewed as a more reserved man, highly educated and intelligent (Varchol). Their personalities are represented in their foreign policy, with Wilson seeking to remain a neutral country compared to Roosevelt seeking to make America a dominant world power. This was their most divisive issue, and it would go on to become one of the most important ones due to events following the election. During World War I, Wilson remained firm in his stance that the United States should not involve itself in the conflict, even using the platform of “He Kept Us Out of War” during his reelection campaign. He only was convinced to enter war after repeated German aggression led the American public to favor joining. Had Roosevelt been elected president, it is extremely likely that he wouldn 't have hesitated to drive the U.S. headfirst into war at the first opportunity (Milkis). His prominent roles in the establishment of the Panama Canal and the Spanish-American War represent this involved style of policy. Despite being minor issues during the election, foreign policy became the largest issue just two years later, with great influence on the future of world

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Many voters are picking their candidate simply because they could never vote for the other, as both of the candidates are out of touch with the people and involved in scandals. Based on the history of the two-party political system and…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American Neutrality

    • 2283 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Roosevelt had declared American neutrality. He did this to protect the country from joining the war and being in combat, yet he was still in support of Great Britain. All though all of America was horrified in the actions of the Germans in WWII they still favored neutrality over going into war. Although Roosevelt knew Congress would not declare war he at least found a way around it to supple aid to the foes of the German 's. He created a bill that would allow him to sell weapons to those nations on a "cash and carry ' basis.…

    • 2283 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Presidents Wilson and Roosevelt both wished for America to remain neutral, yet each prepared for war despite neutrality. Each war found America to be in support of their allies despite a declaration of neutrality. The biggest difference in the process of America entering World War I and World War II was the economic and political situations prior to the war. America prior to World War I was experiencing a time of prosperity and imperialism, while prior to World War II America favored isolationism and experienced a great…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    While Wilson called for utter neutrality, House fostered strong pro-British sentiment which was reflected in his reports to Wilson. Acting on the President’s behalf, House travelled throughout Europe trying to establish the war-aims of each nation and pushing them towards a potential peace conference, but while Wilson sought “a war with no victors” House envisioned American…

    • 2119 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    He states that America is not ready for war and would have great difficulty invading nations an ocean away. Axis armies are too large, and battle hardened for the United States to defeat them on their surf. He asked that Americans set an example for the world by peacefully spreading democracy. According to Lindbergh’s testimony on Feb. 6, 1941 before the Senate foreign affairs committee, Lindbergh did not believe the British could win the war. He thought America’s involvement would only prolong the war and increase the destruction in Europe.…

    • 1261 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How would you feel if your vote in deciding the next president of our country didn’t matter? Well, this is true for many people due to our broken Electoral College system of voting. I strongly feel that we should get rid of it for many reasons. My first reason is that it doesn’t give equal representation to certain states. My second reason is that it doesn’t match up with the popular votes that were taken by the people.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This was because Republicans were dominating the American Supreme Court who were opposed to the New Deal and denied democracy by throwing out laws that Roosevelt had been elected to pass. Also it was not that he took over the power and used it for his own, he used it to settle down the US depression as soon as…

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Howard Taft Personality

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Taft was then facing William Jennings Bryan as his opponent who was running for the Democratic party. Bryan was a populist and argued that he was better fit to continue progressive policies than Taft. The support from Roosevelt and Taft’s promises to keep continuing Roosevelt’s policies helped him win the election. Taft won by a considerable margin getting 321 electoral votes and beating Bryan by 9 percent in the popular vote. Taft then served as president for one term from 1909 to 1913 after losing reelection to Democrat Woodrow Wilson due to Theodore Roosevelt running and splitting the vote among…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Party views him as a threat, not only because they disagree with his policy, but also because they think he could not win a national election since his policy would spilt the voting demographic towards the democratic side of things. Trump could very well win the nomination, however if he does it will come at the expense of four more years of democratic…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some of the largest opposing groups of the Electoral College are the third parties. The National Archives and Records Administration (n.d.) concluded that third parties tend to have negative opinions of the Electoral College, and those opinions have affected the public 's opinion about the system as a whole. The last third-party candidate that became a major candidate in the election was in 1912, and he lost the presidency by 178 electoral votes. A third-party system is not utilized in the Electoral College, but third-parties have not had enough instances of having a strong showing in the elections for the system to be…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays