Why The Seminole Indians Won The Trail Of Tears

Improved Essays
The Seminole Indians were also part of the tribes which were ushered out of their homeland in the west. After the ratification of the Indian Removal Act the Seminole tribe encountered the harsh force of the United States. The Seminole fought back in an effort to protect their tribe and their land. Many homes of Seminole people were demolished and their occupants were arrested. The Treaty of Payne’s Landing was signed on May 9, 1832, it surrendered any existing land in Florida owned by the Seminole. The treaty allowed Seminole leaders to preview the land their tribe would be moving into. There was a group of Seminole chiefs that embarked on their exploration together. When they arrived at Fort Gibson in the fall of 1832 the chiefs realized they …show more content…
The Seminole lost the war and in January of 1837, several thousand American soldiers entered Florida and forced the Seminole to move.

The Choctaw tribe was once again part of the Trail of Tears. On the day of September 27th, 1830 the Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek was signed. This was a pact between the Choctaw and the United States of America. It was the first treaty regarding the relocation of Native Americans under the direction of the Indian Removal Act. The treaty replaced 11 million acres of Choctaw land for 15 million acres of land in what is now Oklahoma. The Choctaw chiefs negotiated with the American government about when their tribe would have to leave, George Gaines felt it was best if a third of the Choctaw population would leave in 1831, and the others in 1832 and 1833. This was finally agreed upon. The date was set to November 1, 1831. The Choctaws were given the first two weeks of October to gather crops, sell their houses, and pack their belongings. However, because the state of Mississippi was so eager to let the Native Americans go they ordered the Choctaw to leave their crops in the state. They assured them they would grow new
…show more content…
In the Worcester vs. Georgia im 1832 the United States Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokee were not to be relocated. President Andrew Jackson, however tried to override the ruling and demanded the Cherokee be removed. He was allowed to do so based upon the Treaty of New Echota. This treaty was signed by about 100 Cherokee leaders and surrendered all land east of the Mississippi River to the United States in exchange for money and land in the west. At this time the Cherokee had passed their own law within the Cherokee National Council stating that all Cherokees that signed away land would be put to death. Most of the leaders that signed the treaty were put to death. Though most Cherokee people were against the New Echota Treaty the United States government prevailed using the treaty to vindicate for the act of forcing 17,000 Cherokee people out of their native land. In the summer of 1838 the Cherokee were rounded up and sent on ships to their new territory. Some Native Americans were put in prison camps, approximately 4,000 Cherokee died from either hunger, disease, or from exposure to the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Another obstacle was the Cherokee that held significant land in Tennessee, Georgia, Mississippi and Alabama. Land hunger, again, drove Georgia to try to evict the tribe. Asking Jackson for help, Jackson had a bill drafted this bill was described by some to be harsh, arrogant and racist but was still passed in 1830. Faced with such realities some Cherokee accepted the offer of $68 Million and 32 million acres west of the Mississippi. In the next two years there were a few court cases that mad it all the way to the Supreme Court.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The white settlers had wanted the Native Americans land for farming. Jackson had decided to remove all Native Americans from their land. In 1830 Congress passed the Indian Removal Act, ordering all Native Americans to move west of the Mississippi River. The Five Civilized Tribes consists of The Cherokee, Choctaw, Seminole, Creek, and Chickasaw.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Indian Removal

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Treaties was one way the U.S. Government us to displace Indians from their land, the removal act of 1830 was a mechanism used to displace the Indians. Where this failed, the government broke the treaties and the court's ruling to spread the movement west. Americans flocked to the south, began moving toward into what would become Alabama and Mississippi. The Indian tribes living there created a problem to the expansion; white settlers petitioned the government to remove them President Thomas Jefferson and James Monroe wanted the tribes to trade their land for lands in the west. This did not happen the major transfer happen only because of war.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Indian Removal Act of 1830, also known as the Trail of Tears, was the forced removal of Indians from their homes to the state of Oklahoma, which was considered Indian territory at the time.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This act gave him the authority to remove treaties that had tribes living east of the Mississippi river. Initially, the relocation of First Nations was optional yet in the end they were forcibly removed from their lands. To prevent this from happening, the Cherokee Nation v. Georgia Supreme Court case in 1831, assured that the Cherokees could remain in Georgia without any interference by the government. This meant that their homelands and lives could not be subject to the state of Georgia making their lands “sovereign nations”. A year later, the Worchester v. Georgia Supreme Court ruling was also initiated by Cherokees.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Cherokee Nation and the Trail of Tears During the spring semester of 2016, I was given the opportunity to read a very insightful book called, The Cherokee Nation and the Trail of Tears, by Theda Purdue and Micheal D. Green. The book covers the events leading up to, during, and directly after the Trail of Tears. The Trail of Tears was the mass migration of Native Americans from their motherland in the eastern shores of the United States, to the territories of the southwestern United States. Throughout the early 19th Century, there were many conflicts between the government and Native Americans; although none were more racially and economically motivated than that of the state of Georgia and it’s citizens. “We believe the present plan…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Cherokees had a lot of pressure upon them about leaving the land. “The idea of Cherokees being civilized was not going to happen fully because of the new pattern of racist thought” (Green & Perdue, 15). The Cherokees were the most civilized Indian tribe, so they did not understand why they were being justified for removal for the American citizens. Andrew Jackson said “making treaties with the Indians was absurd, so the best way to get the land from the Cherokees was to just take the land” (Green & Perdue,…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nowhere in this act did it say that the natives would be forced by gunpoint to leave so the executive branch did a bad job and going threw with the law and should have been checked or had the bill vetoed. ”In the fall of 1838, the U.S. government, now under Van Buren, ordered the forcible removal of the Cherokees from Georgia to the Indian Territory in present-day Oklahoma”(Aboukhadijeh). The government should have not forced the cherokees out of their home because they had no business to ask them to sign the treaty of ecoata in the first place. With all this information you know know about the indian removal act and how corrupt the government was at this time.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    They described this removal as “the extinction of Cherokee.” The Indians were stubborn to the commands of the people of Georgia, so as a sign of revenge for overlooking their command, Georgia extended a state law in the 1820’s. The law removed the rights and existence of the Cherokee. (Kimberley, 92, 2012) Georgia wasn’t alone when it came to removing the Indians. Andrew Jackson was composing a removal policy for the Indians to head west of the Mississippi River, into Oklahoma.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Territorial Expansion DBQ

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the greatest developments of the 19th century was the Industrial Revolution, as it paved the way for a new way of living in America. New forms of technology and transportation contributed to the increased expansion from the established eastern cities to the western frontier. Although this expansion created many new possibilities, there was still people who felt expansion was detrimental to the nation. Between 1800 and 1855, supporters and opponents of territorial expansion influenced federal government policy by urging the government to act, or not to, on expansion debate that would affect the future of the nation. During the 1800’s, America was ready to expand but the French held control of New Orleans and the Louisiana territory,…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He commented "It gives me pleasure to announce to Congress that the benevolent policy of the Government, steadily pursued for nearly thirty years, in relation to the removal of the Indians beyond the white settlements is approaching to a happy consummation” (Library of Congress, Jackson, 1830). At that time however only two tribes agreed to leave their land, the others were not in agreement with the Indian Removal Act. In response, the American Indians fought back on a political level, Chief John Ross who represented the majority of the American Indians who did not want to leave their lands tried to diplomatically and legally maintain autonomy with the United States…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chief John Ross had a valid and undeniably strong argument against the 1835 Treaty of New Echota. He argues that treaty “is a fraud upon the government of the United States and an act of oppression on the Cherokee people” (John Ross’s Letter). He states that the Cherokee people, which was over 15,000 people, would never had agreed to the treaty and the treaty was made wrongfully. He argues that there should be another meeting and the Cherokee people should be equally consulted. John Ross uses a valid piece of evidence to support his argument.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Things that lead up to the Indian removal act being passed was the greed of white settlers who kept moving onto Indian lands. They believed the Indians were in their way and pressured the federal government for Indian land. All five tribes showed resistance, but the Cherokee tried doing it the peaceful way. Their leader John Ross took their case to the Supreme Court. Chief John Marshall appealed to the Cherokee in March of 1832 and said “The law of the Georgians can have no force”.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The natives land was constantly being settled on, their livestock stolen, even their villages burned to the ground by the European American Settlers. By signing with the Indian Removal Act, the indigenous peoples were given an opportunity to get away from the violence and discrimination of the settlers. The Indian Removal Act gave the Native Americans a means of survival, thus benefitting the Native Americans and saving many lives that may have been lost on both the European American and the Native American sides had the Native Americans remained on their homeland.            The Native American Tribes were offered land west of the Mississippi River that they would have total sovereignty over. President Andrew Jackson was given the legal right by the Indian Removal Policy to grant the land west of the Mississippi River to the Native Americans for them alone to govern over to the tribes that did agree to give up their ancestral homelands. Most of the European American population believed that America would never expand beyond the Mississippi River, so the Native American Tribes would be safe from the settlers heading west to create their homes on the new…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Trail Of Tears Essay

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages

    But, Congress approved the treaty even though John Ross had 16,000 signatures on his petition to fight back the ruling. Only 2,000 Cherokees left their land for territory along the Mississippi River. New U.S. President Martin Van Buren appointed “General Winfield Scott and 7,000 soldiers to expedite the removal process. Scott and his troops forced the Cherokee into stockades at bayonet point while whites looted their homes and belongings.” Within that move, the soldiers “marched the Indians more than 1,200 miles to Indian territory.…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays