In the Protagoras's Wager, I believe that Protagoras's pupil Eulathus won the case. My reasoning for that would be that Eulathus backfired toward the argument with his own masters tactful speaking skills as follows "No sir you have it backwards. If you defeat me in court then I have lost my first case and so do not owe the money; if I defeat you, the court will rule that I do not owe you the money. Either I defeat you or you or you defeat me. In either case, I do not owe you the money"- Eulthaus. This defeat on Protagoras part ulitimalty shows that although his pupil did defeat him in my opinion; his teachings did have value in the end and therefore perhaps it proves that what he charged such a highly quanitity of money to teach was not only
