Why Do People Naturally Good

Decent Essays
Show More
John Locke's view on people and their good will is similar to my viewpoint of people being naturally good. The ideas of humans being reasonable beings, born free and equal and having the natural rights of life, liberty, and property, and the Tabula Rasa are reasonable and agreeable that Locke believed in. However, Thomas Hobbes idea of all humans are naturally wicked and selfish shouldn't be fully discriminated and ignored. I believe that all humans are naturally good because of personal experiences of seeing people helping others out of their own will, reporting and sharing news and important information, and putting things into action that will overall have a good impact on anybody.

Everywhere around the world, there are people who volunteeringely …show more content…
People who spread info to others about these current unfortunate events really help out the uninformed communities around the world, and they are an example of naturally good people. In current events, there was a mass shooting on a college campus in Oregon; how people are informed of this unfortunate event is by the news. Also, in social media, people have informed a community of people, for example artists, of their art being stolen by a source from a company. Without the good nature of these people, many people would be clueless of what's happening, and in danger of not knowing dangerous and risky events. Generally, people do know right from wrong; their actions that they act on happen because they know what's right and what's wrong. However, there are times where shared information can be incorrect, corrected by another source. With the same experience, someone also informed the artist community that their artworks are being stolen by search database, not just by the website. Even though some people didn't know that their information was incorrect, what they did wasn't wrong. They did the right thing of sharing what they knew of a dangerous situation, and that's good. Whether a human being's actions are incorrect, that shouldn't classify that person as naturally

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Good And Evil: Are Humans Inherently Good Or Evil
    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Good And Evil: Are Humans Inherently Good Or Evil

    Locke believed that humans would strive to go forward and advance in an absence of law and order, on the other hand, Hobbes believed that humans would be at constant war if left in a natural state. There seem to be two prominent sides in the debate over good versus evil, but there is also a diverse and expandable middle ground. Correspondingly humans are born neutral with a whole world to shape them into a person with evil tendencies or righteous tendencies. Subsequently humans are clean malleable slates that can be shaped by societal reactions, one’s environmental raising, and situations that one can find themselves in and how they are to…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Cyrus The Great Dbq
    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Cyrus The Great Dbq

    Each man was created by an ‘infinitely wise maker.’ Locke agreed with Hobbes that it is man’s duty to act in their own self-interest and seek self-preservation. However he also believed that men had a right to life, liberty, and property, and that those rights were not to be taken away from man under any circumstances. Since Locke believed that man was guided by reason, he believed that men would reason that in order to preserve themselves, they would also have to preserve the state of other men. Therefore Locke argued that the state of nature was ideal and that men harmoniously worked together to achieve…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    What Are John Locke's Major Accomplishments
    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What Are John Locke's Major Accomplishments

    In 1600s England John Locke was an Enlightenment Philosopher who believed in natural law. Locke had many achievements during his time that people could think of as good or bad. I think that Locke´s accomplishments that he made during his time should be thought of more as good rather than bad. During his early life John Locke was born in Wrington, England in 1646.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Similarities Between Rousseau And Locke On Education
    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Similarities Between Rousseau And Locke On Education

    Rousseau and Locke have similar views on the idea that humans are born good. Locke supports Aristotle’s theory of tabula rasa, meaning blank slate. He believes that children are born with a clean slate without sin and innate ideas. A child is born with specific capabilities that are genetically linked to how they are able to develop later in life. With the help of education a child has the potential for growth.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    How Did John Locke And Hobbes Influence The Declaration Of Independence
    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How Did John Locke And Hobbes Influence The Declaration Of Independence

    Although Locke and Hobbes disagreed about the nature of people, both of them made a point of stating that people had inalienable rights. Locke’s whole basis of philosophy was based on the belief that every human had natural rights, rights that existed…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    John Locke's Two Treaties Of Civil Government
    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    John Locke's Two Treaties Of Civil Government

    John Locke is a philosopher who strongly believed that a government should function to protect its citizens. His belief differed from that of another prominent philosopher, Thomas Hobbes, who argued that the government functions to tell the people what to do. Even more, the failure of a government to instruct people will lead to more conflict between members of society. Thus, Locke’s perception of the government is that it is the government’s responsibility to ensure that the people’s natural rights are protected. There should not be any substance of hierarchy or divinity rule, because this could potentially fail to protect and defend people living under the government.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    I Believe More In John Locke's Point Of View
    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages

    I Believe More In John Locke's Point Of View

    I believe more in John Locke's point of view because he explains how you have to understand a what state a man is in. This is so that you understand one's possessions and actions. He states how everyone should be ¨equal and independent¨ It states how you shall not ¨harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions: for men [are] all the workmanship of one omnipotent and infinitely wise Maker¨ I believe more with John Locke because Thomas Hobbes states that when two men come to enjoy the same thing they will become enemies and that is not always the case because two people can enjoy the same thing without having a conflict come in between. He says how God didn't make things for us to destroy ¨there could be then little room for quarrels…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    John Locke Rationalism Analysis
    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages

    John Locke Rationalism Analysis

    The human mind has proliferated much polemic discussions questioning the origin of mankind’s knowledge. Rationalism proponents, who claim that the mind developed based on reason, rebutted the theory that the mind developed based on experiences. Other proponents, the advocators of empiricism, believed that human knowledge derived from sensory experiences. In addition, empiricist philosophers adamantly supported the tabula rasa, preaching how humans were born with a clear mind where experiences molded the mind; henceforth, in John Locke’s essay, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, he portly extols how humans should be able to freely think for themselves. With Locke’s claim of human liberty, he additionally implies how men would be able…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Locke: Hobbes Or Locke?
    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Locke: Hobbes Or Locke?

    Hobbes or Locke? Wouldn’t you agree that a person’s way of being is influenced by the things they’ve gone through? I believe we all have one thing in common, we’re all naturally moral and reasonable, rather than selfish and greedy at the core. The things a human being has to phase throughout their life is what shapes them, ups and downs are inevitable. We as human beings have progressed from being violent to peaceful, we’re finally coming to reason with the “natural rights”, as Locke would say, us people will always have.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Are People Naturally Good
    • 147 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Are People Naturally Good

    In my opinion, people are naturally good. People are born good, but their experiences in life can change their actions and perspective on things. We are all innocent as a child. During our childhood, we learn from our parents and surroundings. When we learn about things in life, it makes up our personality and the way we look at the world.…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Alexander Hamilton's Influence On Government
    • 1832 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Alexander Hamilton's Influence On Government

    As one of the Founding Fathers of the United States, Alexander Hamilton had an immense influence on the development of America during the years following the Revolutionary War. He can be largely attributed to the survival of the young country that had been once been on the brink of failure following the winning of its independence. Influenced by the economic theories and philosophies developing in Europe during the same period, Alexander Hamilton applied his strong nationalistic approach to both the government and the economy. Through this approach and his various views on society, he proved capable of leading the nation from being an exhausted country lacking authority to being a nation that fostered economic prosperity and vitality. From…

    • 1832 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Locke Vs Hobbes Essay
    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Locke Vs Hobbes Essay

    Thomas Hobbes and John Locke both share some similarities. They were both philosophers and social contract theorists during the enlightenment. The definition of the State of Nature varies depending on the person. Hobbes says that the state of nature is “war of every man against man.”. He said that people were born greedy and that everyone had the urge to gain more power.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Views Of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke And Karl Marx
    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Views Of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke And Karl Marx

    Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Karl Marx were three opposing philosophers during the Enlightenment with their own interpretations on government and people. Hobbes believed society needed an absolute monarchy, “to confer all their power and strength upon one man.” Locke said that human nature had natural rights, and were therefore “not to be under the will or legislative authority of man.” Finally, Marx believed in communism, in which belongings are public. All of the philosophies had their own relation to the social contract, which was introduced by Jean Jacques Rousseau.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes And Locke's View On Human Nature
    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hobbes And Locke's View On Human Nature

    Hobbes, on the other hand, thinks that people only care about power and appetite. We want certain things and we want to get power to get those things. Hobbes’ view is that there is no such thing as responsibility. Moreover, we look at the state of nature. Locke stated that the state of nature is the state of no government; law that obliges everyone and reason.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Nature Vs Nurture And Nature
    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Nature Vs Nurture And Nature

    Thomas Hobbes believes humans are born evil, their natural instinct is to be envious, violent, and narcissistic, however, by fear and reason, they are capable of preserving peace. On the other hand, John Locke believes humans are mostly peaceful, good, and pleasant, but circumstances can cause people to be violent and war-like. Locke and Hobbes also differed in social contract theories, whereby John Locke believed that all people have rights that need to be protected by a government, yet the people should remain in power; Thomas Hobbes supported the idea that people are all bad, and because of that, an ultimate ruler needs to establish laws that man should abide by. Although these views seem very apples and oranges, there is a huge discrepancy. John Locke promoted the preservation of all human rights, and on several occasions disapproved of slavery, however, it turns out that he actually endorsed it and proposed that people should have absolute power over them.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings