Locke Vs Hobbes Essay

Thomas Hobbes and John Locke both share some similarities. They were both philosophers and social contract theorists during the enlightenment. The definition of the State of Nature varies depending on the person. Hobbes says that the state of nature is “war of every man against man.”. He said that people were born greedy and that everyone had the urge to gain more power. He also thought that people were created equally because then everyone was capable of killing one another even if someone was stronger or smarter than the other. That’s why he wanted to enforce absolutism. John Locke also agreed that everyone was equal. In his book, Second Treatise on Civil Government, he says that because all humans are equal they can’t over power another and they are free to do what they want. …show more content…
If you commit a crime at anytime, anyplace, then you would be punished. Hobbes’s Leviathan said that people had the natural right to survive but he also said that people must command to the sovereign. In An Essay Concerning the True Extent and End of Civil Government John Locke expresses how all humans have natural rights to life, liberty, and protection of your property. The Social Contract Theory is the agreement among several individuals who decide to follow a certain theory such as Hobbes and Locke. Hobbes theory was that if you do what you are told then you are safe. There is no way to break the social contract rule because you do not have the freedom to rebel against the sovereign. Locke says that you have the right to live and keep your property. Locke and Hobbes both thought of everyone as equal but in different ways. They both had opposite theories and beliefs even if they were both philosophers during the