Against The Death Penalty

Superior Essays
The death penalty can be a very controversial topic. You can ask anyone around the world and everyone certainly will voice their personal opinions surrounding the topic. As an individual we have to ask ourselves where do we stand? Are we for or against the death penalty? I personally am against the death penalty when it comes to the decision whether a life should be taken or spared. I do believe if a person has committed a crime they certainly should be punished for it, just not sure how far the punishment should go.
The capital penalty history has been recorded to go back as far as the 1700 century where people were stoned, beheaded, and boiled to death for crimes such as adultery, witch craft, and theft. As time moved forward throughout the
…show more content…
My only question would be so does that mean that rapist should be raped and arsonist should have their house burned down? Some crimes are heinous and unimaginable, and it may warrant the highest punishment possible; when the evidence is substantial and overwhelming.
Like the case of the notorious John Wayne Gacy rightfully received the death penalty, because there was no justice in keeping him behind bars where he would continue to have no remorse and possibility to ever be redeemed for his crimes. People seem to think someone like John Wayne Gacy did suffer in jail, and regretted what he did, however when he hid bodies of young boys and men in his home after he killed them he did show regret or remorse. We as society will never know because he was executed.
As a society we tend to use the death penalty as an absolute justice. But in reality, society makes many people do many things, and a murder has to be triggered by a cause. Most murderers have been exposed to violence and injustice as children, and society has done nothing to help these victims. As in the case of Aileen Wournos (Reynolds, 2003) who killed men in Florida while working as a prostitute after she had been violently raped while working, she herself was abused horrifically sexually and physically at the hands of her own grandfather beginning at the age of 4 years old. Upon being charged with such crimes against his own children
…show more content…
People often say the death penalty is to prevent crime, and prevent future deaths perpetrated upon unsuspecting innocent victims. However, we as a society have to take into consideration our flawed and imperfect judicial system and the potentially innocent victims that are being prosecuted.
The judicial system does make mistakes; which gives leverage to the anti-death penalty debate. The possibility of a legal mistake by the judicial system could potentially cause the death of person who was innocent. In the case of Timothy Evans in 1949 (Jesse, 1957) who was accused of murdering his wife and daughter after proclaiming his innocence stating he believed his neighbor committed the murders.
Evan’s subsequent death by hanging, later led authorities to discover evidence 3 years later the neighbor was the one who in fact a serial killer who had killed 6 other women and Evan’s daughter. The judicial system ignored vital evidence during the trial of Timothy Evans that caused the miscarriage of justice leading to his death for a crime he did not commit. It was not until 16 years later a judicial system exonerated him and overturned his conviction; unfortunately it is too late for

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    While her and a male accomplice had been drinking, and doing drugs for three days they snuck into a Houston, Texas apartment with the intent to steal motorcycle parts and for no reason at all the murder of two innocent people happened instead. The victims were brutally hacked to death with a pick az. Each victim suffered more than twenty blows. Tucker hacked at the victims long after they were dead and had left the pick ax sticking out of the woman’s chest. She and her accomplice may have never been caught had they not bragged to their friends of the terrible crimes they had committed.…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Allowing the government to legally kill the guilty person is wrong, and violates this person’s legal rights. Burns thinks that by killing the person we have alleviate the anger, and have rid the world of that wicked person. We have somehow, gained retribution for the act they have committed, and shown others that we do not allow this act. But, I believe by allowing the courts to legally kill we are promoting the act of killing. We are saying it is OK, to kill someone if they have killed someone you love.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Continue Death Penalty

    • 1084 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For instance, a day after July 30, 1978, a gang seized and robbed a family who tried to help them after the gang’s car got a flat. The gang then shot the family, starting with the 24 year old marine sergeant all the way down to his 22 month old toddler ( Kay, par. 1). The public responded with outrage, and the government sentenced the gang members to death. Jonathan Kay, a news reporter for the National Post, said that slaughtering a whole family in cold blood is one of the few crimes deserving of capital punishment( par.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    No it’s not any good. The death penalty is immorally wrong in every way possible. It kills people, some innocent and some not. It causes problems with people and family members that grieve. Don’t you think that the death penalty is letting people get away with crimes and murders easier?…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To quote Gandhi, “An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.” This quote holds some key evidence for the death penalty. Taking one man’s life to justify the murder of another is preposterous! Executing someone does not restore balance. At the start of researching the death penalty, my view was initially in favor of the death penalty, but after all the research and facts, my conclusive view is against the death penalty. I found that my views changed and even though I might have been for the death penalty at the beginning, after my research I found that the death penalty is nothing more than the government reminding everyone that in the end, they have the final say.…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pro Capital Punishment

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This way, the criminal would then realize the severity of his actions and would pay for whatever he/she had done. Many believe that the “risk of a person being wrongly accused is almost nonexistent and is just an argument that opponents of the death penalty use to abolish the death penalty” (Kenneth 2005). “Supporters of the death penalty emphasize that opponents can’t prove that someone in modern time who was executed was actually innocent” (Kenneth 2005). On November 18 1998, Robin Lovitt was tried and sentenced to death on the count of murder (Kenneth 2005). Prosecutors said that an officer had “thrown away evidence [in a very intentional way]” which caused Lovitt to go back to court because of this solid piece of evidence that might have been the murder weapon which needed to be tested for DNA (Kenneth 2005).…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Whether it’s a command or not, someone is killing another person. We don’t know if the person who committed the crime was commanded to do it in return to let a loved one live, so why not place that person in jail without parole instead of killing them? Then years later you find out that the person you executed was actually guilty but there’s nothing you could do about it because you took the “easy” way out and killed the person. In the documentary, Deadline from 2004 , the warden said that the death penalty was a gruesome act towards him and other prison guards because it made them look like killers themselves (Document 9). This shows the pressure that wardens themselves feel about having to kill someone making the death penalty a cruel punishment because even people who are not on the death row are affected to even participate in such act.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Other countries use the death penalty to punish their political opponents. The death penalty is a bad thing for inmates family because it's a reminder of what the government did to their loved one. When put on death row there is a risk of executing an innocent person.When DNA exonerations several that murder case are often riddled with problems. The problems are mistaken eyewitnesses, bad lawyers, shoddy forensics, unbridledly, jailhouse snitches etc. Ray…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Susan Wright claims that her husband abused her in the early years of their marriage, but never filed a report about it (fowler, 2010). The couple had two sons who Jeff Wright also started to abuse. On the night of the murder, Jeff Wright abused one of the couple’s sons. This might have drove Susan Wright to kill her husband. Later that night, Susan Wright tied her husband to their bed and stabbed him 193 times (fowler , 2010).…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Death Penalty Should be Abolished Immediately In the United States 31 out of the 50 states still have the death penalty. This portrays how many states still support the inhumane form of punishment, other known as capital punishment. Those in favor of the death penalty argue that people who commit gruesome crimes deserve to be executed for them. However, others believe that it is a cruel, inhumane punishment that doesn’t obey the Consition. The death penalty is intolerable and should be abolished everywhere in the United States because of its botched executions, high costs, innocent people being executed, and religious beliefs being broken.…

    • 2463 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics