What Is The Grudger Case

Improved Essays
By applying the Grudger case, it is evident that Fuller agrees with abolishing retrospective law. Fuller recorded this case as a German woman was prosecuted for denouncing her husband to the authorities in accordance with the anti-sedition laws of 1934 & 1938 right after the war. The husband was prosecuted and convicted of slandering the Fuehrer, which carried the death penalty. Despite being sentenced to death, the husband was not executed instead was sent as a soldier to the Eastern front where he survived the war and on his return instituted proceedings against his wife. The wife later argued that she had not committed a crime because the court had sentenced her husband in accordance with the law of the time. However, the wife was later

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Rummel V Esemell Summary

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Rummel v. Estelle, the Supreme Court is examining the question of “whether the petitioner was subjected to cruel and unusual punishment”, with the petitioner being William James Rummel. In accordance to Texas’ “recidivist statute”, which provides that “[whoever] shall have been three times convicted of a felony less than capital shall on such third conviction be imprisoned for life in the penitentiary”, Rummel was sentenced to life in prison with chance for parole. This, Rummel protested, was “grossly disproportionate” to the three felonies he committed prior to receive this sentence, as none were violent. Justice Rehnquist, who delivered the Court opinion, in which Chief Justice Burger and Justices Stewart, White, and Blackmun joined, noted that Rummel agreed that the recidivist statute was generally constitutional, except in its application to his case. In addition, Rummel did not protest the classification of any of his three offenses as felonies.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moratorium Imposed a moratorium on capital punishment. The governor of Washington said "Equal justice under the law is the state's primary responsibility. And in death penalty cases, I'm not convinced equal justice is being served," the first-term Democratic governor said. "The use of the death penalty in this state is unequally applied, sometimes dependent on a budget of the county where the crime occurred." Literature Gregg v. Georgia Petitioner was charged with committing armed robbery and murder.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    the Chapter 489 Laws of New York of 1888 which stated, “a current of electricity of sufficient intensity to cause death’ for offences committed after January 1st, 1889.” Twenty-six states adopted the use of the electric chair before 1967, and up until 1967 over four thousand people had been killed using this device. In Indiana, which used the electric chair for every execution between 1913-1994, shows that out of 57 people put to death by the electric chair fifteen of them were African American. African Americans, especially in the South, suffered from the hands of the electric chair. In Alabama from 1926-1965 of the 152 people killed by the electric chair, over one hundred and twenty-five of the killed are African American.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Abortion: The Modern Day Holocaust? Ray Comfort compares and contrasts the bloodcurdling Holocaust of 1933 to the modern day abortion epidemic that is sweeping the nation, Comfort then uses the rhetorical context to point his interviewees toward salvation. Comfort does so by exploiting his audience’s own arguments as support for his valid defense of logic. Moreover, Comfort uses rhetorical appeal to persuade his audience and to give support his argument. Comforts interviewees fold quickly under the blaze of pressing questions.…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Grice Court Cases

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages

    By failing to condemn or even analyze the detectives’ actions, the Grice court paid little heed to the Supreme Court’s principle that “an officer’s leave to gather information is sharply circumscribed when he steps off [public] thoroughfares and enters the Fourth Amendment’s protected areas.” By ruling as it did, the Grice court handed down an overly-generous interpretation of a license’s scope, the implications of which are worrisome to the future of Fourth Amendment protected areas. The events in Grice transpired on Fourth Amendment protected property. In North Carolina, it is generally agreed that driveways, pathways, porches, lawns, and other areas that must be traversed in order to reach the front door of a private house are classified…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Case Of Hugh Rich

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hugh Rich, born Olaf Dietrich, was intelligent, handsome and charming, but was flawed with a detrimental down side. A ferocious man, who has been imprisoned by his wild ego, is described by police as having “intelligence without wisdom and brains without judgement”. He had the world at his fingertips, and the ability to achieve great success. Instead he chose to become a career criminal, and took a lethal road.…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Judge oh no set me freeeee Have you heard of Judge Dredd? Have you heard of Judge Gesell? Unlike Judge Dredd, in bloody Batman Comics and an R rated movie, Judge Gesell was just a Judge doing what is right and making a living.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Before the trial, Eva Kor, an Auschwitz survivor stated “He is a murderer because he was part of the system of mass murder” (Qtd. Groening Sentenced to Four Years). Oskar has said that he is only morally guilty, and will probably never serve time in jail. Groening’s appeal will probably not overturn his sentence- his age and health are simply a large factor, and he will have to be evaluated by a health team after his appeal. This is trial is expected to be the last of its kind, and he may not even receive the sentence he deserves.…

    • 127 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Night Essay To dehumanize is to deprive someone of compassion, civility, or individuality. During the Holocaust, the Nazis used dehumanization to belittle Jews to mere “things”; objects with no purpose other than to be a nuisance. The Nazis were brutal in their endeavor to wipe out the “insignificant and worthless” Jewish race, mainly forcing their despicable horrors upon the Jewish people in German concentration camps. Although the majority of the dehumanization of the Jews was in German concentration camps, there was also a great deal of injustice towards them long before ending up in those camps.…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Supreme Court of Georgia subsequently set aside Defendant’s death sentences on the armed robbery counts, on the basis, that defendants are rarely subject to capital punishment for that crime. The Court upheld defendant’s death sentences with respect to the murder convictions. In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in the Furman case, which held a death penalty statute to be unconstitutional, because it resulted in death being imposed in an “arbitrary and capricious” manner, the Georgia legislature revised its death penalty statute so that death could only be imposed when the jury had found the presence of specific aggravating factors. This effectively narrowed the class of murderers subject to capital punishment. The new statute created…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Leonard Peltier Case

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ever since the conviction of Leonard Peltier of first degree murder, there have been numerous arguments over the idea of a pardon. Some believe that political factors may have influenced the way in which the case was prosecuted. Others believe he is completely guilty and the punishment is proportionate. On April 18, 1977, Leonard Peltier was convicted of two counts of first degree murder of FBI Special Agents Jack R. Coler and Ronald A. Williams. Peltier was sentenced to serve two consecutive life terms in prison.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most people think that it would be hard to be tried on 260,000 counts of any crime especially accessory to murder. Nevertheless a 91 year old german radio operator is being tried for all of the jews that she indirectly sent to Auschwitz. Earlier this year a 93 year old bookkeeper was sentenced to 4 years in prison a similar logic. In Germany there has been a rise in these type of prosecutions.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the United States, the legality of the death penalty was challenged in the landmark Supreme Court case of Furman v. Georgia in 1972. The Court declared that the death penalty in unconstitutional in, at least, certain applications because the punishment violates the Constitution’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment. Justice Thurgood Marshall, who argued that the death penalty was unconstitutional in all instances, writes that there are six conceivable defenses given to justify capital punishment, which are “retribution, deterrence, prevention of repetitive criminal acts, encouragement of guilty pleas and confessions, eugenics and economy.” Since a person who is executed cannot possibly commit a future criminal act, that argument is invalid. Also, eugenic justification is roundly abhorred in the 21st century.…

    • 1998 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 2003, a German citizen, Armin Meiwes appeared in court for his crimes of murder and cannibalism. Although Mr. Meiwes confessed to these crimes, the case was not as straightforward as it sounds. The major twist to the story is that the victim in this instance, Bernd-Jurgen Brandes, willingly volunteered to take part in these gruesome acts. This case threw the German legal system for a loop. While the prosecution argued that since Mr. Meiwes killed a man and then proceeded to consume the victim over a period of time, he should be convicted of murder.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Proposition: Hart argues that we conceptualized the Grudge informer case by maintaining unjust law is still a law, but perhaps so unjust that it should be disobeyed: On the one hand, we will begin our analysis by explaining the first part of the proposition “Hart argues that we conceptualized the Grudge informer case by maintaining unjust law is still a law”. In order to understand why according to him an unjust law is still a law, it is necessary to remind briefly his view on the connection between law and morality. As a matter of fact, it is obvious that as Hart is a legal positivist, he is claiming that there is not a necessary connection between law and morality but a contingent one . Nevertheless, even if there is a possible connection…

    • 2196 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays