What Is Paternalism?

Improved Essays
Dworkin Gerald Dworkin’s work focused around paternalism. Paternalism is the practice of people in power limiting the freedom of those who are subordinate to them in their “interest”. His specific focus on paternalism followed the model of Mill’s Harm Principle. Mill’s Harm Principle states that the only reason that one is able to limit another’s liberty of action is if it is for self-protection. The harm principle also states that the only way power can be exercised over another person is to prevent harm to others. Although his work pertained to Mill’s Harm Principle, throughout he accepted two primary claims. The first claim states that a person’s freedom can be restricted in order to prevent the harm of others. The second claim states that a person’s freedom can never be restricted for his or her own good. Even though Dworkin accepted these two terms from Mill, the one that Dworkin chose to focus on is that paternalism is never justified. This claim that Dworkin emphasized helped shape his definition of paternalism. Related to Dworkin’s definition, the Oxford dictionary definition of paternalism is the practice of people …show more content…
Furthering his ideas, instead of focusing on all of the claims made by Mill’s Harm Principle, Dworkin decided to specify the fact that paternalism is never justified via the good it may do for an individual. Dworkin used two strategies in order to acknowledge ways in which paternalism may be justified otherwise. The first strategy he demonstrated by focusing on instances in which paternalism is justified. The second strategy he demonstrated by defining the circumstances in which paternalism seemed to be justified. It was through these strategies that Dworkin comes up with the example of Odysseus and the Mast, effectively illustrating both of his semi-juxtaposing statements. Paternalism therefore according to Dworkin is justified, but only in very limited

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    I disliked Goldman’s argument that health and life are not truly top priorities in people’s lives. He claims that the quality of life trumps the quantity of life in most cases, and he uses this claim in his argument against paternalism. While I believe that in some ways Goldman is right, that people often try to balance the quality of their life with their longevity, I do not believe the concept is as black and white as he paints it to be. There are many cases in which a cancer patient may try to prolong painful treatment with the hope of a longer life rather than to give up on treatment and enjoy his or her final days. However, I agree with Goldman’s overall assessment of paternalism with regards to information disclosure.…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Modern world, societies have to strive towards a civilization by controlling the beings present within them. Dorothy Lee has used her article, "Individual Autonomy and Social Structure" to addresses the key social problem of how we may conform the social structure and order to distinguish need for individual autonomy which has been breached. She argues that personal autonomy will not cause chaos within the society. Many of the aspects of society suppress the individual from personal autonomy. Litigation is made and used to inform the people what they are permitted or not restricted from doing.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hayek believes in little to no government interference in an individual’s life. Hayek argues strongly against coercion and does not even believe in the use of coercion to prevent greater coercion. Coercion cannot be prevented completely, however, in Hayek’s view it should be as limited as possible. Planned economies are a huge form of coercion, and an example Hayek explains in-depth. The individual in this system has no liberty to the extent that they are dependent on the state.…

    • 2226 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through Phillip Zimbardo 's work, nearly 45 years ago, it was discovered what a person could do to another human being when they have near absolute power. A vast majority of people believe that they would never be able to do all the harmful things that were conducted during the prison experiment; yet I feel, after reading about this experiment and other similar experiments, that everyone is susceptible to the tantalizing taste of power. As an example, just recently I had a spat with my older brother. He exhibited sings of trying to impose absolute authority on matters he did not have any authority to make a decision on. His actions, maybe without realizing it, caused me to not eat enough food and lose a good amount of weight as a result.…

    • 1460 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill’s liberty principle is “The only end for which people are entitled, individually or collectively, to interfere with the liberty of action of any of their number is self-protection. The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.” (Mill, p. 6) Mill disagreed with most forms of paternalism because the liberty principle and the forms od paternalism would probably cause conflict with each otherr. I think the most important issues raised in the documentary was that many parent believe that the vaccines that the doctor recommend for newborns and children causes autism. But now because many parents didn’t want their children to get the shot the measles, mumps and whooping cough are all coming back.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He states, “In all such cases there should be personal freedom, legal and social, to do the action and stand the consequences” (Mill, 64). But, in defining freedom, as expressed earlier,…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ageism is a form of discrimination that is prejudice against people because of their age (Wikipedia). Age discrimination is something that people are faced with every day. As the generation of older people grow, they want to stay healthy and being active is something they choose to do. Finding a job was hard for older people, so Congress passed the Age Discrimination in Employment Act in 1967 which was intended for employers to hire people based on their ability to perform on the job and not because of their age. When young people go out looking for a job, some get discouraged if they are not hired.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If a person’s actions only affect themselves, then society, which includes government, should not be able to stop them from what he or…

    • 1770 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dworkin on Judicial Discretion in “Hard Cases” Lu Zhao Boyu (Bozy) | A0127866R In the standard courtroom, one could reasonably expect the judge to be the one responsible for the holding of a case. However, does and should the judge exercise his own discretion when deciding cases? Prominent legal theorist H. L. A. Hart claims that judges do exercise discretion, especially in “hard cases”, where there is no pre-existing or unambiguous rule. To this matter, Hart’s brilliant student Ronald Dworkin offers an alternative theory, which argues that judges do not have discretion and should follow principles instead of rules, even in “hard cases”.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Welfare capitalism is related to social welfare of the employees, and has led to social security, universal healthcare, collective bargaining, and industrial safety. Its role as a frontrunner of the current business ethics movement cannot be denied. The peak of welfare capitalism was in the middle of 20th century. This movement was instrumental in protecting the interests of workers. The workers were stakeholders and their rights were protected against the rights of the owners of business.…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    English philosopher, political economist, and liberal John Stuart Mill published one of his most famous works in 1859: On Liberty. Mill explores the innate and given liberties of people, analyzing what is the extent in which society or government has valid reasons to exercise power over its people. He argues that the individual should not be under the jurisdiction of society or government if their actions are not harming anyone but themselves. The only time society or government should involve themselves and exert power over citizens is if the actions of the individual are harming others within the society.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This essay will critically analyse inclusive legal positivism and will provide with arguments why it is a positivistic theory of law in name only. To do so, it will explore the essence of what legal positivism is by discussing the issues concerning morality and authority. The main argument of soft positivism being a positivistic theory in name only will consist of the assertion that the presence of morality in it makes it contradict with the essence of positivism, namely, that a connection between legality and moral truth cannot exist. This essay will criticise inclusive positivism based on exclusive positivism’s characteristics which will be considered to form the definition of legal positivism. Legal positivism believes that law is a closed…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Consequentialism and deontology are contrasting theories of philosophy that guide us in viewing acts in terms of their morality. The doctrine of consequentialism suggests we should judge the morality of actions purely on the results they produce; whereas deontology aims to judge morality based on the conduct of an individual, and morality is decided from the moral acceptance of a particular action rather than the result the decision produces. These principles of philosophy have existed for thousands of years, with many philosophers throughout history using them as a basis for their work. In the context of an ethical situation, we can thoroughly use these ideologies as instruments to determine an effective solution to prevent a harmful dilemma;…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Family of Origin Introduction Families are a social system that is governed by rules and power structures, in which members become emotionally connected and interdependent (Collins, Jordan, & Coleman, 2012). Families tend to be the responsible agent in shaping the environment where individuals grow and develop. Each member in the family is different, and each contributes to the functionality of the family in a distinctive way. To be able to understand an individual’s behavior within a family, the family context and environment must be understood (Collins, Jordan, & Coleman, 2012).…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Permissive Parenting Styles

    • 3500 Words
    • 14 Pages

    With an autocratic parenting style it is obvious that there is a parent and a child or one can look at it as an inferior and superior relationship. This has been found not to be as effective because there is no responsibility in these types of children. These children have no free choice in anything which can make it difficult for them especially when they are confronted with tough choices of their own. Permissive parenting is just as ineffective as autocratic parenting because of the children doing what they want when they want. There is no level of control and these children are also more inclined to experimenting with drugs, sex and alcohol.…

    • 3500 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Great Essays