What If Edward Snowden Never Blew The Whistle On The N. S.

Improved Essays
Imagine a society in which there was no acts of civil disobedience. People of all different ethnicities, backgrounds, and walks of life, all keeping quiet about their opposition to laws and regulations passed by their governments. Without anyone to speak up and be the voice for others in such a society, nothing would ever change, and people would be forced to suffer silently while their government passed any laws it saw fit. A world where people never exercise their right to peaceful resistance would negatively impact a free society by preventing the society from progressing in a way that is beneficial to the people in it. The true purpose of government is not to prohibit people from their freedoms, but to serve the people for the …show more content…
What if Martin Luther King Jr. never gave his 'I Have a Dream' speech, and instead just kept his dream to himself? What if Edward Snowden never blew the whistle on the N.S.A. invading American's privacy? What if the LGBT community of the United States relinquished their fight for equality and settled for marriage laws that prevented them from being able to express their love freely through holy matrimony? Without peaceful resistance to the law and status quo, progress would come to a halt. Civil disobedience is the oil in the machine of progress, and without it, many old laws would still be in effect. If African Americans never stood up and fought effortlessly and tirelessly for their liberties and rights, we would still live in a world where the Jim Crow laws were in effect and segregation would be the norm. If Edward Snowden never revealed the wrongdoings of the N.S.A., millions of Americans across the country would still be under the invasive surveillance of the association without any knowledge of it. If the LGBT population gave up their uphill battle for equality, thousands of couples would still be unable to marry, no matter how pure and real their love

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Colonists Justified Dbq

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Were the colonists justified in their rebellion against Great Britain? Preamble: The purpose of government is to protect their citizens by imposing rules and implementing systems to further protect their civil rights and their natural rights (Life and Liberty). Yet, when the government violates either civil or natural rights the citizens have the right to rebel. I.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plessy V Ferguson Dissent

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The First Amendment States: “Congress shall make no law… prohibiting… the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” After years of drafting the Constitution, our founding fathers ensured that their presidential system would be immune to corruption and anarchy, thinking thoroughly and thoughtfully of what should be written within the document. Because they specifically allowed citizens to peacefully assemble, they inherently allowed citizens to peacefully resist unjust laws. As long as the people remain calm, peaceful resistance positively impacts a society, for it demonstrates disagreements between the government and the citizens and calls for a better change.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Government is a system of legislators that act on the part of the people, to actively promote a healthy and interactive community - or at least that is what the concept of government was originally. However, government has evolved through those who control it, and oftentimes the role of the government in civilian life is viewed negatively by the governed. Those governed do not always agree with how the system is run, which has created friction between the two parties. Acts of rebellion are often violent, but peaceful protests also are led in order to bring attention to issues, and enact change. “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience”, an essay by Henry David Thoreau, expresses his thoughts on the government and how citizens should respond to governmental issues.…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the history of human civilization, there have been countless times where the people of a nation needed to stand up for what is right to protect their freedoms, whether it be through war or peace. Millions of people have protested unjust laws, gone to war against tyrannical governments, and fought for the freedom of themselves and others. And in the modern day, as news spreads globally faster than ever before, people are always hearing about injustices, whether they be oppression of free speech in China, oppression of immigrants in America, or oppression of homosexuality in the Middle East. One method that people have devised to help stem the tide of injustices and oppression is to engage in civil disobedience, which is an activity where…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peacefully resisting a national law impacts a free society, but depending on the situation, it can be a positive or a negative impact. In "Civil Disobedience" by Henry David Thoreau, he expresses his belief that "government is best when governs least". That is a hard concept to follow, though, considering many citizens of the U.S struggle to conform to the laws we have currently. I would agree that a limited government is extremely necessary, but to have no rules at all is dangerous. If I were to turn on the news at this moment, I would see thousands of protesters against President-Elect Donald Trump.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Disobedience Dbq

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The government becomes to strong and they rely on violence and fear to maintain their control as Henry David Thoreau says “But because they are physically the strongest.” If we look to Nelson Mandela in South Africa we can see civil disobedience does absolutely nothing as Mandela outset his campaign as a nonviolent disobedience to change South Africa’s apartheid. He initially believed in civil disobedience until the government used violence and open fired on him and his people. He then decided violence was necessary.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Disobedience Dbq

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As we take a look at the history of the United States, impacting a free society has not been easy. There have been many laws that have not treated everyone fairly. In order to impact a free society, many had to undergo civil disobedience in order to impact the free society that we live in today. Peaceful resistance to laws positively impact a free society. Without civil disobedience, it would have been almost impossible to make change in our society.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that civil disobedience to laws negatively impacts the free society, whether there is harm or no harm done it still negatively impacts the free society. Thomas Jefferson believed "If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so." He states this not in a speech but paraphrases it in the declaration of independence it is okay to disobey the law. He says “whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government...,". Jefferson is completely with the fact that civil disobedience positively impacts the free society.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peaceful resistance to laws has the possibility of having a positive or negative impact upon a free society depending on the situation, but throughout history it has been proven that more often than not civil disobedience has brought positive change. It all depends upon circumstance when deciding whether or not something can be good or bad for a society and this includes civil disobedience. While it has impacted our society positively, there are ways for it to be abused by the masses in order for them to get what they want or for the result to turn out as less than desirable, though it is unlikely that it would ever work out that way. For example, Cohen states in Seven Arguments Against Civil Disobedience that one of the arguments…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is my view that peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society, if those laws or the government enforcing them are believed to be unjust. In any true democracy, the people have a right, and an obligation, to rebel against an unjust government. As Harris G. Mirkin has written, “The Declaration of Independence, a document that Jefferson claimed was merely an ‘expression of the American mind,’ declared that it was the ‘Right of the people to alter or abolish’ any government, and institute a new one that would better secure their safety and happiness.” While rebellion in any form should not be the first choice, it is occasionally the only choice. The same principles that apply to a revolutionary rebellion also apply to a peaceful…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society as it promotes the creation and the retention of a free country. Free societies are often considered more advanced than the oppressive ones because freedom is something that evolved out of oppression. Now, in the modern world, governments are more or less established, and for them to be changed, the people must act. Civil disobedience is woven through the fabric of the United States. The Revolutionary war granted the underdog colonies independence-- not just independence but freedom.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peaceful civil disobedience will always positively impact a free society because there are voices in our country that are not heard. Our country was founded on the idea that every white man should have the opportunity to succeed and make something great out of their life. As time progressed white women realized that they too should have that opportunity. They would no longer be shackled by the chains of the cult of domesticity. Only about 60 years African Americans finally encompassed civil right movements.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robert O’Connor Concord High School New Hampshire Like many things in life, civil disobedience, is all a matter of perspective. Whether it be the Great Muhammad Ali peacefully opposing his selection for the draft or Rosa Parks literally sitting down instead of standing up for what is right on a bus ride home, each and every case of civil disobedience has its ups and downs. Though, when talking about basic human rights, there is no room to be neutral, and that is why peaceful resistance to laws most certainly impacts a society positively. From an optimistic perspective, everything will be alright in the end. Despite Ali’s…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The peaceful opposition to law is positive on free society because it demonstrates that one can stand up for what one believes it's right. Everyone has different opinions and of course not every person has to agree with what the laws demand. For example Muhammad Ali stood up against not going to war even though it was mandatory for him to serve his country. Even with that he had his own opinion on killing “innocent brown people who’s never bothered us” (Mullen). Ali knew he was going to face consequences for opposing the government and for not being considered to serve his country that provides him freedom.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Right Wing vs. Left Wing Left wing and Right wing politics for many years served to classify the political stance and philosophies of the parties, with the left wing being progressive and the Right wing being traditional. The left and right wing ideologies were not fully developed until the 1960’s where two different documents for different groups were written. The two documents outlined the ideals of Left wing liberals and right wing conservatives, ideals that are still used today. The first document titled the Sharon Statement outlines the principle of the group, Young Americans for Freedom (YAF), and their strong beliefs in a more conservative government.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays