Left Wing Vs Right Wing Essay

Improved Essays
Right Wing vs. Left Wing Left wing and Right wing politics for many years served to classify the political stance and philosophies of the parties, with the left wing being progressive and the Right wing being traditional. The left and right wing ideologies were not fully developed until the 1960’s where two different documents for different groups were written. The two documents outlined the ideals of Left wing liberals and right wing conservatives, ideals that are still used today. The first document titled the Sharon Statement outlines the principle of the group, Young Americans for Freedom (YAF), and their strong beliefs in a more conservative government. The statement was written by Medford Stanton Evans, who was a young newspaper editor …show more content…
Liberty cannot be divided, so both the public and private sector must be able to utilize the same freedom.
Then the statement goes on to say that the purpose of the government is to provide internal order, security, and justice for its citizens. If the Government goes beyond that purpose by having absolute control of the economy, the right to liberty and order will diminish.
The “supply and demand” system of the market economy is the only system that can appease both the requirements of personal freedom and constitutional government, as “supply and demand” is the best solution to providing people with what they need.
The document then concludes by affirming how communism is an international threat and cannot coexist with the liberties that people deserve and that the U.S should fight to rid the world of
…show more content…
The young conservatives believe that the citizens should have the freedom to control their part of the economy, the private sector. With the private market being able to supply people’s demands without interference, the economy would be well again, due to people buying more products. The young radicals believe that if all citizens had more power and freedom to vote on public issues the issues would be solved because the authorities and decision makers that were susceptible to being manipulated by companies would not be the only ones making choices for the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Polányi debated that the society needs to shield itself from both too little and too much protectionism. Market Fundamentalism/Marketizers seek to expand the free market and to separate market and society. They seek to create a market without governmental regulation, where the market dynamics, as the "invisible hand" by Adam Smith, always will assure an optimal use of resources. Since people are self-regulated, the market should be self-regulated. Milton Friedman is still one of the biggest advocates for a free market.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The source states that if there were any kind of government intervention in the economy, the strangling of innovation and self-reliance would take away the widespread prosperity only a free-market economy can provide. This opinion directly corresponds to the ideology of capitalism, the economic aspect of classical liberalism. Capitalism supports many values that are commonly associated with modern-day western economies. One such value, laissez faire economics, professes a government free economy. Therefore, the government is not welcome in interfering with the economy.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The unemployment will decrease with its rates, and it will bring a higher life expectations. In a county with economically free economy, people can own their own businesses without interference. It reduces the corruption between the citizens, and their incomes. There a lot of variety of consumer goods suitable, for different kind of people and religions. There are friendly competitions between different companies.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The more money that is made will result in more money being spent, which in return would boost the economy. Although this theory has a chance of backfiring, there should be no doubt that the minimum wage for full time workers be increased. Democratic socialism attempts to hold onto a slowly diminishing middle class and believes that no man nor woman should live in poverty, especially during these times of economic…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They thought that the people would be more capable and successful with self governing then the wealthy would. They also believed that the voting qualifications should have been lowered to make it more fair for everybody. They believed that regular people needed to participate in government so that it would be fair for everyone. The two parties had different views on many things and this topic was one of them. This was a big issue between the two parties.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Steatism Vs Neoliberalism

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When the government can use its tools effectively it has the ability lengthen citizens' lives, increase overall levels of education decrease crimes, and improve relations with other nations. Capitalist nations like the United States practice a laze faire approach when necessary while stepping in when the economy needs assistance. This leaves important decisions to be made by political leaders. These leaders have the ability to partaken in Statism, or neoliberalism. The Statism approach emphasizes strong actions by the government to support and manage the system of production and distribution of goods.…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Liberals believe that government action should be taken to achieve equality for each and every citizen. They believe that the government has obligations it needs to fulfill, so government intervention is favorable, especially within the economy where it needs to regulate business and government programs. Conservatives on the other hand prefer smaller, slower changes. Rather than having the government involved in the economy, they prefer a laissez faire regulation of the market and businesses. One particularly distinctual factor of conservatives is that they believe in the concept of volunteerism and self-advocacy compared to the liberal belief that it’s largely the government’s responsibility to take care of its citizens.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plumb's Analysis

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages

    First British attitudes towards America prior to the revolution (approximately 1760s) was ultimately sympathetic and supportive. Plumb begins by expressing how in Britain, “For nearly two decades every…Whig ministry rapidly followed another” (Plumb 71). He goes on describing the notions and criticisms of Lord North’s American policy, “Not until rebellion flared up…American policy had become widespread” (Plumb 71). He explores the attitudes in England further by mentioning, a “band of radicals” that formed who: “believed in a wider democratic franchise, toleration of religious belief and the rationalization of law and administration. They were irritated by anachronism” (Plumb 72).…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Government Structure

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The author is professor at University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill and has focused his career on the study of cultural history. In his books, he has focused primarily on the civilizations of ancient times and how they lived their lives at that time. Using the government system as a model, the founding fathers within the United States created a democracy in the states that they hoped would be long-lasting and efficient. In the book, Jeffersonian America: Rome Reborn on Western Shores: Historical Imagination and the Creation of the American Republic, the author examines the thought process that the founding fathers, in particular…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Karl Marx supports the lower-class and he believed that the state should control people’s lives and give free education, healthcare, and housing. Workers support Karl because he thinks that they should be wealthy and not everything is for the rich. The owners supported Adam because he says that they are the ruling class and that they should have all the wealth. Adam wanted to make it hard for poor by increasing prices which helps owners. On the other hand Smith wanted to make the poor’s life better with more money, and that the poor should be treated…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays