Kant's Theory Of Reason Essay

Superior Essays
When it comes to the use of emotion in relation to reason within the Enlightenment, at first glance, Kant’s definition of reason lacks any mention of it. However, in an article by Chad Wellmon, Kant suggests there is a connection between feeling and reason, and therefore reason is not only restricted to the intellect. What does it mean for reason to affect a feeling (or vice versa)? Kant suggests that “all feeling is sensual, and thus determined by natural causality, but on the other hand, he says that respect is a feeling effected through reason” (Wellmon 566). The article goes further to say that Kant compares these subjective feelings to the distinction that men make between right and left—which allows us to spatially place ourselves. In the same manner, Kant is making the connection that men are able to separate …show more content…
She goes further to explain his theory, which explains there is a sense of pleasure, which can be experiences even if there was no former, present desire for it. In this manner, it is applicable to Nathan the Wise through the character of Recha, the adoptive daughter of Nathan and her thirst to explore more of the world; as well as the prejudice and religious tensions that Lessing sought to combat. The champions of Enlightenment believed in reason as a possible solution to dogma, superstition, and unwanted social prejudices. In Nathan the Wise, we see the fight against the stereotypes and prejudice, which is defined by psychologists as an “unjustified or incorrect attitude (usually negative) towards an individual based solely on the individual’s membership of a social group” (McLeod). Lessing sought to combat these religious prejudices by creating an environment within Nathan the Wise where members of these religions could be treated with the respect that their cultural belief deserved, through the use

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In conclusion, profit is the number one concern for these drug companies as proved by using Kant’s second categorical imperative. The large pharmaceutical companies spend money to market their expensive drugs that they want consumers to purchase. They decide which medications will be marked directly to you. If direct-to-consumer advertising was illegal, the money saved on advertising costs might lower the costs for drugs. This current practice uses patients as a means to reach the company’s end, which is profit.…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Chapter 5 Sandel introduces us to the philosopher Immanuel Kant. This chapter talks focuses on Kant’s view on motive such as: What is the Supreme principle of morality and what is human freedom? Kant believes that morality is based on universal law. Kant calls this act categorical imperative. The idea is that you should treat everyone how everyone would want to be treated.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s basis for “Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals” is an objective view into how and why decisions are made among rational beings for the furtherance of their and society’s wellbeing. Through his view in the 1700’s we can see how much of a scientific stance Kant took in journalizing his analyzation of his own and society’s morals. Kant lists five “formulations” that are involved in rational decision-making. Rational beings have utilized the “Categorical Imperative” to shape today’s society by way of relationships and treatises. These formulations give rational beings an expanded view of the many faces of the Categorical Imperative.…

    • 1856 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s Moral Theory is widely studied in philosophy and the field of ethics. In his theory, Kant expresses the ways to determine the morality of an action: examining the intentions behind the action in question is most important instead of merely considering the consequences. Moral actions, he explains, must have the intention of being consistent with duty for the sake of duty and doing the right thing; they cannot be motivated by any inclinations. Actions inconsistent with duty would be, for example, lying, cheating, stealing, or breaking a promise. These actions could never be moral in any case since they defy the honesty of duty.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s impact on Western thought is undoubtedly profound. Being one of the most distinguished figures of the German Idealist movement of the late 18th and early 19th centuries, Kant’s work has set a precedent that, to this day, deeply influences our understanding of ethical discussion, political philosophy, and human cognition. Kant’s multiple contributions still are subject of debate; although, it is his Categorical Imperative that gathers the most attention, discourse, and controversy. Being a reaction to the subjectivity of his era, the Categorical Imperative provides an objective and infallible guideline for universal moral behavior, that stipulates one’s actions should not be dependent on ulterior motives and in consideration that the act itself will become universally accepted, ergo, if one were to steal then one should also be accepting of…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant Morality

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In conclusion, the connection between morality and rationality in Kant’s view is dignity. A moral and rational person is one who chooses to treat others as an end within themselves. A moral person does not act so because they feel like it’s the right thing to do, thus sentiment has no value in the kingdom of ends other than that of the free will to do what is…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Immanuel Kant an 18th century German philosopher considered rather notable for his work in ethical philosophy. Kant was responsible for the book Groundwork of Metaphysics of Morality and his work remains relevant today as a crucial ‘part of Western Moral Philosophy’. Kant argues that reason is what predisposes what is right. Kant believed that religion should not be taken into consideration when determining what is morally right. Kant’s reasoning of this is explained that if one only gaged what is right based on religion this would not result in a ‘supreme principle of morality’ for all people.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant appeals and stress reasons, especially in his belief in synthetic a priori knowledge, where knowledge is independent of experience, meaning that knowledge is more or less based in reason. Additionally, Kant sees epistemological status of morality as innate, meaning the concept of morality is in one’s mind at birth. However, Mill is an empiricist, whom believes that knowledge is based on experience, thus the epistemological status of morality is acquired and learned over time. Furthermore, in the realm of what is considered good, Kant and Mill have opposing viewpoints. Kant sees that the only thing that is good is the good will, whereas Mill sees happiness as the absence of pain, or the preponderance of pleasure over pain.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The author explains an empirical perspective of moral thinking when carrying out certain obligations that are pegged in premises. He argues that it is upon one's moral and logical reason to do what they ought to do in an event of a command or a mere responsibility. The article basically entails critical ethical and utilitarian argumentum regarding principles of moral behavior. The author's elucidation on moral ethics is inspired by Kant and Plato bringing about a clear comparison of duties ought to be done and propositions inter twined with moral decisions.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hume Vs. Kant: Morality

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Kant’s view is that morality depends on our reason. He defines reason differently than Hume. Reason is a universal human capacity that apprehends the limits of our knowledge and separates us from the world of the senses. Kant believes we live in two worlds the natural world and the intelligible world. He is saying that since morality depends on reason it is not a function of happiness, consequences or feelings, but duty.…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the key claims made by Kant in his transcendental account of cognition is the fact that human beings are able to have empirical knowledge of their world. He also emphasizes that such empirical knowledge includes knowledge of the human being. For Kant, empirical study of the human being proceeds by introspection and observation of others, which both can face serious problems. First, due to the complexity of mental life, the human being typically acts differently when being observed. Second, self-observation is obstructed by the fact that, according to Kant, the most interesting and important activities in the life of a human being prevent the calm and attentive work of introspection.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kant's Theory Of Causation

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Kant attributes Hume as his inspiration to the critique of pure reason as Hume’s work motivated him to prove Hume wrong. Specifically, Kant worked against Hume’s concept of causation. Where Hume found no necessity in causation nor of causation, Kant found causation necessary in both senses- otherwise no one would be able to navigate the world. However, Kant’s critique of Hume is much more general than causation, Kant through causation is asserting the existence of synthetic a priori judgements.…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “We could not prove freedom to be something actual in ourselves and in human nature. We saw merely that we must presuppose it if we want to think of a being as rational and as endowed with consciousness of its causality as regards actions” (Page 311). Immanuel Kant believed that freedom is a presupposition of morality. Kant was not concerned with the purity of your will for doing something, but rather with the derivation of moral principles from reason alone for example independently of experience. He focused on emphasized the importance of reason and the ration that comes with our moral principles.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This essay will evaluate Immanuel Kant distinction between public and private reason of An Answer To The Question: What Is Enlightenment? In doing so Kant allows readers to comprehend exactly how to world exists based on his point of view. The thesis will regard the comparison between Kant point of view of the world and how the world is currently functioning right now. This essay will address three topics about this subject which includes the public and private reasons of the politics, religion and the Copernican revolution.…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays