Immanuel Kant Morality

Improved Essays
Title: Good Will, Duty, and the Categorical Imperative
Immanuel Kant

Student: Georgiana Puti
Course: Introduction to Moral Philosophy
Date: 8th November 2014

What is the connection between rationality and morality in Kant’s view?

Morality and rationality is depicted by Kant as an action of dignity thus the connection between rationality and morality in Kant’s view is dignity. In the first and second paragraph I will discuss and argue what it morality and rationality and what is a moral and rational act. Then I will discuss the connection between rationality and mortality followed by a comparison and argument.

According to Immanuel Kant ‘to act morally is to act from no other motive than the motive pf doing what is right’ (p.129) therefore
…show more content…
never lie) in certain circumstances may not be seen as ‘morally wrong’ for example if we take the case scenario of lying to a kidnapper, is this seen as morally wrong? Thus are our actions justified as right or wrong based on the condition and the person we are lying to? This contradicts Kant’s principle as one is not being treated an end within themselves but rather as a mean. As lying to a kidnapper is not wrong since the kidnapper is portrayed as the ‘negative’ character, thus they do not have dignity, kidnappers are not rational beings so they don’t deserve to be treated as an end in the kingdom of ends. Kant would argue that we are ‘morally responsible for the consequences of lying but we are not responsible for telling the truth’, thus lying on the basis of consequences is irrational as consequences are out of our control, when one choses to lie we are responsible for lying no matter the circumstances or the character of the person we are lying to.

In conclusion, the connection between morality and rationality in Kant’s view is dignity. A moral and rational person is one who chooses to treat others as an end within themselves. A moral person does not act so because they feel like it’s the right thing to do, thus sentiment has no value in the kingdom of ends other than that of the free will to do what is

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    “According to Kant, it is wrong for us, as rational beings, to act irrationally (109).” In order to act rational, an individual has to exclude themselves from their emotions. Humans are emotional beings, we tend to rely on feelings rather than intellect. “This view of people as beings who must reject the emotional aspect of their nature is a weakness for some philosophers. People are to a large degree emotional beings and, therefore, a theory that forces them to deny this part of their nature seems misguided and unrealistic (122).” Again, this is illustrated in the lying case stated above. When Sue intentionally lied to Maria to avoid hurting Marias feelings, Sue was acting on her emotions.…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant says that an action cannot be deemed as completely moral if it cannot be universalised. The principle is very just as it rules out the possibility of making exceptions for yourself, obligating you to keep your promises and act towards a certain moral standard. For example if you needed to lie in a situation, you need to think what if everyone lied? The situation would result in chaos and the whole idea of truth being questioned too, as human relationships need trust to function the causality of lying would mean trust would be impossible. On a grand scale, lying is typically associated with being negative but sometimes lying is used in our daily lives to be more moral e.g.…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Promisees cannot contain the end of the actions of deceitful promisors because the promisors’s transparency prevents promisees from being reasoners (4:430). There is one end that promisors have that promisees absolutely cannot have themselves—namely, the end of being treated merely as a means (4:430). Hence, promisees cannot contain that promisors are subordinating the value of their humanity to their own self-interest. Promisors are subordinating promisees’s humanity because they are using it merely as a tool of conditional value from self-interest. Deception is not the problem, rather, it is the failure of having mutual consent of deception.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In short, the issue is whether lies can ever assist others. My own view is that there is no such thing as a lie that does not hurt others. Although I concede that there are lies that are intended to help others, such as white lies, I still maintain that even these lies are selfish as they contribute to hurting the recipients in addition to…

    • 2243 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This judgmental way of thinking does not seem just to me because it cannot be proven. If I was to borrow money from a friend and thought that if I returned the money it would be used for a bad purpose, I still think it would be the right thing for me to do to return the money. Since what I think my friend will do with the money is only an opinion, it would not be right to withhold or steal the money based on a perception that could be wrong. Withholding borrowed items is stealing, which is the opposite of justice. By simply saying that a person is crazy does not…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Part of lying is keeping the truth from others, which is crucial when the truth is hurtful, especially when this negative impact on others is perpetual. Still, lying is inevitable. In Stephanie Ericsson’s, “The Way We Lie” and Mark Twain’s, “On The Decay Of The Art Of Lying” both argue the rationale of lying. Ericsson states that lying is inappropriate and should not be practiced, while Twain believes lying is respectable when done right. Moreover, lying is an aspect of reality that should be embraced, but still at times avoided.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The fact is that the first isn’t truly doing his duty, because his duty to be honest is not his reason for being honest. Even though the consequences of their actions are the same, their reasons for doing it are not. This shows how good will comes out of respect for the moral law and not just the consequences, because if the first shopkeeper knew he would not be caught cheating, he would cheat his customers. He doesn’t respect the moral law, and therefore he doesn’t have the good…

    • 1925 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kant's Obligation Analysis

    • 1936 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Although Butler and the other moral sentimentalists saved morality from many of the failures of natural law theory, Butler’s theory of obligation from conscience alone provides insufficient obligation. In actuality, conscience is a limited and weak authority. According to Butler’s argument, conscience alone is sufficient for constraining people to act morally. Yet, if conscious was a strong enough source of obligation there would be no need for government, laws, and other external sources of obligation. People regularly defy their conscience, despite having a conscience to instill obligation upon them.…

    • 1936 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper we would seek to answer those question by exploring two ideologies of moral community. In this philosophy paper, we will discuss, compare and contrast utilitarianism’s and Kant’s respective theories on what characteristics make one a member of the moral community. First of all, in order to compare and contrast Utilitarianism’s and Kant’s ideology regardless of what make one a member of the moral community we must know some background…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the other hand, the deontological ethical theory would seek to prove torture is not morally right since the end does not justify the means. Torture is not morally justifiable because it is a cruel method, which infringes on a person’s right to enjoy independence…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays