Emile Durkheim's Theory Of Crime: Normal And Functional

Superior Essays
Why did Emile Durkheim say that crime is both normal and functional? Illustrate your answer with examples.

Introduction

Sociologists have dedicated their lives trying to understand people’s social behaviour. Where it originated and developed to understand the fundamentals of a person’s behaviour and why they do the things they do, that cause social change, order and disorder. Emile Durkheim, father of sociology and the most famous sociologists to have lived, he is well know for his theories on Functionalism, Anomie and Division of labour. Emile Durkheim’s theory on criminology showcases how it is a normal part of everyday society and plays an important role in keeping society in balance. Criminals re enforce the idea that there are social norms in everyday life
…show more content…
Crime creates a large amount of jobs for police, courts, lawyers, prisons and much more. If everyone lived in a perfect society there would be no reason to have half of the jobs mentioned. It is important to think about what is considered a crime. If what is considered a crime now and was to be irrelevant and ceased tomorrow would other traits of human behaviour be classified as criminal and deviant. Societies are the ones who control what is morally right and wrong and it changes all the time. Deviance is only the perspective of someone else opinion and they could have different views than someone else in society. Functionalist theory looks at society as a whole and not as individual when analyzing deviance and crime. Maintaining values is a major part in the functioning of a society, as Durkheim believes shared values brings people together as a society. In Sociology.org.uk (n.d, p.4) Durkheim is suggesting that crime only becomes dysfunctional when it becomes unusually high or low, arguing that social change begins with some sort of deviance. For changes to occur, todays normalitiy is yesterdays

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    (Ferner, 2015). Another major problem with the concept of crime as criminal behaviour would be the stigma that is associated with it, for example one individual is convicted for theft and would be labelled a criminal, another individual…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The term crime cannot be defined easily because it does not have one definition nor two; crime is a concept. Moreover, crime is based on a general notion of ideals formed by society, according to time and place (Friedman, 1993, 6). Society does not imply all individuals, the rich and powerful create the laws that compose certain acts as a crime and are then enforced by law enforcement (Friedman, 1993, 10). Thus, giving law enforcement control and power over all individuals. Their job is to protect and serve within their community.…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction Emile Durkheim presents an argument for crime’s benefit to society from The Rules of Sociological Method, 1938. Daniel Patrick Moynihan presents the opposing view in an issue of the American Scholar, Volume 62, in the winter 1993. Durkheim’s argument centers on peer pressure. Crime could disappear if it was offensive enough to society as a whole, thus socially forcing individuals committing such crime into socially pressured good behavior.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So in the article “Defining Deviancy Down”, written by senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, he mentioned some few interesting cases and evidence data from society, comparing the past history to modern social standards. Within the first introduction, the author mentioned one of a quote from the founding texts of sociology, The Rules of Sociological Method (1895), where Emile Durkheim, a French sociologist, set things down as which “crime is normal”. Furthermore, he wrote,…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Instead he argued that new 'functional alternatives' to the traditional religious and traditional forms of government had developed to provide people with a sense of normative security. These functional alternatives, (a) education and (b)professional associations, were the basis of new modern systems of social rules or norms that were more flexible but still provided sufficient psychological normative security for modern populations. If there are communities in any modern society that are more subject to alcoholism, petty criminality, suicide, drug taking, family breakdown, then Durkheimians (ie Functionalists) would argue that there is too high a level of anomie in that…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this reading response, I will be focusing on the article “The Criminalization of Everyday Life” by Sally Engle Merry and “Division of Labor” by Emile Durkheim. Merry and Durkheim have opposing ideas on the topic of crime and criminalization. While Merry believed that it functions to restrict and dominate a group of people, Durkheim believed that it is a necessary tool for societies to operate. Merry stated that laws target aspects of everyday life to insure control of the dominant group over the inferior group.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Agnew Concept Of Crime

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to Agnew many concepts, also known as strains could lead towards someone committing a crime. 3 of the choices I will focus on are child abuse and neglect, homelessness, and marital problems. These 3 concepts all on their own can really drive someone towards commiting crime. But like every aspect of life all things have an opposite. Therefore I will discuss the negatative opposite of those 3 concepts.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction Throughout the semester, we have been learning about the different types of theories of crime. From the least parsimony theory, to the most parsimony theory, Gottfredson and Hirschi 's general theory of crime. I decided to pick Gottfredson and Hirschi 's general theory of crime because, it 's the most accepted and most valid theories of crime. Logical Consistency The six dimensions of self control that Gottfredson and Hirschi state are impulsive, risk taking, physical, simple, self centered, and temper.…

    • 1703 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction “He who does not prevent a crime when he can, encourages it”, a quote from Lucius Annaeus Seneca that helps describe how society views and “prevents” crime. Criminal theories attempt to construct views on how to prevent and fight crime but often the criminal justice system is working against society. The two theories that are explained within are the social learning theory and rational choice theory. These theories will construct views as to how and why the seven crimes are committed using the concepts within the theories.…

    • 2208 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Durkheim goes on in his article to demonstrate why crime is normal in society and he begins by simply explaining how a society without crime is impossible. The only way to completely get rid of crime would be to have it increase so high across all of the society that stopping it became the sole focus of all of the society. It is also important to understand that certain crimes are considered worse than others even though they violate the same principle. “Thus, for example, theft and mere misappropriation of property offend the same altruistic sentiment, the respect for other people’s possessions. However, this sentiment is offended less strongly by the later action than the former.”…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction: There are many unique theories as to why humans commit crime, engage with others in crime, and are lured or motivated by a criminal lifestyle. By studying these theories, one is afforded a chance to develop and then test potential solutions to this enormous social problem that has afflicted humanity since the beginning of time. The various ways of deterring, controlling, preventing, and punishing crime throughout history has changed drastically. Attempting to attack the problem of crime head on, has not worked; so developing different ways to learn why, adapt, and address the root causes of crime is the current strategy. One very important point is that the structural frameworks and contributions from both classical school of…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deviance is found in all types of societies. Some sociologists such as, Emile Durkheim, believe that deviance is universal and not abnormal in a society. Durkheim puts his ideas of deviance into a structural-functional theory, which sees society as a complex system whose parts work together to promote solidarity and stability. Whereas other sociologists, such as Alexander Liazos, believe that deviance is a result of social inequality. Liazos ideas fit into a social-conflict theory, which sees society as an arena of inequality that generates conflict and change.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Durkheim’s The Rules of Sociological Method, he mentions that crime is necessary…

    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drawing upon psychological positivism, discuss the ways in which crime might be considered normal in society. Normal is defined as “the usual, typical, or expected state or condition.” (Oxford Dictionaries | English, 2017) In reference to criminology, psychological positivism sees crime as a thing people are subjected to in every-day life and is ‘normal’ in that certain people are predisposed to crime due to underlying personality and psychological traits.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Crime makes you feel helpless and powerless. I’m not sure what benefit that has to society. But I also feel that Durkheim was right in that a Utopia is not possible but for me it is due to…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics