Gottfredson And Hirschi's General Theory Of Crime Essay

Great Essays
Introduction
Throughout the semester, we have been learning about the different types of theories of crime. From the least parsimony theory, to the most parsimony theory, Gottfredson and Hirschi 's general theory of crime. I decided to pick Gottfredson and Hirschi 's general theory of crime because, it 's the most accepted and most valid theories of crime.
Logical Consistency The six dimensions of self control that Gottfredson and Hirschi state are impulsive, risk taking, physical, simple, self centered, and temper. Someone who is impulsive, have a here and now orientation. They think before they take action on criminal opportunity, they tend to pursue non criminal immediate pleasures. Another dimension of self control are those who
…show more content…
Analogue behaviors are non criminal, but behaviors that satisfy immediate desires to the detriment of long term consequences. An example of an analogue behavior could be, smoking, drinking, use of drugs, etc… The part of the self-control theory where the scope is weak is specifically linking self control to deviant acts. This shows the ascertain relationship between self control and deviance in a generic fashion. However, it doesn 't show how self control is connected with specific acts of deviance. An important element of self control is preference for exciting and amazing experience. This is to an extent the preference for risk taking is characteristic of individuals, self control is most likely related to socially accepted form of risky behavior.
Parsimony of the theory
Throughout all the theories we have looked at this semester, the theory that is the most parsimony is the general theory of crime. The general theory of crims is the most parsimony due to its single cause of crime.It all begins with is the parenting is poor then it leads to lowself control, which in the end it will rise the oppertunity of crime and deliquency. These variables are very simple to understand the cause of crime, unlike the rest of theories that have more complex variables that lead to crime.
…show more content…
As the book Criminological Theory says, “For example, one study showed that the effects of low self control on intention to commit drunk driving and shoplifting were tied to individuals perceptions of pleasure and shame” ( Tibbetts & Hemmens 321). The study showed that people who have low self control have a significant lower levels of anticipated shame however, have higher levels perceived pleasure in committing both crimes. The result of these studies come to show that individuals that lack self control will lean toward gaining pleasure and taking advantage using other resources. Lean toward avoiding negative emotional feelings that are introduced through socialization such as

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Criminologists who believe in this theory also state that perceived violation benefits outweighs the punishment of committing a crime for a criminal. The theory implies that an increment of punishment severity would lower crime rate(Causes of Crime-ODU).Two subcategories of Choice Theory are Rational Choice Theory and Routine Activity Theory. Rational Choice Theory is the idea that societal behaviour patterns reflect individual choices and the pros and cons of their actions(Causes of Crime-ODU). Whereas Routine Activity Theory focuses on the likelihood of crimes occurring in certain situations(Causes of Crime-ODU). For example, you are more likely to be robbed on the streets than in a locked…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Major crime theories include; Temperament and Trait Biology theory, Personality and Trait Psychological theory, Psychoanalytic theory, Behaviorist theory, Social Learning theory, Cognitive theory, Social-Cognitive theory, and the Humanist/Interactionist theory. All criminologists, regardless of theoretical orientation, agree on some factors. First, they all recognize the importance of psychological development factors. Second, they are interested in the ways in which aggression and violence are learned through modeling and direct experience.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many theories in the field of criminology. There are the biological theories, the psychological theories, and the sociological theories. The biological theories connect violence and criminal tendencies with certain biological characteristics. A criminologist, William Sheldon, had a theory that criminal behavior was more common in those of athletic people than tall,skinny,stout,or unmuscular people.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Control theory concentrates on the elements that limit people from crime. They contend that all individuals have needs and desires that are more effectively fulfilled through crime than through legitimate channels. For instance, it is much less demanding to take cash than to work for it. So according to control theorists, crime requires no extraordinary clarification, and it is frequently the most practical approach to get what one needs. Instead of clarifying why individuals participate in crime, we have to clarify why they don't.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The General Theory of Crime assumes that lack of an individual’s self-control is the predominant factor behind criminal behavior. The low self-control in early childhood aspect of the theory places tremendous emphasis on parental upbringings, and further suggest that self-control is the result of early socialization in the family. Both…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This theory focuses on two pathways that individuals travel down, but instead of saying the reason for criminal activity is that we are “born” with it, they give a reason that says our environment and the interactions we have with those in our lives. They do not totally discount the fact that some individuals suffer from neuropsychological disadvantages, but these coupled with environmental and social aspects increase criminal behavior; not just these deficiencies alone cause it. One major difference in the two theories is that this one identifies life processes that we move through that has a direct impact on our behavior. These are called “turning points” and occur when we get married and when we have a meaningful career.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social learning theory argues that individuals learn through the people they most closely associate with. Control theory is different than the others because instead of asking why people commit crime they ask why people do not commit crime. Control theorist argue that it is easy to commit a crime and get what you want so it’s about people’s relationships and what they have learned that proves whether they have control or not. All of these theories attempt to explain the social causes of crime and with these theories people can try to solve problems in our society so that we can lower the crime rate and create a safer environment for everyone.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nonetheless, numerous theories can be defined towards defining what causes crime, but out of all, differential association theory seems to fit the criteria of answering such question. Likewise, a theory that is applicable towards explaining peer influences among deviant youths or the trigger of becoming a criminal. Rather this theory can identify the roots of criminality of an…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question one Informal social control, collective efficacy, and social capital all play an important role when it comes to preventing neighborhood crime efforts. Informal social control does not involve any formal social institutions such as the police. Instead, it involves a group of individuals outside the government spectrum that come together to try to prevent crime for the common good. This concept is often hard to achieve when individuals cannot conform and help define social norms.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Crime has a higher tendency to happen if any of the three factors above is present, independently of biology or genetics. The Rational Choice Theory The Rational Choice Theory suggests that an individual tends to introspectively weigh up the risk vs. reward of commiting a wrongdoing, which includes crimes like theft. The risk can be formal punishment, guilt, shame or withdrawal of a benefit (U2, p14).…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hirschi Crime Theory

    • 1699 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Leading theorist, Travis Hirschi, argued that previous theories on criminal behavior were asking the wrong theoretical questions. They were simply exploring the motives behind crimes and why individuals committed crimes. According to Lilly, Cullen, and Ball (2015), previous “theories did not explain who would be a delinquent and who would not be a delinquent” (p. 115). However, Hirschi brought attention to those individuals who were not committing crimes through asking the primary question of what is preventing people from committing crimes? Hirschi explained, “it is conforming behavior, not deviance, that we must explain” (Reid, 2012, pp.…

    • 1699 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The idea of self-concept can not solely be taken into account when explaining why some are more likely to engage in criminal activities, it ignores other social and genetic factors. Reckless himself stresses that the theory is more so sufficient for minor types of delinquency such as theft and that the containment theory is not able to explain extreme levels of crime. Nevertheless to refute this, it is claimed that there has not been any other previous research testing the assumption that the containment theory can not explain major delinquencies. Also, the theory does not appear to explain those criminal activities that are deemed ‘normal’ in certain deviant communities. It may be that such behaviour is encouraged in some families and communities.…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Sociological theories of crime caution focus on three major parts of Sociological theories that deal with crime and delinquency. They are strains, social learning, and control theories. These theories explain the crime that is based on the social environment that includes family, peers, school, the community workplace etc. these three theories focus on different from one another in numerous ways: the theories focus on different features of the social environment, the theories even offer different accounts of why the social environment causes crime, and they even focus on explaining the individual differences in crime while others attempt to clarify the group changes in crime also why some of the public communities have higher crime rates than…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are three primary theories in psychology which help to give meaning in defining what is identified as crime. Although the notion of defining crime is not a simple matter, these three theories shed light on the subject. The most straightforward answer to contextualising crime depends on factors or variables within a society. In today's society the most common meaning 'crime' has depends on three views. The Consensus View, The Conflict View, and The Interactionist View.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most theories in criminology aim to explain why one commits crime. However, Hirschi’s social control theory allows us to think of crime from another perspective - why does one choose not to commit crime. Hirschi thinks that we are all animals and it is in our nature to commit crime; thus he wants to find out what exactly convinced us not to commit crime. He has come up with four elements that determine if we have the self control to choose not to commit crime: attachment to others; commitment to conventionality; involvement in conventional activity; and belief in the rules of society. He thinks that without anyone of the elements, one will have no self control and choose to commit crime.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays