Wendy's Arguments Against The Surveillance System

Superior Essays
The two readings are focused on the same issue, that is, the surveillance systems that are being employed in the states in America in an effort to improve the security of the people or in a bid to make the people feel that they are safe. These surveillance systems are supposed to be used to detect suspicious individuals in the society and thus the law enforcement agencies can deal with such cases before crime is committed by suspects. The surveillance systems are growing and many are being adapted to the public sectors and are being used to monitor the people in a certain region their behaviors and the likeliness of suspicious activities. Surveillance systems have been updated from those that existed few years back and now have features such …show more content…
They claim that the people only are to use them because certain events happen and they get intimidated or frightened and think that these surveillance systems will make them feel safer. However all this are false promises by this systems. According to ACLU, these systems have so many errors that render them inefficient in their task of security. Good example is the facial recognition systems that are used in Tampa, Florida. The systems have shown great failure and cannot even differentiate between the male and the female images. These errors are further made worse by the human errors. The database that is used for the facial recognition systems does not only include suspects but also individuals ho the police are willing to interrogate. This makes it harder for the system t identifies criminals and innocent people find themselves entangled in this mess ("Trading Liberty for Illusion Analysis Essay Example | Topics, Sample Papers & Articles Online for Free," n.d.). Another shortcoming of these systems is that they are prone to abuse by the officers running them. These officers use them to stalk other people and also intimidate them. These systems have been compared with various leaders in history who passed various laws, acts and bills by instilling fear to other members of the public. The surveillance system does the same. Wendy views these systems as threats to privacy, liberty and physical safety which don’t go in line to the reasons they are put in place. People adapt the invasive and repressive security technologies not because they want to but because they are afraid to challenge them. Most people take comfort in the false promises of these

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    A Surveillance Society In the article Surveillance Society by William E. Thompson, there are imperfect ways to spy on citizens around the world. The government is finding ways to use surveillance to notice what is going on around the world. But some actions that they've taking lately aren't really "protecting ones privacy. " It can be many ways that unsolved crimes could be solved so increasing all the technology in the world can be safe and unsafe.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In “Bigger Monsters Weaker Chains” by Jay Stanley and Barry Steinhardt, are arguing that the United States has increased its methods of surveillance with new technology advances and we need new privacy laws. Some concerns are video surveillance, data surveillance, government surveillance, and communications surveillance. There has been an increase in video surveillance since 9/11. Cameras are not just in important public places like the Statue of Liberty or the National Mall but also in the streets.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    With today’s technology, there is a rift between technology and personal privacy. Currently, no precise federal law prohibits surveillance cameras, but there is a fear with common-law confidentiality rights, which frequently leads to an evaluation of a person's "reasonable expectation of privacy. " Expectation of privacy is not an issue when overt cameras are used. A person’s expectation of privacy is also not void when on public campuses, such as Grand Valley. Surveillance cameras in public locations such as sidewalks or parking lots are no problem because there is not an expectation of privacy in such areas.…

    • 111 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These electronic surveillance activities clearly violate the right to privacy that most Americans expect when they use simple, modern, and common…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jhennah Gill Brenda Volk English– 102- 61 9 Sept 2017 Summary of “Five Reasons Why Police Body-Cams Are a Terrible Idea” In Virgil Vaduva’s article “Five Reasons Why Police Body-Cams Are a Terrible Idea,” originally published on Truth Voice on June 16, 2015, libertarian security professional Vaduva argues that there is not sufficient evidence to propose that body cameras worn by police will do much to help the over-all public. In Vaduva’s article, he wrote about five reasons, which I will be mentioning, shortly. Vaduva’s article discusses five reasons, which are facial recognition and expanded surveillance, real-time tracking of individuals, footage integrity, exoneration of police actions, and empower crony manufacturers at the expense…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Who, What, When, Where and Why am I Being Watched In George Orwell’s 1984 and Phillip K. Dick’s “Minority Report” the governments are obsessed with surveillance of their people in order to keep their control over their citizens. Thus their citizen’s privacy suffered to the point where it is nonexistent. With the assistance of technology, the governments are able to keep citizens oppressed and Orwell and Dick openly express their negative views on government surveillance. 1984 is a story written in the 1940s that shows what England would look in a totalitarian government.…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Technology is becoming so advanced in today’s society. Officers are starting to wear body cameras to record what takes place on duty. In a piece written for The New Yorker, Veronica Majerol has written about the use of theses cameras and if they will benefit today’s society. Many say this will help from the police not obeying citizens rights, while other believe this will raise a concern for privacy. There is no question that something needs to be done, and theses cameras will give the public truth on what is going on.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In addition, Fieldstadt reports that police officers who wear body cameras are truly law enforcers protecting the civil rights of all citizens. A good reference to this…

    • 1298 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Luckily, people are starting to create solutions to police the police. With the use of body cameras and other technologies, we the people, no longer have to live in fear. Civilians took it upon themselves to use a non-biased form of protection: cameras. Cameras create a second witness that will never lie.…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There Is No Such Thing as Privacy “It was even conceivable that they watched us all the time.” These are the words Winston Smith and all of Oceania had to live by. George Orwell’s 1984 warns us about totalitarian regimes. The government, Big Brother, abolishes the citizen’s freedom and their own personal privacy, and even into their personal thoughts.…

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Facial identification is attractive for law enforcement. It can be used in combination with current surveillance camera organization to hunt for know offenders. Face recognition is secret and non invasive, opposed to other biometrics like finger prints, retina scans, and iris scans. This is particularly important in combination with the law because faces are careful public. Complete photo databases from mug shots or driver’s licenses already exist.…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most critics of surveillance argue about how it is an abuse of power, a violation of people 's privacy, and most importantly, unconstitutional, while proponents of surveillance claim the benefit of surveillance is a reduction in the probability of high-cost events such as terrorism. Government surveillance programs, when conducted in controlled situations and closely audited by independent organizations, do not directly harm innocent civilians, especially when they benefit the safety of the general public. Surveillance, by definition, is the act of carefully watching someone or something especially in order to prevent or detect a crime. If that definition was used when discussing the issue of government surveillance, most public safety activities,…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Society has always thought that it had the freedom and privacy it was enlightened to have in the United States of America. Most of society has not been enlightened with knowledge that they are most likely being watched all the time. Just like in the novel 1984, by George Orwell, the citizens are always being watched and have no privacy for themselves. Privacy is something that individuals greatly value but do not truly consider until it is taken away. The totalitarian government 's need to control, manipulate, and subvert the rights of its citizens in 1984 mirrors the United States government operation today.…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The parallels are undeniable. We live in a world in a world where it’s comical to say you are alone and where privacy cannot be purchased with a set of drapes. Government surveillance has resulted in loss of privacy, loss of individualism, and conformity, evident throughout 1984 and today’s…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Before polices used the facial-recognition system in the streets, the promise of the system would be able to recognize the criminal, and whether if that person is male or female; however, there are a failing of it, when it could not give the right results as the promise, it gave the error that it could not determine the gender, and the criminal. In the other hand, the Economist gave different point by giving readers examples that came from experts whose had experiences by working with the surveillance system and how did they say about it. According to the Economist’s article, they gave a name of an expert…

    • 1447 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays