Violence During The American Revolution

Improved Essays
Violence is visible to our everyday lives with events such as war and fights. These violent events have tragic effects, although some may occur with a short lived prosperity. Mahatma Gandhi sums up this concept as he stated: “I object to violence because when it appears to do good, the good is only temporary; the evil it does is permanent”. For example, one of the most well known wars in American history, the American Revolution, further proves Gandhi’s point. The British had a well trained army, thus, allowing them to be victorious in multiple battles, although they lost the war. On the contrary of their success, the British suffered the consequences of the war, such as losing a large amount of money that would later greatly impact their economy. …show more content…
Although Nazi found success in various battles during the war, their violent act will left a forever scar in the lives of the Jewish people that they have impacted. As their victory in battle stopped, and the war comes to an end, the deconstruction of Jewish people is permanent, as many died and suffered, while reducing the population of Jewish people for many years to come. Gandhi’s quote explains to us that during violent acts, the positive outcomes only lasted a limited time, just like the battles won by the British and Nazis. On the other hand, the long term negative effects were everlasting, such as the deconstruction of the British economy and the damage of the Jews. From these examples and Gandhi’s explanation, we can infer that the “good” outcomes of violence is not worth the “evil”

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Thesis: The barbaric acts committed by the British allowed a belief of justice through non-violence which could attract anyone in which Gandhi’s passive resistance movement proved be successful. The belief of justice strengthened Gandhi’s followers by allowing them to disobey laws which were against their beliefs. In Document A which is titled Mohamdas Gandhi on Religion, the main points are two quotes that he has said. The two quotes refer to his views on his beliefs and what he believes the goal of religion to be.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Redcoats and Rebels: The American Revolution through British Eyes by Christopher Hibbert is a novel told from the point of view of the British. It breaks the normal tradition of telling the American Revolution from the point of view of the Americans. Instead, the Redcoats and the British are portrayed as the protagonists. However, the storytelling was neutral and didn’t tell anything apart from fact. The history went in chronological order in order to better tell the story.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    History has always prevailed itself by showing people fighting over territorial sanctions, ideas revolving around politics as well as the simplicity of faith itself. It’s these motions ad violence that affect us as humans. It greatly impacts the ideology of political and economical interest to society today, a pursuit that radicalizes a forth coming of how wars will leave a rationalized foot print in history to come. Through wars one is able to assert their dominance and through that one is able to force ideas and beliefs. To some, war represents a rational pursuit to gain economic interests, while for others it remains an irrational destruction of property and futures to others.…

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Non-violence works as a strategy to bring about change because it is morally and strategically superior to any other strategy, and because it works for changes that will benefit all people. Non-violence, as a morally and strategically superior method to bring about change is first seen in Document 1. Document 1 is a letter from Mohandas Gandhi to the English governor in India where Gandhi explains why he plans to use non-violence and how doing so will make British recognize the “wrong they have done to India,” (Doc 1/ Letter to Irwin). Also in the document, Gandhi points out that the physical harming of a peaceful entity violates the morals of nearly every civilization around the Globe. This means that by using non-violence, Gandhi’s movement is morally superior to his opposition, which put the morals and reputation of the opposition into play, coaxing the other side to comply with Gandhi’s requests.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The third paragraph inquires about beneficial aspects of nonviolence, claiming that “nonviolence is more powerful than violence”. It also contributes by stating, “nonviolence provides the opportunity to stay on the offensive”, allowing for a peaceful and innocent reputation to help achieve success within a conflict. Contrarily, paragraph four explains the detrimental effects of pure rapid violence. Creating animosity and pain, futile violence results in “escalated” issues with “many injuries”, “deaths”, or “demoralization”. Chavez applies a compare and contrast method in order to lure the audience towards his personal mindset, which particularly favors nonviolence.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the passages "Letter from Birmingham Jail" by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr and "Speech at the March on Washington" by Josephine Bake and "form Letter to Viceroy, Lord Irwin" each passage shows many examples of equality, and how non-violence can bring equal rights. To achieve true freedom one most use non-violence means in order to find a peaceful solution. To begin with discrimination people should respect the religion or color of the person and not make them less. Based on the "Speech at the March on Washington" by Josephine Baker on lines 42-45, Baker expressed "I tell you I have walked into the places of king's and queens and into the houses of presidents and much more.." This shows that she went to another country.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The American Revolution- a period of political tension- erupted in the 1700’s as a mass upheaval of the thirteen colonies against the British Empire. The British Empire acquired territory in North America after the French and Indian War. The empire needed money to support its troops in North America, so they decided to create the Stamp Act of 1765, or the first internal tax levied on the colonists. Further tensions occurred during the revolution: the Boston Massacre of 1770, the Boston Tea Party of 1773, and the Conventional Constitution of 1786.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Steven Pinker’s “Violence Vanquished” is an article that focuses on the decline of violence since the start of the twenty-first century. He argues that violence today is relatively nonexistent in comparison to that of the past. However, deaths from rapes, shootings, and fights are still occurring today. Pinker uses a chart that estimates the deaths of people from the twentieth century to the twenty-first century (Pinker 701). The early 1900s included countless deaths from wars, slavery, and other violent conflicts.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Disobedience is often a term with a negative connotation. People generally associate it with going against authority and just acting how one feels they should. However, when the word is applied to history it can have a different context. Any changes through history were the result of someone going against a common view and standing up for what they believe in. Changes only happen when societies are willing to disobey the norm.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “[People] find it difficult to grasp the idea of nonresistance”(Doc G). There is an adequate amount of evidence from historical examples that nonviolence can be an effective and conclusive method of social action, and this can be shown through Gandhi and and King’s strategic methods. Gandhi brought independence to India and King brought civil rights to the United States. Ultimately, deep religious conviction was the underlying source of nonviolent success.…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Starting in 1776, the American Revolution served as a launching pad for a new nation. The abuses of monarchical Britain, predominantly lack of representation and inability to effect change, shaped the ideals of the fledgling nation. Because of the American Revolution, there was radical social and economic change. The most prominent change occurred politically, its ideals leading eventually to the First Amendment. This amendment grants the citizens of the United States the right to freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances, or the right to make a complaint to, or seek the assistance of, one 's government, without fear of punishment or reprisals.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “A History of Violence,” Steven Pinker argues that violence continues to diminish. Pinker goes as far back as biblical times to prove evidence of our vicious past. He even analyzes murder rates from present day compared to the fourteenth century to find the present day completely outnumbered. Kings and Queens of sixteenth-century Paris watched cats being strangled and burned for entertainment. All examples from this essay show the violence that mankind was once accustomed to.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But, what if a conflict can’t be resolved? One needs to be able to resort to violence. Benjamin Franklin could have learned this principal from Machiavelli and Sun…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In relation to his definition of decolonization, Fanon shows that when the fight for national liberation happens, violence should be expected. This expectation comes from the initial encounter between the settlers and the natives. When the settlers take over the country, they did it through the use of violent force, creating hostility between the settlers and the natives. This causes the relationship between the settlers and the natives to be a violent one from the start. This strain in the relationship is further perpetuated when the settlers rule the country by the language of force.…

    • 1825 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Great Britain was left with a massive war debt following the war…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays