• Home Page
  • Utilitarianism, Deontology, And Virtue Theory

Utilitarianism, Deontology, And Virtue Theory

Superior Essays
Show More
Do I think utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue theory is right? Utilitarianism is acts that make people happy are right, and acts that cause pain to people are bad actions. Deontology is where an act must be done from a sense of duty to have moral worth. Virtue theory is says people must act how other people would act in that situation. These theories all seem to have one flaw in common. The only consider the actions of someone and not the intentions as well. I think actions are very important, but so are the intentions someone has. There are other factors that are wrong with the individual theories, but they all have one problem in common. If intentions were taking into consideration, it would make the theories seem more accurate and have …show more content…
If a person’s actions make themselves and others happy, then it is right. If someone’s actions cause people pain and sadness, then it is wrong. The only problem I see with this theory though, is it does not consider the intentions or motives someone may have. My reason being, if someone had the intentions of harming or murdering someone. They get close to committing the crime, but they get caught and it doesn’t happen, this theory says they did nothing wrong because they did cause harm. If this were to happen, the person who attempted the crime would be in trouble and would get consequences from their actions. That is why I say this theory is fairly accurate, but not completely since it only takes actions into consideration and not the intentions and motives …show more content…
I do not think act is the only thing that determines what is right or wrong. I think there are other factors that contribute to that decision. An example that I am sticking with strongly is the act of self-defense. If someone were to break into my home while I was there, with the intention to rob me or even harm me in some way. My reaction would be to call the police and defend myself if I needed to. If the intruder were to try and harm me, I would defend myself. Normally, that would be acceptable because it was self-defense, but according to deontology theory, that is wrong. I do not think this theory is very accurate because there are circumstances where this theory does not

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Bernie Character Analysis
    • 1569 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Bernie Character Analysis

    This theory states that people justify themselves when they break the law to explain why it was okay for them to do what the illegal act (Barkan, 2011). Sykes and Matza have established five different techniques that they say people use to justify their illegal behavior. These techniques are denial or responsibility, denial of injury, denial of the victim, condemnation of the condemners, and appeal to higher loyalty. The techniques that apply most to this film are denial of the victim and denial of responsibility (Barkan, 2011). Denial of the victim states that “even if offenders concede that they are about to harm someone or something, they may reason that their target deserves the harm” (Barkan, 2011, pg. 194).…

    • 1569 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Deontologists Trust That Morality Involves Moral Obligation
    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Deontologists Trust That Morality Involves Moral Obligation

    1c) Deontologists trust that morality involves obligation. We have moral obligations to do things which it is on the whole correct to do and moral obligations not to get things done which it isn't right to do. In the case of something is correct or wrong doesn't depend on its outcomes. Or maybe, an activity is correct or wrong in itself.…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Classic Utilitarianism Analysis
    • 96 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Classic Utilitarianism Analysis

    Utilitarianism is based on the consequences resulting from actions. Moral actions solely rely on the resulting consequences. Pleasures vary regarding quality and quantity. However, utilitarianism theory gives the quality aspect an upper hand. “Human beings are not satisfied with pleasures they have because they consider them to be of low quality” (Rosen, 2005.…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Virtue And Duty-Based Ethics
    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Virtue And Duty-Based Ethics

    1) With duty-based ethics it’s about obedience of law, performing an act morally because it’s out of duty. The act is based on the fact that it’s our obligation, we do the duty out of oughtness. Virtue ethics is different from duty-based ethics as one is not acting out of oughtness or duty, but out of motivation and feelings. Acting on moral character. Virtue ethics would be to perform an act for example out of love for a mother who is ill; you take care of her because of the love you have for her not because it your duty.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Virtue Based Ethic Research Paper
    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Virtue Based Ethic Research Paper

    A known terrorist has been captured, and the threat of an attack on American soil is possible. As a utilitarian should security forces torture the terrorist to get him to reveal the details of the attack? I believe as utilitarian yes go ahead and torture him. Make his life awful and unbearable so that he understands the pain he is attempting to unfold on American civilians. Then he may realize that his actions are bad and he will give up the details.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Deontological Ethics Inherently Wrong
    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Deontological Ethics Inherently Wrong

    By consequentialist ethics, the church members’ prejudice toward the poor and their body language to despise him were not ethical actions. It’s because consequences determine the right or wrong actions. Their reaction didn’t produce the best results but the death of the poor man. Its consequence didn’t bring happiness to anyone. Consequentialist utilize an evaluation of results while deontological ethics utilize rule and principles (Hollinger 28).…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarian And Rights Ethics Analysis
    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Utilitarian And Rights Ethics Analysis

    In the following paragraph’s, I will examine A-1s trailer predicament using the utilitarian and rights ethics theories as a framework for my analysis, argument and finally decision. To begin my analysis, I will define my decision as two separate course of action, or COAs. I will call them COA 1 and COA 2. COA 1 defined is acceptance of the defect. Under COA 1, A-1 will doing nothing about the trailer defect, accept risks and be prepared to provide the complete monetary value estimated.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Act Consequentialism: The Most Plausible Moral Theory
    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Act Consequentialism: The Most Plausible Moral Theory

    Many people have justifications for why they do certain things. Some justifications are based off of happiness, desires, god or morals. People who use happiness and desires as their justification use theories of the good. While those who use god and morals use theories of morality. Some theories that fall into the theories of morality are the divine command theory, consequentialism, and social contract theory.…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Utility Monster: The Ideas Of Utilitarianism
    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Utility Monster: The Ideas Of Utilitarianism

    Utilitarianism is interesting because it takes primarily a consequentialist approach to ethic looking at the ends to something and looks at the pros or cons of an action, or what causes the most happiness versus the amount of generating pain from an action. Even though it sounds simple to compare the amount of happiness versus pain the equation that we have to use for utilitarianism does not always work the that it should and other flaws that we will go over in this essay taking an unusual stance on the matter, questioning the utility monster but also criticizes utilitarianism later but also saying that it is the best that we have currently have. The idea of a utility monster is not a valid objection against utilitarianism and can be worked…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Endorse Virtue Theory
    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Endorse Virtue Theory

    Virtue Ethics In this paper, I endorse virtue ethics because I find it to be the most accurate moral theory that we have considered thus far. One persuasive moral theory is utilitarianism. Philosophers who endorse this theory argue that the greatest good for utilitarian’s is pleasure. However, pleasure causes problems for utilitarian’s because it is considering the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Analysis Of Bernard Williams A Critique Of Utilitarianism
    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of Bernard Williams A Critique Of Utilitarianism

    Final Exam 1. In “A Critique of Utilitarianism”, Bernard Williams argues against the fundamental characteristics of utilitarianism and believes that the notion of ends justifying the means are a way of representing the doctrine of negative responsibility which can lead to consequences from the choices we make/do not make (663). As a result, we are all responsible for the consequences that we fail to prevent as well as the ones we brought upon ourselves. That is, in each case the choice on whether an action is right is determined by its consequences (661). Williams gives the example of killing one villager to save 19 others (664) in which he critiques the different principles of utilitarianism and integrity - the moral righteousness that is…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Deontology And Utilitarianism Essay
    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Deontology And Utilitarianism Essay

    The use of animals in research is widely accepted, particularly within the scientific community. However, with the rise of new technologies and growing concern over animal welfare, the ethics of animal experimentation and the extent to which it is practiced has increasingly come into question. Although animal experimentation is regulated to prevent excessive suffering, opponents argue that these measures are insufficient. Proponents of animal research argue that knowledge gained from it and the various applications for it justify the unethical manner by which that knowledge is obtained. This argument neglects critical moral considerations rooted in deontology and utilitarianism which condemn the unethical use of animals for the advancement…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Case Study On Virtue Ethics
    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Case Study On Virtue Ethics

    the stance of the company and Luke’s coworkers. The reason behind my recommendation is that by using the categorical imperative from the view of the company and its stakeholders Luke can ensure that the inevitable damage that would have otherwise occurred would not actually occur. At the present time there is no proof that Owen would actually suffer a loss if Luke doesn’t tell Owen about the future decline in property values. Thus, from the information that is currently known, it is best to go with the categorical imperative from the company’s point of view.…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Routine Activity Theory And Rational Choice Theory
    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 5 Works Cited

    Routine Activity Theory And Rational Choice Theory

    I would classify the Rational Choice Theory as premeditated crime; the criminal actually has a thought process of if they will commit a crime. A good example would be a homeless man late at night sleeping in a city alley, a deviant criminal walks by and sees the man and no one else around. You have the offender, the target, and no guardian so the criminal murders the homeless man. This was solely a crime of chance, because of all three necessary elements just happened to be in the same place at the same time. I would compare this to the Routine Activity Theory.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 5 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Similarities Between Deontology And Utilitarianism
    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Similarities Between Deontology And Utilitarianism

    Utilitarianism relies on experience and our responsibility to maximize pain over pleasure. Therefore, the motive behind the action is not important if the ends or consequences were justified with the greatest amount of good. As a result, individuals have the moral responsibility to produce the most benefits for the community, even if it does not align with their happiness. Deontology relies on universal knowledge and respecting other peoples decisions. This theory ensures that each person is treated with respect and has the ability to make their own decisions.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings