Now that Lars Aanning has been working as a patient advocate in a sense that he is exposing medical cover ups he is now displaying deontological ethics. Deontological ethics is collectively known as duty based ethics where the consequences of the action will determine what is right. Some of these duties that are due to society are telling the truth and keeping promises to others. Based on this criteria, it is now more important to Lars Aanning that the truth is exposed upfront regardless of the consequences that could arise because of the truth.
Justice: According to the text book and our notes justice is the fair distribution of benefits and risks of all parties involved. The benefits were all given to the doctor that Lars lied on behalf, while the person who was filing the malpractice lawsuit was not benefited by the ruling of the trial
Beneficence is idea of balancing good and benefits over risk. As a medical professional you are striving to do provide benefits to your patients in the best way you can. Although the beneficence of the doctor was upheld seeing as his benefit was in mind, the best was not done in interest of the client filing the malpractice