Antoine Jones Case Summary

Superior Essays
Introduction
The US justice systems can be described through a critical analysis of a case law. The legal researcher is supposed to understand the police procedures applied in the case investigation and arrest, the court proceedings and the punitive measures applied. The model of thought that the jury applies, the defence that the defendant uses, and the process the plaintiff presents facts and evidence are given keen consideration (Reichel, 2002).This paper uses US Supreme Court case (US v JONES, 2012) where a suspected drug trafficker was found guilty and punished to a life sentence in a bid of understanding the US justice systems.
Description of the case
Antoine Jones, was a suspect identified as a prime suspect in some cases of drug trafficking. The government investigated the issue through the involvement of the FBI agents and metropolitan police. A search warrant was provided to search the premises of Antoine Jones by the court. The search was done through installation of various gadgets including CCTV and GPS on his property. Then case
…show more content…
It was investigated since 2005 and the evidence was provided to the court. The defendant tried to scapegoat a fact that the government violated the fourth amendment severally. The government objected to the claims and finally won the case. The government’s evidence was seen as valid, following that the minor case of negligence was not substantial to the case. JONES was held accountable for the drug money, the cocaine, and the cocaine base that were found in his procession. Jones is serving s life imprisonment term in prison (US v JONES, 2012). The case is a good example of the US justice systems in action, and it is a lesson to the police, the court, and the government. It also prepares criminals who try to hide their criminal activities behind tort during investigation that even very optimistic chances fail (LaFave,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This hearing determines if there is sufficient evidence that exists against an offender to continue the criminal justice process. The judge in this step searches for a probable cause to prove a crime was committed and the suspect accomplished doing so. Nevertheless, if a probable cause is determined, the accused suspect is held for trial on the information, which results in formal charging. In federal cases and other states, there is a grand jury that is empanelled to determine if there is enough evidence to file indictment charges against the suspect with the crimes. However if the grand jury finds there is sufficient evidence to warrant a trial it issues a true bill, if not it issues a no bill and he or she is filtered out of the criminal justice network (Appalachian State University, n.d).…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This is important because it shows the judge attempting to make the defendant realize the crimes he committed. The themes of crime and violence go hand in hand because this hate crime was very brutal and could have an impact on anyone. No one could ever imagine their loved ones getting abused in such a horrible way. The setting of the court room at the trial also helped to establish the theme. At the end of his speech the judge states, “The Court finds it appropriate, therefore, that sentenced be ordered as follows: As to Count Three, that being felony murder with robbery, you are to serve a period of imprisonment for the term of your natural life.…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many times in the book, Piper Kerman shares her frustration about the dehumanization that occurs in her prison and how the justice system is organized. Kerman was indicted on charges of drug smuggling and money laundering. A conspiracy charge accuses a group of people plotting to commit a crime. The accused are usually brought to court by someone who has exposed their criminal acts in exchange for immunity. Under a conspiracy charge, the defendant is sentenced for the total amount of drugs and crime involved in an operation, not for their own role in it, whether small or big.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this article, David Skarbek refutes the widespread assumption that prisons are filled with violent thugs who cannot act irrationally. He demonstrates how criminals who break the rules and have been sentenced to long-term or life sentence are capable of creating rules, explicit and implicit, to establish an informal governance system that would serve them. Precisely, Skarbek attempts to explain “state-making” and systems of governance based on prison gangs in California. He argues that the Mexican Mafia gang, a Mexican-American criminal prison organization, has set up a governance system that facilitates drug trafficking conducted by Hispanic drug dealers in the streets of Los Angeles. In other words, Skarbek claims that order has been instituted…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article is written by Steven Greenhut. In his article he talks about a prominent California judge Alex Kozinski and how he talks about the unfairness of our justice system in one of his articles. Both of the gentlemen articles depict a system which tilts heavily in favor of district attorneys, incarcerates thousands of innocent people and fails to hold accountable prosecutors who abuse their power (Greenhut 1). But what we want to focus on most importantly is the incarceration of the innocent ones. According to Kosinski the real reason why many innocent people are behind bars is because police have vast discretion about what leads to pursue.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This long-accepted statement of the law has come under increasing strain in recent years, especially in relation to suppliers of drugs present at the death of the drug-taker, but authorities which are to the effect that the accused remains guilty even when the victim refuses medical treatment may be seen as similar. Some causation cases exemplify the desire of the courts to convict those who have created dangerous situations even when the actus reus and mens rea are not contemporaneous. Once the prosecution has proved causation, all the other elements of the actus reus must be…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Local police coerced Ron Williamson into confessing false statements by using Williamson’s bipolar disorder to their advantage. Due to the bias contained within the Ada jury, Williamson was convicted and sentenced to death. Ron Williamson would spend the next eleven years of his life awaiting his punishment.…

    • 2310 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before moving forward and exploring deeper into the aforementioned problems circling Darryl’s hunt trial, it would be best to give a brief understanding of the case. The case centers on a young African American male, who was convicted twice for the sexual assault and murder of a white female, Deborah Sykes. The documentary displays everything that led to Hunt’s sentencing, and shows that Darryl’s 20 years in prison should have never occurred. There's more, the documentary illustrates the important points that led to his incarceration. while analyzing the State v. Hunt’s case, it can be said that this clearly resembles some form of racial hoax; the argument is straightforward, the police, as…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Miscarriage of justice refers to individuals who are convicted of a crime they did not commit. The causes of such wrongful convictions may often be linked to police bullying and corruption, narrow minded judges and well payed lawyers. The cases are often made worse by a one-sided media. Robson utilises comments made by Lord Denning during the appeals process of the ‘Birmingham Six’ to present the extent of the issue of miscarriages of justice. Lord Denning stated if the men win, their convictions were wrong.…

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Specifically, this bench memorandum should serve as a reference for District Court judges on how to draft jury instructions about these laws. Statement of Facts During a grand jury investigation into Philip Musgrave in June 1976, the District Court called Robert Dunn, Musgrave’s fellow inmate, to testify about Musgrave’s involvement in drug-related crimes. The District Court gave Dunn a grant of immunity…

    • 2153 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays