Lindbergh Baby Case Study

Improved Essays
This essay will discuss and provide an analysis how the three main components of the criminal justice system: Police, Courts, and Corrections apply to the 1932 Lindbergh Baby Case. In addition, this essay will discuss how first appearance, preliminary hearing, and arraignment apply to the Lindbergh Baby Case. Finally, this essay will discuss adjudication, sentencing, and corrections pertaining to the Lindbergh baby kidnapping.
In 1927, Charles Lindbergh and his family had received a lot of attention after he flew nonstop across the Atlantic Ocean from New York City to Paris. Due to this remarkable event, Charles Lindbergh became an American hero and wealth soon followed. The Lindbergh’s were followed by people throughout the world can became
…show more content…
The prosecution is to prove without a reasonable doubt that the accused is guilty while the defense is to refute evidence by the prosecution. The judge oversees both the prosecution and defense to be sure a trial is fair, and all evidence is admissible to be considered by the jury in deciding a verdict. In the Lindbergh Baby Kidnapping case, the court system is seen when Hauptmann has his first appearance in the courts and is indicted by the Supreme Court on charges of extortion of $50,000 from Charles Lindbergh. In a preliminary hearing at the Hunterdon County Courthouse in New Jersey, grand jurors unanimously voted to indict Hauptman for murder in 1934 (Linder, 2017). Two weeks after being charged with extortion, Hauptmann learned at the arraignment about being charged with murder as …show more content…
This evidence was circumstantial and included handwriting samples which matched the handwriting on the ransom notes, tool marks on the ladder matching tools owned by the accused, and the same type of wood from the ladder found in his attic. On January 3, 1935 the trial of Hauptmann began in Flemington, New Jersey and lasted roughly five weeks. The judge oversaw the trial and due to a guilty verdict returned on February 13, 1935, the accused was declared guilty of murder in the first degree. Once a verdict had been handed down by the jury, the sentencing phase of the case begins. After the legal evidence of the factual issues involved in this case, the adjudication was the death penalty. Adjudication is defined as “the legal process of resolving a dispute” (REFERENCE). Furthermore, aspects of the court system which can be applied are appeals. Hauptmann and the defense team appealed the verdict and sentence. Unfortunately for Hauptmann, on December 9, 1935, the Supreme Court of the State of New Jersey upheld the lower courts verdict of guilty. During the appeals and resentencing phase of the Hauptmann trial, another component of the criminal justice system is seen, that is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    William Heffernan faced a few moral dilemmas when he was working as assistant to the District Attorney. One in particular was when he was faced with a moral challenge in the case of a defendant Heffernan presumed to be guilty, but had been denied a fair trial by jury. Heffernan was confronted with the decision of whether or not to challenge an appeal made by the defense so the defendant could have a fair trial by jury. But with a new trial, the defendant stood a chance of winning his trial since the previous witnesses were out of the country. Then a presumed murderer would be free on the streets.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the 17th of December 1986, Olaf Dietrich arrived in Melbourne from a flight from Thailand and was charged the next day with four counts of drug trafficking. He was alleged to have swallowed 70 grams of heroin in small packets in attempt to smuggle them through customs. Olaf Dietrich was found, in his first trial, guilty by a jury of importing no less than a trafficable amount of heroin as pursuant to section 233B of the Customs Act of 1901. Dietrich at first alleged that the drugs had been planted by the police. He was found guilty of two other counts and sentenced in the Victorian County Court.…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Opinion Ms. Justice Martinez delivers the opinion of the court. Appellant stands convicted of murdering Mr. Thompkins and possession of an illegal firearm. The Supreme Court of New Jersey found the conviction valid based primarily upon the confession unlawfully obtained from the appellant and the evidence brought to the court which was also unlawfully collected at the victim’s home. On December 24, the Ocean County Sherriff’s department was called to a wellness check of Mr. Thompkins.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Egelhoff. Ann German represented the respondent, and the petitioner (Montana) was represented by Joseph Mazurek. At the end of the trial, Egelhoff was charged with two counts of “premeditated murder”. Which in Montana is a crime essentially defined by knowing that you are purposely committing a murder (LLI, 3).…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Danbury, CT: Grolier, 2005. Ryan Jr, Bernard. “Leopold and Loeb Trial:1924.” Great American Trials. Ed.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The 1920s was a time for change and celebration, filled with individuals that had made an impact on the society, including Charles Lindbergh. A man who had changed aviation forever. However, there was another figure in France, that was known to have equal talent to Charles Lindbergh. The United States press called Jean Mermoz, France’s Lindbergh. Jean Mermoz and Charles Lindbergh were brilliant and courageous aviators who strove to do great things.…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Sacco And Vanzetti Essay

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages

    “It took them only a short time to reach their verdict. “Guilty of murder in the first degree,” said the foreman of the jury” (David 15). The jury disregarded all of the reasonable doubt shown, and declared them guilty without even much deliberation. Despite this verdict, the defense had expected this and were ready to appeal the verdict. New evidence arose after the trial, and this evidence should have cleared the two of all guilt.…

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Style of Cause and Citation: R. v. Paterson,(2017) SCC 15 Court: “Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) and Court of Appeal of British Columbia (British Columbia’s Court of Appeal) Facts of the case: Following an agreement with the appellant to affect a “no case” seizure if he surrenders three marihuana roaches. The police make a warrantless search and entry by police into the home of the appellant. Once inside, the police found a bulletproof vest, a firearm and drugs (R. v. Paterson, (2017)). They arrested the appellant and then obtained a tele-warrant to search his apartment, which led to the discovery of other firearms and drugs.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Oj Simpson Fast Facts

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Following less than five hours of discussion on October 2, 1995, the jury returned to the courtroom the next morning to announce that they found the defendant not guilty of the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. Members of the jury felt that because the gloves did not fit on the Juice’s hands, he could not have been guilty of killing Nicole and Ron (“O.J. Simpson Fast Facts”). The prosecution felt defeated, while the defense rejoiced. The Brown and Goldman families were outraged, the Simpson family felt relief. The trial was over, but the fight would never end.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R V Heale Case Study

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Justice was balanced to the victims, the offender and society within the case R v Siale [2017] NSWSC. Justice was served for the victim as the offender received a lengthy sentence for the crime committed. The offender gained justice as he had a fair trial in the eyes of the court. Justice was also received for society as they maintain the safety of the community, but also the rehibition of the offender to become a better member of society. Justice was served for each party.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ireland V Brady Summary

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) Facts of the Case: John Leo Brady was arrested, tried and found guilty in a Maryland court for murder. The other man Donald Boblit had a separate trial. During Brady’s trial, he testified that even though he was involved with the robbery that Boblit was the one who committed the murder not him. The lawyer for Brady asked the prosecution to see all Boblit’s statements to get ready for trial but the prosecution withheld one statement in which Boblit admitted to committing the murder. Brady was found guilty by a jury of murder and was given a death sentence.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lindbergh Baby Case Essay

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Trial The trail in Flemington, New Jersey for the Lindbergh case against Hauptman lasted only five weeks. The evidence was circumstantial – based on the match of the marks on the ladder to Hauptman’s tools, wood in the ladder matched the wood of flooring in his attic, handwriting from the ransom notes matched Hauptman handwriting.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Lindbergh Kidnapping was one of the biggest crimes of the 20th century. Charles Lindbergh was best known for being the first man to fly solo across the Atlantic Ocean and make no stops. He was also a military explorer, author, inventor, and social activist. On March 1st, 1932, his son, Charles Augustus Lindbergh, Jr., was abducted from his home in New Jersey.…

    • 118 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a homicide investigation, there are many factors which may impact the likelihood of a successful case. In order for a suspect to be convicted on trial, investigative processes must be followed that involve several imperative elements. However, sometimes these procedures aren’t followed and it is in these circumstances that major errors and flaws in the inquiry process are exhibited. It is then due to this that recommendations and frameworks must be created in order to avoid such weaknesses in future cases. Although, sometimes extrinsic factors, such as the influence of the media, may also impact the outcomes of such cases.…

    • 1989 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The investigation provides police with a great opportunity to collect any attainable evidence and reconstruct a timeline and reenactment of the crime (Hartzell, n.d). The criminal court process is created to provide justice and protection for each member…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays