Unpopularity Of Tsarism In 1905

Improved Essays
There are many reasons for the growing unpopularity of Tsarism by 1905, some more important than others. These include necessary factors, such as the Bloody Sunday Massacre. Conditional factors, such as the dictatorship and the Russo-Japanese war. And Contingent factors, which include the beliefs and attitudes of the Tsar and the declining standards of living of the peasant population.

The beliefs, attitudes and personality of the Tsar himself was a major factor contributing to his unpopularity. He had a limited understanding of the poverty within Russia which meant that he didn’t make the reforms needed and decreased his popularity with the peasant population, which made up 80% of the Russian population. He also relied heavily on advisors
…show more content…
Nicholas refused the establishment of an elected, democratic parliament until this was forced upon him as a result of the 1905 revolution. Moreover, the Tsar had his own secret police otherwise known as the Okhrana who often used arbitrary arrest, detention and torture to gain information and this would have made the Tsar unpopular with ordinary Germans. The cossacks also forcefully suppressed strikes and protests adding to this and the Tsar himself encouraged pogroms against the Jews and supported the Black Hundreds. This is a conditional, political factor contributing to the unpopularity of tsarism.

The Tsarina often encouraged Nicholas to stay at home with his family rather than attending important meetings with his advisors or public events. This adds to his ineffectiveness as a leader. Moreover, the Tsarina was German and was therefore disliked by many of the Russian people. This is a political, contingent factor contributing to the Tsar’s
…show more content…
This was a disastrous decision as Russia suffered a humiliating defeat as they hadn’t sufficiently prepared for the war and underestimated the Japanese seeing them as an ‘inferior nation’. They were able to out-maneuver Russia and the humiliating defeat of the Russo-Japanese war highlighted the incompetence of the government and the Tsar himself. This is a conditional, political cause for the unpopularity of Tsarism by 1905.

Overall, the unpopularity of Tsarism by 1905 can be explained mostly by the Tsar’s decisions and actions, such as the Russo-Japanese war and the trigger of Bloody Sunday and also the nature of his autocratic regime. It can also be explained by smaller factors that contributed to the public discontent at the time such as the Tsarina and the conditions of the workers and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    That is why Nicholas and his family were killed and that's why Bolsheviks overthrew him. Nicholas the second was executed on July 6, 1918 with his wife and and children. He was the last Tsar of Russia under the Romanov rule. He was known as “Bloody Nicholas” because of the way he handled Bloody Sunday. His role in World War 1 and Bloody Sunday led to his…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Russia had been lagging behind the rest of Europe when it came to industry and modernity, but they were toward the beginning of the revolutionary movement. When World War I came about, Russians believed the war would be a short one and that they would not need to make use of all of their resources, such as soldiers and supplies. Tsar Nicholas put his faith into a Russian victory for the sake of national unity (EUROPE 165). Against Nicholas’s original beliefs, the war raged on, and peasants in Russia experienced even more unrest. Intellectuals became revolutionaries, and a regime was desired that “would let Russia catch up to the west” (SOURCES 84).…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He told Nicholas that the country was on the verge of revolution so potentially devastating. Nicholas had two choices, crush the rebellion or give the people civil rights, freedom of speech, and press, Nicholas recoiled at the idea of these democratic reforms. "The heart of the tsar is in the hand of God" Nicholas told his ministers any change would weaken the sacred, mortal power bestowed upon him by the Almighty. "I act in this spirit only because I am certain that it is necessary for Russia". Due to this Nicholas he thought it wasn't wretched that living conditions that had lead to the country's problems, it was the people that had turned against the autocracy and their holy tsar.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His authority and care for the Russians was meant to be like the care of a father in a family but Nicholas fails to show this. This was especially demonstrated during Bloody Sunday in 1905. The day first began with an Okhrana double agent. He was leading a group of workers who were demanding for better working conditions and they went to the winter palace where the Tsar went. Once they arrived, instead of NIcholas to listen to what they were saying, he deployed troops to shoot them which resulted in several causalities.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Nicholas Romanov Failure

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages

    He did not listen to his people and was frequently blind to their liberal ideas in his struggle to maintain a conservative and outdated way of life. He even resisted the Duma and their constitutional rule (Sokolsky). Nicholas was a fervent nationalist and had an immense love and pride for his country. This trait was not necessarily outdated because many other nations shared the same nationalistic drive. Imperialism is proof of that.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Zimmerman demonstrates Nicholas’s horrible leadership abilities through the tremendous amount of casualties felt by the Russian public and while Nicholas lost many battles. Many citizens blamed the tsar for…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II was ineffective in his…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ivan The Terrible Essay

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Another one of these was in population. His murderous plots and policies weakened and declined the population incredibly, causing the army to be affected as well. Because of the falling population, Russia's military could not bring in enough soldiers to sustain order ("What Was the Impact of Ivan the Terrible on Russia?”). As a part of Ivan's vicious policies, peasants were slammed with taxes of astronomical amounts, as well as serious threats of violence. These undesirable effects caused the peasants to flee, which decreased the population of Ivan's empire also ("Russia Ivan IV”).…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Which did not help him with the people. After the big horrible Russo-Japanese war there was an even bigger Revolution, and this was the Russian Revolution of 1905. The Russian Revolution was a changing point for all history. It is a story of changing powers in the modern days. This revolution end after Nicholas approved a representative assembly the Duma and promised constitution forms.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The history of Russia has gone through numerous drastic phases, with the transition from an autocracy to communism, and a communist regime to a relatively democratic state, just to name a few. The tragedy that befell the last ruling Romanov family has long been blamed on the Bolsheviks, with just cause, but the demise of the Romanovs began many years prior to the Bolshevik emergence. Historical writings have shown us that interpretations and biases can overtake the writing. It causes monumental differences in how events were perceived. Over the course of the last century, much research has gone into the final years of the ruling family reign and the contributing factors to their assassination, some of which was not available for decades.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Politically changes in attitudes threatened the autocratic rule of Tsar, many had heard of democracy and civil liberties from their appearances in Western Europe, thus leading to the formation of several political parties with various anti-autocratic ideologies, including the Socialist Democratic Party (of which a faction later become the Bolsheviks (Source B). The Bolsheviks in particular played a big role in the revolution and Russia society in the early 20th century, with ideology rooted in socialism and the belief that revolution was the only way to overthrow the tsarist rule, the Bolsheviks spent much of the years prior to the Tsars abdication working to undermine his rule. It is these changes which many historians attribute to reasons for the fall of the dynasty, suggesting that Russian political attitudes were no longer compatible with an autocratic political…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peasants made up 80% of the Russian population at the time and although they manly were loyal followers of the Tsar, many supported the Social Revolutionaries as there was a large discontent over land as most of the land was owned by the aristocracy (who made up only 1.5% of the population) and the church. This strained relationship between the Tsar and his people was shown when in 1903 rules on censorship and repressive measures were relaxed, which lead to ‘an explosion of anti-government pamphlets, books and newspapers’ 8 this shows that many people were unhappy with the way the Tsar ruled. An example of the people protesting against the way the Tsar ruled was on Sunday, 22 January 1905, also known as Bloody Sunday. On this day 200,000 protesters who were mainly workers, led by the priest Father Gapon marched to the Winter Palace in St. Petersburg with a petition for the Tsar, all carrying pictures of the Tsar to show respect.…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rasputin

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Reign of Terror: Rasputin Style How people shun others in society has changed over the years and yet stayed the same as well. We don’t force people to stand on a platform for three hours like Hester had to in The Scarlet Letter. In truth, what we do nowadays is much worse. The media acts like a watchdog and has the eyes of a hawk. Anyone who steps out of line, especially if that someone is famous, is forced to endure having their name become notorious literally?…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After Nicholas didn’t follow through with the October Manifesto which promised to give the parliament more power, it gave the public more reason to distrust him. Nicholas belief in upholding the autocracy, can be seen as a factor which led to the downfall of the Romanov…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was in this climate that the revolution broke out in the Russian capital and then spread throughout the country. Kerensky 's government lasted a few months , then became unpopular because of having tried to continue the war against the Germans and because they had made no economic reform favorable to the…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays