Truthfulness In Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics

Improved Essays
In Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle defines truthfulness as a person who represents themselves accurately. He defines truthfulness as a mean between two opposite extremes. The first extreme is what Aristotle calls a “boaster”. A boaster is somebody who presents themselves as better than they really are, even when they know they aren’t. He claims to have skills he lacks and lies about how developed said skills are. The other extreme is what he calls an ironist. An ironist is a person who downplays what skills or good qualities he or she does have. For someone to be truthful they have to be honest about what good and bad qualities they have. They also have to recognize the magnitude and limits of their skills. An example of a boaster

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Caroline Machado Ethical Dimensions 31/8/2015 Ancient Greece: Socrates and Plato Socrates was a Greek philosopher born in Athens in the year 469 B.C who did not know how to read or write himself. So, all we know about him comes from Plato. Socrates was known as the wisest men in Athens, but he wanted to find someone as smart as him. He wanted to define the meaning of good, beauty and virtue.…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Aristotle decided to take on the subject of the good in his Nicomachean Ethics. Aristotle argues that every person must make a choice to act good. Within his ideas of the good it is imperative that men take responsibility for their own actions and that they understand what their own intentions are doing in relation to the good. However, there are some oppositions that believe this is not the case. They would argue that men have no control over how something appears to them or how they perceive it, and that for every man the final end/good/happiness looks differently.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This essay will explain what the function argument is and what role it plays in Aristotle’s ethics. This essay will then be explicating, how successful the functional argument is. On the former, this essay will consider why the function argument is not deemed as successful and why it is problematic. From this, the essay will come to conclusion that, the function argument is successful, even though it has certain flaws.…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Those who won't take measure of their own strength, for fear of antagonizing their own weakness. Those who don't like to make waves — or enemies. Those for whom freedom, honor, truth, and principles are only literature. Those who live small, mate small, die small. It's the reductionist approach to life: if you keep it small, you'll keep it under control.…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, the complexities of individuals and their character traits are developed within a sphere of human nature and moral virtue. To Aristotle, character virtues define an individual’s well being, characterize their dispositions to action, and are defined by reason’s judgement of phasic, ethical dilemmas. Aristotle’s theory argues for moral accountability not only in manifested action, but in an individual’s very psyche. As such, moral character virtue influences an individual’s entirety, influencing their emotions and actions and setting their path toward human betterment, or human telos. The path to virtue is fixed on that human betterment, the path of vice turned away.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle seems to agree with Descartes to an extent regarding sensation. While Descartes believes that we cannot trust our senses at all, Descartes is a firm believer instead that we should seek only that which is undeniably true. Thus, since our senses can lie to us we should not trust them. This is best exemplified by his seeking of ideas that are ““Trying to build something that is firm and lasting”” Aristotle on the other hand believes that we should trust our senses if we are to become virtuous people.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the many subjects that Aristotle tackles in The Nicomachean Ethics is the concept and practice of friendship. Aristotle himself sets three requirements for friendship, as well as three separate categories for friendship, the categories being, utility based, pleasure based, and virtues based. While Aristotle does state that a virtue based friendship is the strongest, one could also put forth the argument that friendship only exists for the benefits of utility that come from friendship, leading to the true conclusion that friendship for the sake of friendship does not exist. The assumption of the argument is that no one would seek out friendship without desiring any of the benefits derived from friendship, including companionship, the…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While analyzing the Tao-te-Ching, many major themes are apparent. From the inevitability of change to the importance of non-action, the Tao-te-Ching is truly full of life lessons that deserve extensive analysis; however, one of the most prevalent and recurring themes is balance and its importance. Throughout Cultural Perspectives, many authors have addressed this same theme. Siddhartha Gautama Buddha, Plato, and Saint Augustine have all discussed this important topic; however, Aristotle best complements and contrasts Lao Tzu’s Tao-te-Ching in his work Nichmachean Ethics. When comparing and contrasting these two texts, one can see that these two authors had very similar ideas on the concept of balance. When comparing the two texts’ thoughts…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle proposes in his well renowned work, Nicomachean Ethics, a way of life that is structured on the foundation of what is happiness for human beings. Nicomachean Ethics provides the means in which are best determined to achieve the ultimate goal of an individual’s life which according to Aristotle is happiness. The definition of happiness is determined differently based on an individual’s perspective of the concept which the philosopher states in the beginning of Chapter Four in Book One of Nicomachean Ethics. Although differing in opinions and perspective of what happiness can best be defined as, there is a formal agreement of understanding amongst the people which Aristotle labels “the many and the refined” (Aristotle, Bartlett, & Collins,…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people have a lot of people that they are close to and consider them friends. Many of these friends to Aristotle are not real or at least do not have good intensions they just benefit from the friendship and this happens both way in the friendship. In “The Nicomachean Ethics” by Aristotle explains three types of friendships that occurring to him exist. He also says what type of people should be friend based on the category that they go in to.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle in the book Nicomachean tries to explore to find what is the supreme good for humans, meaning that humans have a purpose in life, but what is the best way to pursue our purpose and give our life meaning? This is answered through the perception of Aristotle of looking at its end, and goal. For instance, a car’s purpose is to take us to places in much faster time, or a bed’s purpose is to provide a comfortable property that improves humans sleep. Both of these is being understood by seeing what a car or a bed is. However, if someone performs this for some time, it well then be understood that some goals are lower than other goals, which those goals are also considered lower to other goals.…

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lying and being deceitful has been a theme in many works of literature and one thing that readers can take away from most of these works, is that the end result will not be good. Not being honest…

    • 2211 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle expands on what are the requirements for people to be considered good, or virtuous. He explains how political science is the ultimate science, since it deals not only with individual good, but with a societal good, which involves leadership in the most significant manner. For him, being virtuous is a necessary component of good life, which is one that is lived well, and may be perceived as “happy.” For practical purposes, however, in a world where one must interact with others, it is difficult to reach a consensus on the patterns of behavior that can be seen as virtuous. Nonetheless, Aristotle provides a most thorough structure to living virtuously, which he opens to be molded to the circumstances and…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is possible that at times the truth is contradicted for the benefit of the public which is better and correct, like at the time of the Nazi occupation of Europe when storm troopers were misinformed about family whereabouts. This was seen as a heroic deceit. Consequently as part of human development, we can perceive and understand that there may not be a complete need for truthfulness in our forms of conveyance amongst one another during our daily experiences. Lying and deceiving one may not always be seen as a bad or dishonorable in many conditions because we assume politicians lie, and thus for the politics to work we need to believe in them. The writer Damon makes an assortment of different expressions focusing on historical and cultural viewpoints discussing modern issues regarding the lack of honestly and truthfulness.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the the first book of the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle seeks to find the highest good of all human beings. In the process of deciding that the highest good is happiness, Aristotle ends up discarding certain entities, such as pleasure and honor, of being candidates for the highest good. In Aristotle’s discussion of the goods we seek, he rather quickly disregards pleasure as a possible highest good. In Bk. 1.…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays