The Concept And Practice Of Friendship In Aristotle's The Nicomachean Ethics

Improved Essays
One of the many subjects that Aristotle tackles in The Nicomachean Ethics is the concept and practice of friendship. Aristotle himself sets three requirements for friendship, as well as three separate categories for friendship, the categories being, utility based, pleasure based, and virtues based. While Aristotle does state that a virtue based friendship is the strongest, one could also put forth the argument that friendship only exists for the benefits of utility that come from friendship, leading to the true conclusion that friendship for the sake of friendship does not exist. The assumption of the argument is that no one would seek out friendship without desiring any of the benefits derived from friendship, including companionship, the …show more content…
The difference made between utility and pleasure is very narrow. With utility we our affection for one another is based on the benefits they give us, the services they provide for us, while affection based on pleasure is rooted in what is agreeable to us, in Book Eight of his ethics, he uses the example of witty people, that we enjoy their company not based on the fact we enjoy them as a person, but their wit is agreeable to us. One can ascertain just how similar the base ideas of these two concepts are; going as far to frame the argument that pleasure itself should be classified as a utility, we use these people to entertain ourselves, making pleasure just a result of utility, not an entirely different category. He does provide a clearer distinction between these and virtue, the friendship he describes as working …show more content…
Theoretically, these are the friendships that last eternally, where both people wish well for one another for their own sake. This is the main distinction between this category and the ones of utility and pleasure; with the previous two, you are friends with them for your own sake, you’re friends in exchange for the benefits that come along with the friendship. Here, we observe a friendship that is perfect where both parties have friendship for the sake of friendship. Now, Aristotle does admit that these friendships are rare, due to good men being rare. Consequently, one may argue that these men do not exist. Perhaps in a perfect world with perfect people this friendship could exist, where each person truly cares for that person based not on what they are receiving from the person but for the sake of the person and their friendship. Ours is not a perfect world, and the people are far from

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Nisccomachean Ethics Book VII, Aristotle argues that there are three types of friendships; that being, utility, pleasure and goodness. Goodness, encompasses both utility and pleasure and only exists when both people involved admire each other’s goodness over a long period of time; this sort of friendship is very rare. According to Aristotle friendship is either “a virtue or implies virtue,” if there is something loveable in a person, “for not everything seems to be loved but only the lovable and this is good, pleasant or useful.” The idea of a perfect friendship relies on an equal exchange of with utility, pleasure, or goodness to sustain equality and love between the two people. However, in some cases, where the power structure between the two is unequal then the love on either side must be proportional to the others worth to reestablish equality of love.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Virtue is the habit of choosing the mean between the extremes of excess and deficiency with regard to some action or emotion. Most importantly, virtue brings upon friendship since virtue is the parent and preserver of friendship and without virtue, friendship cannot exist at all. Aristotle’s aristotelian view on friendship in the Nicomachean Ethics Books 8 & 9 contrasts and compares with Cicero’s eclectic view on friendship in De Amicitia in numerous ways. Aristotle defines friendship as two people wishing for the goodwill of the other with them both being aware of it. In fact, Cicero studied Aristotle and wrote his own dialogue on friendship.…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, both friendship and justice are present in communal associations. In the community, there are three types of friendship, with the highest form being a perfect friendship. Friends are crucial for humans to flourish, but perfect friendships are rare as Aristotle describes it as a “Friendship of men who are good, and alike in virtue; for these wish well alike to each other… and they are good in themselves.” (Nic.8.3.1156b7-9). A perfect friendship encourages both people in the relationship to better themselves and push each other towards a higher standard.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most individuals can intuitively understand the concept of a friend or being in a friendship, however few can claim to have exhausted the topic to the extent Aristotle has in his Nicomachean Ethics. In his work, Aristotle attempts to outline what steps a person has to take in order to live a good and prosperous life. One topic that is pivotal in this discussion are the fundamentals of friendship. In order to demonstrate the significance, the various types of friendships, the the individuals that exist within each, and the difference between each of the types is outlined. Aristotle’s examination of friendships demonstrates the necessity in acquiring friends in order to achieve the good life.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Aristotle addresses the topic of friendship in Book 8 and 9 of his Nicomachean Ethics. Aristotle makes the argument that friends can be regarded as second selves. Aristotle says that just as virtuous behavior improves an individual, friends have the potential to generate improvements upon each other's lives. The main gist of Aristotle's argument is on the relationship between friendship and justice (102). He asserts that if people stay friends, they do not have any need for justice, but if they maintain justice, they also need friendship in addition.…

    • 110 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle argued that true friendship can be achieved when people spend time together and live together. Nevertheless, Beth was spending less time with Tony, making him feel lonely. Aristotle said, “Those, however, who approve of each other but do not live together seem to be well-disposed rather than actual friends. For there is nothing so characteristic of friends as living together (since while it people who are in need that desire benefits, even those who are supremely happy desire to spend their days together; for solitude suits such people least of all);” Aristotle argued that even though two people are friends, if they do not spend time together, their friendship weakens because no one likes being…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The other two types of friendship are aimed at pleasure, or utility. However, these types of friendship are not lasting, because they are created for the sake of obtaining a good generated from their peers. Insofar the individuals involved generate pleasure, or provide utility to the agent. Once that pleasure/utility has ceased, Aristotle expresses the friendship will also dissolve since the advantageous goods generated have stopped (122). He does propose that a friendship based on pleasure resembles the virtuous friendship, because the individuals in these relationships aim to be pleasant to each other (126, section 4).…

    • 1816 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although a friendship can be derived strictly off pleasure, it is not likely to be in complete harmony with happiness. This is due to pleasure consistently changing and once that pleasure changes,…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Familial Love: the Path of Least Rejection In this paper, I will argue that familial love is the most pure and true by an evaluation Aristotle’s views on friendship and love. Everyone has a different view on love and most generally believe in a multitude of shades of love. Aristotle does as well. Although he believes in three distinct types of friendship.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Aristotle argues that friendship is integral to a fulfilling life because “without friends no one would choose to live, though he had all other goods” (Aristotle). He then introduces the assumption that “one might like someone because he is good, or because he is useful, or because he is pleasant” (Stanford). Aristotle describes three friendships based on which of these qualities draws the individuals together. There are friends of utility or for “what is good for themselves”, friends of pleasure or for “the sake of what is pleasant to themselves”, and friends of the good. These friends of the good are described as “perfect friendship” between individuals who are “good and alike in virtue” (Aristotle).…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Friendship is an integral part of who we are as human beings, and ancient Greek philosophers attempted to understand why we need or want friendships. The basic ideas we have of friendship are based on the ideas that have been implemented by philosophers like Plato and Aristotle. However, some of these same ideas have been misinterpreted into modern culture. Even the ideas Plato and Aristotle discussed were not fulling practiced in truth. This essay will discuss the idea of friendship according to both Plato and Aristotle focusing on friendships impact on the Psyche, discussing the similarities and differences between the two philosophers, and how these have affected modern society’s idea of friendship.…

    • 2018 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moreover, Aristotle’s use of division actually allows the reader to see the similarities between the two ideas, justice and friendship. Both are defined by smaller, more refined categories, which are organized hierarchically themselves, many of these individual categories mirroring one another. This mirroring is particularly evident in the transactional and reciprocal nature of friendship: “[i]n all friendships between dissimilars it is, as we have said, proportion that equalizes the parties and preserves the friendship” (Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, 1163b). Aristotle is concerned with balance in the nature of friendship, suggesting that the amount given and received in a friendship must be exchanged both proportionally and reciprocally. He suggests that friendships last “when the love is in proportion to the merit of the parties”, meaning that in a relationship of people who are unequal, the person who is most worthy should be loved the most (Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, 1158b).…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The first is for mutual pleasure, though it does indeed consider the good of the other person in addition to one 's own sense of enjoyment (“it is only those in whom [loving] is found...that are lasting friends,” viii-ix). Personal advantage can also be said to consider to some extent the well-being of the other individual, though it clearly orients around understanding, reflection upon, and pursuit of gain and leverage outside the friendship itself—accruing to one party (“He must return as much as he has received, or even more…,”) viii-ix). Friendship for 'the good, ' reflects the highest ideal in this area—friendship between two virtuous people for altruistic ends that uphold the best of these individuals and the moral underpinnings of society (“In friendships based on virtue...complaints do not arise,” viii); both are concerned for each other 's good for each other 's sake and for the essential character of each (viii-ix). I would suggest that, in my own case, this was a friendship oriented around the good. There was mutual concern and pleasure, to be sure, but also a desire to uphold broad societal principles, manners, and mores (i.e. respect for authority, order, confidentiality, health and wellness, compassion, etc.).…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle wrote his ethical theory Nicomachean Ethics in 340 BC. Nicomachean ethics is centered around happiness. He believes that a good life is one that consists of virtues – both moral, such as courage, and intellectual, such as science – which leads to eudemonia, or happiness. In Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle designs an outline of a good life, and uses this outline to shape the common good. A good life, is one of virtue and happiness.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Aristotle in his The Nicomachean Ethics, there are several different types of friendships, each with their own qualities, motives, and products. Aristotle defines the different types of friendships into three categories: friendships of utility, friendships of pleasure, and friendships of the good. Within each of these particular groupings of friendship, the interpersonal relationships associated bring forth positive effects to both an individual and a community. Friendship is not only necessary to lead a virtuous life but also to sustain a successfully functioning community though its effects in bettering an individual, others, and, consequently, the society as a whole.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays