Thomas Hobbe's Argument Analysis

Improved Essays
Everyone has hopes and dreams for a better future. We all want to live a happy life, where we are surrounded by our loved ones and can work to make our dreams a reality. However, what are we willing to do to accomplish our goals? Will we kill those who are blocking our path, will we cheat, will we extortionate others? The truth is, we will. People are willing and are capable of doing the less things when we want something. Everything we do, we ultimately do for our own benefit.
Hobbes possesed this cynical view on humans because he believed humans were selfish and could not be trusted. His argument is logical and convincing not only by the evidence that he provides, but also because it is what we see in society today. The good may outweigh
…show more content…
Equality is generally a good thing; however, in a world inhabited with an immense population and low resources, one wonders how these resources can be distributed equally among everyone. The reality of the situation is that they can't. Hobbes comes to the conclusion that equality leads to competition among humans. If two people are equal in every aspect and both want a piece of cherry pie, but there is only one piece, how do we determine who gets the piece? People need to compete with each other in order to survive. This concept is known as “survival of the fittest” and it can be seen in every aspect of society. It is our very nature to want to live, regardless of how we ensure that we do so. When trying to survive, we don't think of anyone else besides ourselves. We may think of our loved ones when we do certain things; however our loved ones revolve around us, so technically we’re doing it for us. We can become ruthless when it comes to what we

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    During the sixteenth century there was a rise with Absolutism throughout the European monarch. Absolutism is the acceptance of or belief in absolute principles in political, philosophical, ethical, or theological matters. Two theorist, Thomas Hobbes and Jacques Benigne Bossuet, wrote books and articles to justify the points and needs of an absolute rule, although Absolutism has it benefits it’s not necessarily the best way of ruling one’s country. An example of an unsuccessful absolute ruler was Ivan the Terrible. Even with justification from two theorist Ivan the Terrible was not a good ruler or king.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The nature of man according to Hobbes in chapter 13 of Leviathan is that men always desire power and will never be satisfied with the amount of power that they have, because of this men will always try to gain more power. This power hungry mindset causes men to be in a constant state of competition and war. Men will continue to fight for power. Without rules and a common leader men will become so power hungry that they will destroy themselves and others. William Golding fulfills Hobbes ideas about man with Lord of the Flies in the moments when, Jack and Ralph are fighting for power, when Simon dies and when Piggy dies.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine living in a world where everything you know is different. In today’s age we are born selfish. It is the survival instinct we still have. Whenever we're hungry, angry, or disappointed, we show our selfishness. In this world that is all gone and all we know is doing what is best for everyone else.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes states that “in order to live a more contented life… men must give up their freedom to the State” (Document 2). He believed that people were naturally cruel and needed protection from themselves. Hobbes wanted rule by absolute monarchs. He thought it was the only way to keep people in check. His beliefs closely supported how many people thought back then.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is from this idea that Hobbes argues that the fear of death and bodily harm usher man to seek collective peace. The anarchy of the state of nature is consistent with the continual emotion of fear, fear that someone will steal your property or perhaps enslavement. To relieve this tension and enjoy life with less worry, Hobbes claims that people create a social contract between them and a ruler. According to him, people would essentially give up their power to one ruler who in turn, the ruler would ensure they could live peacefully. The only right left to the people, after they give all their power to a ruler and agree to abide by those laws, is the right to not be killed.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hobbes thinks that man is not strong enough to be ruled by themselves but need a more powerful person. Napoleon Bonaparte was an example of a man more powerful than the rest he got into power throughout people of France likening him a lot. After that he slowly took control and keep giving himself…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Locke states that “...equality [is] wherein all the power and jurisdiction is reciprocal, no one having more than another; there being nothing more evident, than that the creatures of the same species and rank, promiscuously born to all the same advantages of nature, and the use of the same faculties, should also be equal one amongst another without subordination or subjection” (Locke). His statement express the converse of Hobbes’ argument, and says that humans are equal with equal rights and opportunities. Although Locke’s argument is valid, Hobbes’ idea makes more sense as his thought process encompasses every individual. Not one individual can be completely selfless, but at the same time, not one individual can be completely selfish. There has to be a balance between the two philosophies, and incorporating both ideas into one philosophy seems best, but either way, Hobbes’ argument is more correct and accurate than Locke’s.…

    • 1616 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, many different countries have had many different governments. Cicero describes several basic forms of political governments such as kingdoms, aristocracy, and democracies. However, Cicero believed that was another kind of government that could could mix all of these ideas together to make a better government, this was called a commonwealth. Thomas Hobbes also talked about a commonwealth, but his ideas were different from Cicero’s. Some have even stated that the United States is not a democratic commonwealth, which seems to be true.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Laura Hart Mr. Fornshell & Ms. McClure Humanities 150 February 2017 Who has the power? In Charles Johnson’s, Middle Passage, the difference between Hobbes’ and Locke’s views of government are well illustrated in the story. Hobbes’ belief that an absolute monarch is the best way to maintain a peaceful society is very similar to what Falcon believes about the leadership of the Republic.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes’ belief in the inherent selfishness of human begins who desire power can clearly be seen when Jack kills his first pig and the boys miss the chance of being rescued. In his most famous work, Leviathan, Thomas Hobbes articulates his view on the selfish nature of humans when he writes, “For such is the nature of man, that howsoever they may acknowledge many others to be more witty, or more eloquent, or more learned; Yet they will hardly believe there be many so wise as themselves: For they see their own wit at hand, and other mens at a distance”(Hobbes). Hobbes uses parallel structure to articulate the idea that an individual believes themselves better than all others in a society.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lastly, Hobbes and Augustine are very similar with they describe men as beast because they have desire and as well they have free will and reason helps them to get out of things which is wrong, but according to Aristotle, he believes that the nature of man and how they become evil is with their body and their soul. Aristotle he also had desire he wanted to sink his teeth into making him one of the utmost key figures in philosophy. Aristotle goes through those types that man has gone through evil. According to Aristotle “that man by nature is blind to morality suggesting that man is naturally a creature, this backed up by his earlier works that man is born without knowledge. Then morality cannot be part of human nature as man has yet to acquire…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Further, Hobbes states that prior to society morals do not exist. Humans in their state of nature are unable to make a moral distinction between good and evil. Good is simply what they desire, and evil is what they want to…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    CONTRACTARIANISM INTRODUCTION “Any of the various theories that justify moral principles and political choices because they depend on a social contract involving certain ideal conditions. A general ethical theory, that individuals make the right choices under a hypothetical social contract.” (www.dictionary.com) “Contractarianism, which stems from the Hobbesian line of social contract thought, holds that persons are primarily self-interested, and that a rational assessment of the best strategy for attaining the maximization of their self-interest will lead them to act morally (where the moral norms are determined by the maximization of joint interest) and to consent to governmental authority. Contractualism, which stems from the Kantian…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Hobbes

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hobbes’ maintains humans have a “natural condition,” which may be either blissful or brutish. Given such condition, Hobbes asks, how members of society to act/ought to be. Intuitively many philosophers agree members of a society existing blissfully is not only preferred, but better. And, if we grant what is better for society captures that which is good for a society, then individuals ought to act according to the promotion of this peaceful societal end. One objection to Hobbes comes from whether an individual has the right to opt-out of the contract.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hobbes cared about maximizing liberty, defining social justice, and knowing how to divide the limits of the government power. The process of the state of nature is formed by a community and a government. People would view him as a “Psychological egoist” he was over the top with an unrealistic view of human nature. In the laws of nature and the social contract, “Hobbes thinks the state of nature is something we ought to avoid, at any cost except our own self presentation” (Thomas Hobbes). Hobbes believed in a social contract and how it would help the government rule the society.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays