Thomas Hobbes The Citizens Analysis

Improved Essays
Thomas Hobbes, a political philosopher who established the social contract theory and became a foundation in Western political philosophy. When presented this claim: "The more equal people are, the easier it is for them to live in peace. If people were perfectly equal, there would be no more wars.", Hobbes response to this assertion would have been rejection, according to his book; The Citizens. He would be at this conclusion because he does not think humans should live in equality. He believes that humans should strive for peace above all things but war is nessesary when lives are threatened. Hobbes does claim that humans in the state of nature are all equals.
The state of nature is what Hobbes decribes as a place without any government and caotic. Naturally men exist in a state of equality, where everyone is for themselves. Hobbes believed that men are equal as a whole but not as individuals. Not in nature but in society, men are contained by laws of the government. Does not matter of physical or mental ability, everyone has an equal opportunity to succeed, which is Hobbes’ view of equality of men. Men cannot possibly have equal power in society, “…if all men have it, no man hath it, for theyconsist in comparison and excellence; neither doth the society of others advance any whit
…show more content…
Wherefore to seek peace, where there is any hopes of obtaining it, and where there is none, to enquire out for auxiliaries of war, is the dictate of right reason; that is, the law of nature,.” [CITIZEN] Power cannot be distributed evenly because then we would not have a society, only in nature people are equal. Though that peace should always be welcomed, Hobbes do state that war is necessary when to defend and

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Thomas Hobbes established his own ideas about people and politics. For example, Hobbes believed that humans were selfish and did anything to better their position. Also, he believed that nations were selfishly motivated and only battled for power and wealth…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Meng Tzu Case Study

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In that state of nature we respond to others in three different ways. First, competition, which is what we invade to take what another has for ourselves. Second, diffidence, which is when we fear another and have a desire for safety in order to retain what we already have. Lastly, the strife for glory, which is when we worry about appearing significant in another’s eyes. A society with laws and moral codes can be instituted from a state of nature because Hobbes believed a society is formed is due to fear and the desire for security.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Hobbes, man’s life in the state of nature was one of fear and selfishness. He believes man natural liberty must be limited because, “all mankind [has] a perpetuall and restlesse desire of Power after power, that ceaseth onely in Death”. Under Hobbes philosophies, a social contract focuses man to surrender all their rights and freedoms to an authority. This authority will then protect the lives and properties of the people. The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen establishes Hobbes often discussed “natural rights of man [which] are the sole causes of the miseries of the world”.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chapter 22: Enlightenment and Revolution Assessment –Research Worksheet Directions: Completion of this worksheet is a required part of your assessment for this unit. Please type into this document and email it to your teacher in the same email as the Facebook profile. Thomas Hobbes Where was he born? Thomas Hobbes was born in Westport, in 5th April 1588.…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    9/11 Policy Changes

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hobbes believed that with social contract anyone can have anything such as taking someone’s life or taking away someone’s property which can cause conflict and war. Hobbes claimed that if you cannot have peace then you have to practice for war. According to Hobbes, “From this fundamental law of Nature, by which men are commanded to endeavour peace, is derived this second law, “that a man be willing, when others are so too, as far-forth, as for peace, and defence of himself he shall think it necessary…””. In…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Locke states that “...equality [is] wherein all the power and jurisdiction is reciprocal, no one having more than another; there being nothing more evident, than that the creatures of the same species and rank, promiscuously born to all the same advantages of nature, and the use of the same faculties, should also be equal one amongst another without subordination or subjection” (Locke). His statement express the converse of Hobbes’ argument, and says that humans are equal with equal rights and opportunities. Although Locke’s argument is valid, Hobbes’ idea makes more sense as his thought process encompasses every individual. Not one individual can be completely selfless, but at the same time, not one individual can be completely selfish. There has to be a balance between the two philosophies, and incorporating both ideas into one philosophy seems best, but either way, Hobbes’ argument is more correct and accurate than Locke’s.…

    • 1616 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes arrived at the idea that all people were created equal because he felt that in a natural world without government that everyone was created equal. He also believed that this was part of the problem – the reason that people chose to rebel and combat each other to fulfill their interests because that meant that no person could rise above…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hobbes would agree with this idea. He believed that people should give up their rights to the central power in return for protection. Every day, in some form, people give up their individual rights and self-interest for the common good. This is why people wait in line for their turn at the coffee shop, understand when others with greater needs go before them in the emergency room even though they arrived first, and evacuate a building when there is an alarm. In these circumstances, people have their own interests and desires, but are willing to set them aside for the good of those around them.…

    • 1121 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    To Hobbes, it did not matter what realm man was in – public or private, man would be living in solitude. Also, in stark contrast to Aristotle, Hobbes believed that being a human did not necessitate participating in politics since everyone was born equal. Whereas Aristotle was more concerned with people finding ways to contribute to the greater good and realizing their “duties”, someone following a Hobbesian way of life would wonder what they could get from the state, instead of what they could give to…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    PS4217F Major Political Thinkers: Hobbes Assignment 1: What are the main strengths and weaknesses of Hobbes’ theory of civil order? Name: Denise Cher Yan Wen Matriculation Number: A0127001A Word Count: 1887 Introduction Hobbes’ theory of civil order is based on the fundamental law of nature, which is to seek peace (Hobbes 2012, 200). According to Hobbes, to seek peace is necessarily to seek peace in the condition of war, and justice is therefore a legal compliance with the terms of the social contract (Hobbes 2012, 220).…

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Karl Marx were three opposing philosophers during the Enlightenment with their own interpretations on government and people. Hobbes believed society needed an absolute monarchy, “to confer all their power and strength upon one man.” Locke said that human nature had natural rights, and were therefore “not to be under the will or legislative authority of man.” Finally, Marx believed in communism, in which belongings are public. All of the philosophies had their own relation to the social contract, which was introduced by Jean Jacques Rousseau.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes, on the other hand, thinks that people only care about power and appetite. We want certain things and we want to get power to get those things. Hobbes’ view is that there is no such thing as responsibility. Moreover, we look at the state of nature. Locke stated that the state of nature is the state of no government; law that obliges everyone and reason.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes states “To this war of every man against every man, this also is consequent; that nothing can be unjust. The notions of right and wrong, justice and injustice have there no place. Where there is no common power, there is no law: where no law, no injustice.” According to Hobbes the only way to leave this state of war is for everyone to consent to falling under the rule of one political ruler with absolute power otherwise known as the leviathan. Once the leviathan is in power, justice is what the leviathan says it is.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hobbes wants the society to work together meaning giving some rights up in exchange for protection. “This equality of ability produces equality of hope for the attaining of our goals” (Thomas Hobbes). For example, if two people want something they both can’t enjoy or use then they quickly become enemies. Hobbes view, “A law of nature is a command or general rule, discovered by reason, which forbids a man to do anything that is destructive of his life or takes away his means for preserving his life, and forbids him to omit anything by which he thinks his life can best be preserved” (Leviathan, Chapter 14). Those who debate this subject often mistake right and law to be the same yet they ought to be distinguished.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes reduces the state of nature to a list of laws based on the individual’s desire to seek peace, which would conflict with the scenario Hobbes presents. However, one could view the state of nature as an example of collective rationality prescribing individual rationality. In the end, peace may be the goal, but it can only be achieved if others are united in seeking this goal.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays