Analysis Of William James 'The Ethics Of Belief'

Improved Essays
In William James', “The Will to Believe, James provides a defensive response to religious faith regarding W. T. Clifford's position in his essay, "The Ethics of Belief" (James, 2001). Within his stance, James suggests that his views have a somewhat broader scope that Clifford’s (Princeton University, n.d.). Moreover, that in certain cases, it is not only permissible but inevitable that a person’s passional, non-rational nature will determine that person’s belief (Princeton University, n.d.).

In summary, James presents that anything that is proposed for our belief is a hypothesis and that any question about which of the two hypotheses to accept is a person’s option (Princeton University, n.d.). James provides his hypothesis presented
…show more content…
Within his abstract, James states that a person has the right to believe at his or her own risk, any hypotheses that are considered live enough to tempt our will (Corbett, 1980). James’ concrete manner added that a person’s freedom to believe can only cover living options, which ones intellect alone cannot resolve (Corbett, 1980). Furthermore, that living options never seem as absurdities to the person who has to consider them (Corbett, 1980). Overall, James finds that Clifford’s argument is unconvincing because Clifford is afraid of possible error created by using his (Clifford’s) own passion was permitted.

References: Burger, A. J. (2001). An Examination of ‘The Will to Believe’. Retrieved October 6, 2017, from http://ajburger.homestead.com/files/book.htm Corbett, B. (1980). The Will to Believe. William James. Retrieved from http://faculty.webster.edu/corbetre/philosophy/misc/james.html James, W. (2001). The Will to Believe. Retrieved October 2, 2017, from http://ajburger.homestead.com/files/book.htm#preface

Notes on James, "The Will to Believe". (n.d.). Retrieved October 06, 2017, from https://www4.uwsp.edu/philosophy/dwarren/IntroBook/CliffordJames/James/james%202.htm

Princeton University. (n.d.). The Will to Believe. Retrieved October 06, 2017, from

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In “Reasonable Religious Disagreements,” Richard Feldman posits that two reasonable peers cannot come to a reasonable disagreement. The premise of a “reasonable disagreement” has various conditions, in short being that the peers must be epistemic, and they must have shared all of their evidence pertaining to the argument. By this criteria, it is not plausible for two epistemic peers with access to the same body of evidence to ever reach reasonably different conclusions. However, a problem arises with the previously stated criteria when examining the point regarding full disclosure of evidence. When examining Feldman’s article from this perspective, it is possible that it may not be considered fully viable.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Clifford and James are two philosophers who have contradicting opinions on whether having sufficient evidence is always necessary to believe in something. Where Clifford believes you cannot believe in anything without sufficient evidence, James believes that if the evidence doesn’t point in one way or another, it is justified to believe something based on our will. I will be arguing that James’ side is indeed correct. In James’ paper, he provides concrete evidence as to why his opinion is correct.…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “We all know that there can be no proof for His existence. To believe in The Author requires us to take a step beyond reason, it requires faith. There can be no knowledge of The Author without faith.” King Gobius of Mavinor struggles to bring his kingdom closer to The Author, finding the truths within the ancient scrolls and is determined to seek peace with the neighboring kingdoms especially Xamnon and their king Antiugus –a kingdom that except for a few believe The Author is only for the weak and does not exist… DeFilippis writes a poignant and magical tale of fantasy and Christianity. Excitement abounds as plots arise against the king that must be stopped.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the reading of “the Ethics of Belief” by W.T Clifford, Clifford stated what we believe is not a private matter. Clifford explained that beliefs and ideas are handed down from one generation to another and that if one person has not done his best, the faulty beliefs can be ineffective and corrupt our system which we depend on. The comments are interesting and gives me the impression that Clifford was trying to say that beliefs are property of our society and do not belong to just one person. Clifford is just saying that these false beliefs can be harmful to people who believe without seeking evidence.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thus I lean more towards believing in Clifford’s rationalization that we should never fully believe something until we have sufficient evidence. The idea of Epistemology…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (p. 249). And thus, by believing that reality exists in the human mind, he also believe that a…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two philosophers by the name of William James – supporter of religious belief without sufficient evidence – and Richard Feldman – a supporter of Clifford’s Principle – argue their side in separate essays on what to think about beliefs. James denies that one must always use sufficient evidence and insist on using a set of rules called “hypotheses”. When all three hypotheses are used at once, then it leads to the final answer known as a “genuine” option. Feldman disagrees with James and uses Clifford’s Principle, which conveys that believing in something that was derived from insufficient evidence is always wrong, no matter what the case is. Both are philosophers with opposing ideas and stances upon the subject of belief, so who does one believe?…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the reading of “The Ethics of Belief,” Clifford used the story of the shipowner’s as an example to suppose his claim of credulous can lead one in harming society. In the story, the ship owner fail to believe or consider the advice from the other, which eventually leading the ship to sink and cost the life of the men on the ship. This story is a perfect example of explaining how a person’s ignorance belief could be danger and harmful to society. Clifford explains that even if the ship did not sink and the people did not die, not attempting in investigating would still prove the shipowner to be guilty and harmful to the society. According to Clifford, what makes a credulous man to be dangerous and irresponsible is the fact that although a…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In ‘The Subjectivity of Values’, J L Mackie examines error theory and objective morality vs non-cognitivism. Mackie’s report represents moral scepticism using moral error theory. By taking an error theory approach, Mackie confronts morality similarly to the manner in which an atheist confronts religion. Moral error theory could be broken down to a version of the Justified True Belief outline as follows: Moral claims are universally false There is reason to believe that moral claims are universally false There is no justification for believing any deniable claim…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Clifford takes a stab at practical justification for the relationship between evidence and belief in his essay “The Ethics of Belief”. Using an example of a ship-owner who knowingly sends out a ship that had faulty machinery, caused by poor care, which eventually lead to the ship sinking, Clifford drives home the point that it is always wrong, everywhere, and for anyone to believe anything on insufficient evidence. This is because with insufficient evidence, you run the risk of harming yourself or others. Responding to Clifford, William James wrote “The Will to Believe” in which he makes an argument that it is unlivable to work off of Clifford’s theoretical essay. He believes that life would be greatly impoverished if one did so.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Though the “Eternal Gift” pamphlet wrongfully depicts the purpose of faith, accurately depicts the basic principle that the only way to salvation is through impartial faith in Jesus. In the pamphlet, it that’s that “He will save you if you trust Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior,” which is biblically supported. In the Gospel of John, Jesus affirms the reality that “no one comes to the father except through [Jesus]” (John 14:6). The pamphlet illustrates this point further beyond just the basic concept that salvation is through faith in Jesus, but also impartial faith. The “Eternal Gift” argues this through repetition of absolute rhetoric such as “complete” and “only,” invoking the message that faith in Jesus ought to be impartial.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    What is a belief? According to the Merriam-Webster online dictionary, there exists three different definitions for belief: “something that is accepted, considered to be true, or held as an opinion : something believed”, “a state or habit of mind in which trust or confidence is placed in some person or thing” and “conviction of the truth of some statement or the reality of some being or phenomenon especially when based on examination of evidence”. While each of these definitions describe what a belief is (in a general way), this paper is going to focus on five different specific beliefs: strong, weak, true, false, and subjective beliefs. In addition, this paper will also acknowledge two peculiar kinds of knowledge, both personal and factual.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even before World War One, the desire to abolish the cycle of war was apparent in civilized society. This was made apparent by William James with his essay “The Moral Equivalent of War”. In his essay, James argues through anecdotes and multiple viewpoints that another method besides warfare should be used to advance civilization. James utilizes perspective throughout his essay to strengthen his argument through an ethos appeal. Throughout his work, he consistently acknowledges two parties: pacifists and advocates of war.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato's Apology Argument

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Every human being has the ability to decide what they believe and what they do not. At a very early age, we develop judgement that allows us to choose whether or not to accept certain claims. These assertions may be tempting, but our reasoning allows us to critically analyze the information with respect to all of our previous knowledge. These claims may be faith based, fact-based, or opinion. Without recognizing it, we take every bit of information we gather, analyze it, and decide whether we accept its validity.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Meme Concept Of Dawkins

    • 3197 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The Oxford English Dictionary defines the meme as an element of a Culture (taken here in the sense of civilization) can be regarded as transmitted by nongenetic means, especially through imitation. The term meme was first proposed by Richard Dawkins in The Selfish Gene and comes from an association between gene and mimesis. Dawkins also points to a close kinship with the French word same. Memes were presented by Dawkins as replicators, comparable in this respect to genes, but responsible for the evolution of certain animal behaviors and cultures. Dawkins's definition is a unit of information in a brain, exchangeable within a society.…

    • 3197 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Great Essays