The Effects Of Colonial Resistance To The Proclamation Movement

Great Essays
Colonial resistance to the "proclamation line" had been one of unifying factors that had committed many English colonists to revolution and helped spread an emerging nationalism. The exciting textbook American Nation, states that, "American independence and control of a wide and rich domain were the most obvious results of the Revolution." The revolution provided access to vast western lands and for many years western expansion would serve as an element that bound the various sections together. Yet as the decades rolled on and the United States added even more land in its march to the Pacific, expansionism led to sectionalism which resulted in the Union being torn apart.

It was an ice cold morning in late February and the wind
…show more content…
With the loss of his forces due to yellow fever he could no longer fathom holding any part of the new world against British attack. Forgoing his plans Napoleon offered all of Louisiana to Livingston, the American French ambassador. In April of 1803 a treaty was signed by Livingston and James Monroe for the purchase of Louisiana for 15 million dollars. With the introduction of new territories comes woe in congress with sectional issues on admission of slave states into the union. It would be decades before the actual question of the morality of slavery would be addressed and so comes a series of compromises. In the 1800’s Missouri want to be admitted into the union. The north did not want to lose the balance in the house of repersentives with the admission of more slave states due to the three-fifths Compromise, which stated that three- fifths of all slaves would be counted for representation in the house and for federal taxes of that state. With the northern border of Missouri stretching passed “the Ohio river, which they considered slavery’s natural boundaries,” (215) came the fear of competing with slave labor in the north and the spread of an institution that they deplored. So the Missouri Compromise was born. In exchange of Missouri being admitted to the union as a slave state, Maine entered as the Free State to maintain the balance in the senate. Also to alleviate other concerns …show more content…
Mexico was giving away free land to those that would settle it but with conditions that eventually caused Mexico headaches. They required new settlers to be of the catholic faith and in 1829 Mexico outlawed slavery. The indifference to Mexico’s conditions eventually lead to a rebellion and to the Mexican war. After the Mexican war the United States saw the opportunity to acquire parts of Mexico while the Mexican government was in turmoil. The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo established the boundary of Texas as the Rio Grande, and sold New Mexico and the upper part of California for 15 million dollars. With the recent acquisition of California came prosperity for the country with the gold rush but also came even more divisive issues to be settled. The admission of California as a state brought back the unsettled issue of slavery and once again another compromise. In October of 1849 California had established a constitution and looking favorable on Presidents Taylor’s plan to just allow California into the union and let them solve the question of slavery for themselves. And the rest of the territories that we received from Mexico could be made into another state. The admission of California as a free state would disrupt the balance in the senate, due to that Californians where set against slavery for the fear of the gold mining could become

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Missouri Compromise Dbq

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Prior to the time of the Missouri compromise, there were an equal number of slave states to free states thus there was an equal balance of power in congress. Once Missouri had applied for admission into the union there was instant disapproval from the northern territories for they had thought that the south already had a substantial amount of power. The Missouri compromise was a way to balance congress of free and slave states. The compromise itself was passed in 1820 giving Missouri the title of a slave state and Maine the title of a free state. Therefore it settled a rising dispute between the slave and free territories.…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri Compromise divided the nation into two separate parts, free or slave states. Popular sovereignty allowed the states to choose whether or not they would be free. As read in the text, “What then we do insist on, is, not to extend slavery, but that we shall not be prohibited from immigrating with our property, into the Territories of the United States” (Document 8). The South wanted to bring slavery with them and believed they had the right to do so. Although, in the North it was decided that slavery would be abolished and they would all be free states.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Missouri was well known for its slavery in the 1800s. If the Missouri Compromise didn’t happen, it was of changed the United States today greatly. The Missouri Compromise accomplished making Missouri a slave state and changing Maine into a free state because it wanted to be separated from Massachusetts. There were 22 states at the time equally divided into 11 slave states and 11 free slave states. There was chaos when the Missouri compromise was made, so they made Maine a free of slave state to even out the states.…

    • 205 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Missouri's Compromise was needed because they couldn't buy Missouri by itself because the count was at 11 free states and 11 state slaves so if Missouri was bought it needed to join as either a slave state or as a free state and it would upset the balance of the free to slave states to have equal say. So when Maine requested to join as a free state they saw it as a chance and that's when the Missouri Compromise came in place and there was then 12 to 12 slave to free states at the time so it didn't upset the balance. Thomas Jefferson felt that it was unconstitutional and was violating the Fifth Amendment that guaranteed citizens of "life, liberty, and property" and slaves were property. The Dred Scott decision was a decision made by the…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    An act passed by the U.S. Congress admitting Missouri to the Union as the 24th state. After the territory requested statehood without slavery restrictions, Northern congressmen tried unsuccessfully to attach amendments restricting further slaveholding. When Maine (originally part of Massachusetts) requested statehood, a compromise led by Henry Clay allowed Missouri admission as a slave state and Maine as a free state, with slavery prohibited from then on in territories north of Missouri's southern border. Clay's compromise…

    • 76 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery has been one of the most talked about subjects in history. It is a significantly important in our history. The Antebellum period was known for many reform movements. Slavery supported the economy of the United States, the nation went from underdeveloped farmers to becoming a driving force financially. It influenced important leaders, which eventually lead to war.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sectionalism Dbq

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Early in the eighteen hundreds, the Missouri Compromise was written to declare which states were to be known as slave states and free states. A line was drawn across the United States at latitude 36°30′ stating that each state to the north of the line and east of the Mississippi River is a free state and each state south of the line and east of the…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Missouri compromise was passed in 1820, which regulated slavery in the western states that were gained through the Louisiana purchase. This compromise contributed to the division between the north and south regarding the issue of slavery. Slavery was not allowed in anywhere north of the 36:30 parallel, but the state of Missouri allowed slavery. Fortunately, the compromise made many Americans happy and without the compromise the inevitable civil war would have occurred sooner. But unfortunately, the happiness of the country was ruined when the Missouri compromise got repealed.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    California has a long history prior to it’s entry into the United States. Indigenous Americans inhabited California for thousands of years before permanent European settlements occurred in the 1600s. California was occupied and claimed by Spain and Mexico throughout the 1600s to the late 1800s, contributing to California’s culture and history, before the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo concluded the United State’s war with Mexico and ceded California to the Unites States. In 1849 a constitutional convention was held that consisted of forty-eight delegates who represented various regions of California and who crafted a convention document . The document was was approved by the voters and on September 9, 1850 the U.S. Congress admitted California as the thirty-first state.…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1820, Congress passed the Missouri Compromise. This compromise agreed to admit Missouri as a slave state and then admit Maine as a free state to keep the balance of free and slave states in the country. It also created the 36’ 30° line. The 36’ 30° line was an imaginary line on the southern border of Missouri above which it was agreed new states could not hold slaves. Many in the south saw this as an act in support of the abolition of slavery, which helped to increase tensions between the north and south over the issue of slavery (Missouri n.d.).…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the ways the United States gained new territory is when Texas wanted to secede from Mexico and join the Union. (Doc 2) Texas wrote the Treaty of Annexation in April 22, 1844 to the United States congress granting them their property to be controlled by the United States. Texas wrote this because they wanted to have slavery, but Mexico had outlawed slavery. Mexico was not happy with this decision and resulted in the Mexican – American war, causing casualties. This war also led to more tension and bloodshed in the long run, because of an increase in sectionalism between the North and South.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Mexican War ended and the Missouri Compromise On February 2nd of 1848, the war between Mexico and America came to an end at the city of Guadalupe Hidalgo. The war lasted for 2 years. Mexico and America was fighting for the land of California and New Mexico and who would receive it. In 1844, Democrat James Polk won the election and became president.…

    • 2689 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is the minds of powerful and brilliant thinkers from every era of history that have led to the world we live in today. James Madison made a positive impact on the United States through his many political actions. During the Constitutional Convention, Madison created the Virginia plan. While he was the secretary of state, he acquired the Louisiana Territory. While he was the fourth president of the United States, he lead the country defiantly against the British during the War of 1812.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States expanded across North America to the west at a rapid rate most notably in the 1840’s through the 1850s. Many social, econonomic, and political factors lead to the nations growth and acquisition of land. Social interests included families’ desire to seek more land out west along with economic opportunities for interstate commerce and political agendas concerning territorial expansion. The Louisiana Purchase of 1803 from the French government, by President Thomas Jefferson, cost $15 million, and included territory from Canada to New Orleans, and the Mississippi to the Rocky Mountains (Westward Expansion, 2009). The purchase of these territories doubled United States’ size and according to Jefferson it was crucial to the nation’s…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was America justified in going to war with Mexico? Before April 25, 1846, American you know today wasn't the same If America didn’t go to war with Mexico, American would only be half of the size it was today. This all started because Texas declared its independence from Mexico. Mexico wasn’t so thrilled about Texas actions. Which, leads to the question, was America justified to war with Mexico?…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays