Evaluate Milgram's Experiment Essay

Improved Essays
Obedience is ‘’compliance with an order, request, law or submission to another’s authority’’. Eichmann, who killed four million Jews, was described to be terrifyingly normal and stated that he was just following orders. Milgram (1963) conducted multiple experiments to investigate how strong an authorities influence was over other’s sense of morals and how far they were able to make them obey. One of the biggest limitations that Milgram’s experiment faced was his ecological validity, the ability to generalize his findings to the real-world. His first experiment could have been considered ethnocentrically bias, favoring only your own cultural society. All of the self-selected applicants were white males from America, meaning that his findings were unable to be globally …show more content…
To counteract the possibility of Demand characteristics and the fact his experiment was criticized for lacking ecological validity Milgram continued to replicate his experiment. The new variations of his experiment involved the teacher having to read out word pairs to the student, Milgram had a confederate initiate the shock, the outcome of this proved further evidence of people’s capabilities to obey to authority with 92.5% of people continuing onto the 450volts. However, despite Milgram replicating his experiment to avoid this, it can be argued otherwise. Orne and Holland (1972) argued that Milgram’s participants may have simply been trying to ‘be good participants’ and suggested Milgram’s work lacked experimental realism. This claim can be supported by some of the Volunteers claiming that they didn’t think the researcher would have let anyone come to harm. However many participants showed signs of stress, such as sweating, trembling and stuttering making it hard to suggested that they thought it was a fake

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Stanely Milgram was a social phycologist who conducted an experiment in 1963 about nonviolent people being capable of hurting others due to obeying the authority under pressure despite their feeling of remorse. The way the experiment received progression was by having people play the role of a teacher and a learner. The teacher obeys the authority and the learner had to memorize a certain amount of words. If the learner failed to the duty, he would received a punishment of a dose of high voltage shock. Although the purpose of the experiment was to test how the learner was capable of learning, it to was to test the capability of the teacher to continue the experiment whether or not they felt guilt.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The goal of this paper is to review and analyze the article written by Stanley Milgram in 1963. This experiment was considered to be one of the most acknowledged research in the history of social psychology that revealed the unpredicted side of human nature. The author described the tendencies of obedience as inevitable part of our lives, particularly since we live in the complex systems of society where human interaction is unavoidable. He illustrated that this specific tendencies of human behavior was extremely relevant at this specific time in history, during which millions of innocent lives had systematically been lost through wars and fascist movements. It is clearly evident that the author became deeply curious about the nature of “obedience”…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Milgram Obedience Experiment, a series of experiments originating from July 1961, serves as one of the most significant and influential experiments done in history due to its investigation of the conflict between obligation and obedience to authority and personal morality. The experiment was conducted by Stanley Milgram, an American social psychologist that primarily explored social behavior but is best known for the way he tackled the issue of the true power and influence of figures in authority after the Holocaust. Due to the shock of many at the discovery that human beings were capable of such horrible things during the Jewish genocide of World War II, the Milgram Experiment was conducted to identify exactly how the horrible acts of…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram proposed that people operate on two levels. First, they operate as autonomous individuals, where they act according to their own values and beliefs. Second, they act on an agentic level where they see themselves as agents, acting on behalf of somebody else and not responsible for their own actions. He asserted that it is possible to move from an autonomous state into an agentic state; this is referred to as an agentic shift (Milgram, 1963). A consequence of this shift is that an individual no longer feels responsible for their actions.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Obedience to Authority Experiment In 1963 at Yale University, Stanley Milgram held an experiment to test the relationship between obedience to authority and the personal conscience. Stanley Milgram’s obedience experiment was one of the many experiments that caused the gathering of the APA, because of its lack of ethics and an analysis of the experiment provides information that could justify for the genocide acts of World War II. The experiment included 40 male participants who drew straws which determined whether they were the learner or the experimenter. Only this was rigged so that the participant was always the experimenter instead of it being random and thinking they had a choice. They were also introduced to Milgram who was head of this experiment.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    "Obedience is as basic an element in the structure of social life as one can point to," says Stanley Milgram in his essay, "The Perils of Obedience" (Milgram 78). As he prepared to conduct a more extreme case of analyzing obedience in which test subjects would read off a group of words while the "learner," who was an actor, would have to pair the two correct words together, only to be shocked in an electric chair if they failed, Milgram hypothesized that the test subjects would listen to their conscience and disobey the immoral orders to continue the experiment (Milgram 79). After testing forty original subjects, Milgram was rather surprised at the outcome: although many subjects argued about continuing, when given the satisfaction that the outcome of the learner was not the subject's responsibility but the…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Michael Shermer in “What Milgram’s Shock Experiment Really Meant” describes the obedience as being fueled by fear and the unknown of what may happen to the participant. Saul Mcleod wrote “Obedience to Authority” and he also expresses that fear is a key factor. In “What Milgram’s Shock Experiment Really Meant”, Shermer conducted an experiment of an exact replica of Milgram’s shock experiment. One of his test subjects, Lateefah, was stopped in the middle of her experiment because she was considerably uncomfortable.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The experiment in “The Perils of Obedience” by Stanley Milgram, Yale psychologist, has triggered many responses to the question of an individual’s willingness to obey and the credibility of the experiment he performed. Ian Parker, a regular writer for the New Yorker and common voice in other political/scientific compositions, has come to the table with his opinion and outside sources to discuss the facts of Milgram’s experiment and its consequences in his essay, “Obedience.” Milgram claims through his experiment on obedience we can logically determine an idea of the thought processes of the Nazis (Milgriam 89). This experiment arrived at the conclusion that people are surprisingly obedient to a legitimate authority figure even when the orders…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Perils of Obedience” written by Stanley Milgram and “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience” written by Diana Baumrind are both intriguing articles about Stanley Milgram’s experiments on obedience. Diana Baumrind believes that Stanley Milgram failed at his experiences on obedience rather than succeeded. Stanley Milgram believed that he succeeded on his experiments if an authority figure tells the test subject to do something then the test subject will. “Stanley Milgram designed an experiment that forced participants either to violate their conscience by obeying the immoral demands of an authority figure or to refuse those demands” (Milgram 77). While both authors address experiments on obedience, Stanley Milgram approaches…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to professor Haslam from the University of Queensland, in Milgram’s study, participants did not actually obey explicit orders but instead committed cruel acts because they strongly identified with the science. In Milgram’s study, an experimenter asked participants to administer increasing shocks to other people if they gave an incorrect answer. Most of the participants obeyed the order to administer a lethal dose of shock to another person. Milgram…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article "The Perils of Obedience” Stanley Milgram describes obedience as a basic element in the structure of social life and the effects it has on all communal living(Milgram 693). What if one is asked to be obedient to something that doesn’t aline with their personal morals? Milgram wanted to run an experiment to find this out. He simply wanted to know if the Nazis were acting out in pure evil or just simply following direct orders by a person who, they thought, was placed in a position of authority. In order to do this, he sets out to test how a normal person reacts when given violent orders by a person, who they believe are in a place of authority.…

    • 2072 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    She argues that the experiment was affecting the participant even after they were done and had been de-briefed of what the study was actually about, as well as seeing and talking to the ”learner” (the guy who they thought they were electrocuting). Baumrind was also arguing the fact the the experiment had little ecological validity as subjects are more prone to abide in such environments, she also states that participants experienced long-term, negative psychological consequences as a result of their participation in Milgram’s experiment. Milgram had counterpoints for all of her statements, explaining himself and his thought process and why it was necessary towards the experiment. Baumrind says that Milgram 's experimental situations are not sufficiently accurate models of real-life experience, his sampling techniques are seldom of a scope which would justify the meaning with which he would like to endow his result, as well as result are hard to reproduce. These combined is considered unethical, as this experiment would never have been accepted by any institutions today.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s social experiment was an experiment in which laypeople (all white and male) were asked to deliver shocks to actors at the instruction of a scientist. The actor would beg the participant to stop delivering shocks, but the scientist would continue to insist that they continue, relieving them of responsibility if the actor “died,” which it was heavily implied they would. The significant majority delivered what would have been a killing shock, to the surprise of many of the scientists working on it. It was found that a lot of humanity (or, at least, white males) had the capacity for murder if instructed to by the right people; there was a clear blind trust for authority figures. On July 17th, 2014, Eric Garner died from a cop’s…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s experiment on obedience to authority is one of the best known studies in social psychology. It was repeated several times in different variations. These replications extended our knowledge about the phenomenon of complying to authorities’ orders. One of them was the experiment conducted by Hofling et al. This essay will outline the similarities and differences between these two studies.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Diana Baumrind often disagreed with the ethics of the Milgram Experiment; however, Ian Parker took on a different perspective than she. Diana Baumrind, author of, Review of Stanley Milgram 's Experiments on Obedience, claims in his experiments the ethics he possessed were immoral and wrong. Throughout her article she continually disagreed with everything Milgram had "achieved", starting from the first experiments results which appeared as a review in American Psychologist in 1963 (Baumrind 89). While Diana disputed what she thought was the atrocious ethics of Milgram 's experiments, she furthermore believed Milgram should have debriefed the subjects more than what he had done (95). Although Baumrind opinionated her thoughts on these issues,…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays