There are five theories of Philosophy written into his context below which are “Social contract or contractarian, Classic liberalism or libertarianism, Marxism, Communitarians, and Capabilities approach”. Comparing each one of these political philosophy, theories will show how some may be similar to one another and how the different theories are.
First to be up for discussion is the Social contract. Philosopher Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. These two philosopher’s “both wanted the public to ensure the right with the social compact but Locke purpose was also to protect nature rights” (Moore & Bruden, 2013, Chapter Chapter 11). The most about these two philosophers are that each wanted the same purpose for the public, but one wanted further. …show more content…
The philosopher who has studied this theory is, John Rawls, one on the most famous Communitarian critic. As this being said, John Rawls “the principle of the equal liberty that is subordinate to goods of the society organism” (Moore & Bruden, 2013, Chapter Chapter 12). John Rawls would have criticized different philosopher’s, on what his or her theory. Rawls would disagree about the theories for what opinion found. For example, the nation has many different opportunities today, meaning that a person would have his or her opinions on things that are called ordinary …show more content…
The philosopher for the Capabilities approach is Martha Nussbaum. The philosopher has social justice for these different capabilities of, Martha Nussbaum. There are “three unfinished pieces of during justice to people with disabilities and mental illness” (Moore & Bruden, 2013, Chapter Chapter 12). For example, anyone in the nation can provide the human right to having excellent health. A person today may have excellent health to see if one has a mental illness or even disability. If those having problems, this is where a psychologist comes in to see how to determine a person health mentally and
First to be up for discussion is the Social contract. Philosopher Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. These two philosopher’s “both wanted the public to ensure the right with the social compact but Locke purpose was also to protect nature rights” (Moore & Bruden, 2013, Chapter Chapter 11). The most about these two philosophers are that each wanted the same purpose for the public, but one wanted further. …show more content…
The philosopher who has studied this theory is, John Rawls, one on the most famous Communitarian critic. As this being said, John Rawls “the principle of the equal liberty that is subordinate to goods of the society organism” (Moore & Bruden, 2013, Chapter Chapter 12). John Rawls would have criticized different philosopher’s, on what his or her theory. Rawls would disagree about the theories for what opinion found. For example, the nation has many different opportunities today, meaning that a person would have his or her opinions on things that are called ordinary …show more content…
The philosopher for the Capabilities approach is Martha Nussbaum. The philosopher has social justice for these different capabilities of, Martha Nussbaum. There are “three unfinished pieces of during justice to people with disabilities and mental illness” (Moore & Bruden, 2013, Chapter Chapter 12). For example, anyone in the nation can provide the human right to having excellent health. A person today may have excellent health to see if one has a mental illness or even disability. If those having problems, this is where a psychologist comes in to see how to determine a person health mentally and