Locke On Duty

Improved Essays
Introduction:
First Example:
Second Example: Additionally, another property to the claim of inconvertibility is the inessentiality of any resultant duties. Many argue that humans need duties to attain certain rights. For the reason that animals do not need rights due to the notion that they are unable to deliver any duties, while humans are able to give and take in return. However, there is the great question of what is exactly a duty. There are two variations of duties; the positive and negative. Positive duties are the notion of performing an act. Accordingly, paying taxes earns you the right to free health care. On the other hand, negative duties is the secondary result of rights. Expressly, the only duty that is relative to human rights
…show more content…
Locke introduced the benefit theory of rights which is the notion that the duties that are corresponding with rights are to adhere to the rights of others, as a result there is a …show more content…
Gunther portrayed the problem with due acknowledgement of the possible for speech to aid as a defence of prejudice. He claimed that “speech should not and cannot be banned simply because it is ‘offensive’ to substantial parts of, or a majority of, a community. The refusal to suppress offensive speech is one of the most difficult obligations the free speech principle imposes upon all of us; yet it is also one of the First Amendment 's greatest glories — indeed, it is a central test of a community 's commitment to free speech” (). However, if a hierarchy of rights is constructed then the protection against advocacy of racial or religious hatred in the ICCPR Act 20 is definitely more important in this circumstance than expressing offensive language under the protection of the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion in UDHR Act 18 and the ICCPR Act 18. The reality of protecting someone or a group of people from offensive language, that provokes hatred and discrimination, is far more important than giving people the right to speak freely. As Locke said the only duty concerning human rights is complying with the actual rights in essence. Therefore, the right to a safe environment free of racial and hatred discrimination is highly

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He contests relativism by stating that such a view is ridiculous primarily because of the wide range of immoral acts “X” could possibly be. He gives the practice of human sacrifice as an example and calls into question the dubiousness of moral relativity in such a situation. According to moral relativity even if “we” were to disagree on such a practice, if that society practices the act (Bernard citing the Ashanti tribe) approves of it, then we have no place in interfering with the tribe. Williams also points out that any society must have a sort of universal moral standard for it to even exist. He notes how any society will have certain standards ingrained within its members and that these ingrained morals cannot simply just be forced aside when confronted with a separate society with differing morals.…

    • 1298 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, in this theory, deontologists say that in order for moral rules to be universal (be applicable for everyone) and necessary (a duty no matter the reality of the world), they cannot be based on something that makes society happy; since, what makes people happy can always change. Some of the similarities that these three theories have are that they seek the common good for all. However, at the same time, there are different units of analysis for the Utilitarianism theories. For instance, the unit of analysis of Act-Utilitarianism is measuring particular cases, while the unit of an analysis of Rule-Utilitarianism applies equally for everyone. In conclusion, this philosophy paper has the aim to explore the decision making of both Act and Rule Utilitarian theories based on the evaluation of a scenario and the decision made according to their understanding of what is correct.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The formula of humanity is treating people with dignity and autonomy and not as a mere means, which devalues them to the status of a thing. This formula 's main duty is a negative one, to not interfere in situations where an agent can exercise agency. In addition, a person requires positive rights – education, security, healthcare, etc; the ability to be autonomous. The formula of universal law basically states that we can evaluate the correctness of a person 's actions by what other rational agents would do in the same situation. At this stage of the moral theory a maxim is determined; it puts into focus what a person seeks, how they plan to achieve it, and the realization of an end.…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    She also writes the director's decision of the action stating Ian Walters said ¨He is not welcome here. His views are repugnant and have absolutely nothing to do with what goes on here¨ (Clemmitts). This move silenced Spencer´s free speech but it worked to protect the rights of those who aren't white since he is also a supporter of an ¨all white ethno-state¨ (Clemmitts). Many people agreed with Walter´s decision but there were many who called it a violation of the first amendment that was rooted in political correctness. This case exposes the true paradox of free speech, that, to protect free speech, some of it must be censored.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Contractarianism isn’t a great way to determine if animals have rights or not. We have some direct duties to animals because they are to be treated fairly and also acting as a n indirect duty is not entirely true for animals. An objection would be Animals have inherent value, just not as much as human. But even saying this means that you would have to agree that animals have rights to a certain extent. Animals don’t have the intelligence and thought process as human beings which easily distinguish them.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Freedom of speech is only a part of humans` freedom in general, although it is one of the most valuable parts of freedom. And of course with freedom here come responsibilities. If one openly expresses ideas and thoughts he ought to understand that aftermath he must answer for his words. This means that if a human lies, he will answer for this, if insults someone, he will also answer for this. Having an opportunity of free speech requires the strong understanding of such kind of responsibility.…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Deontology Theory

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It also tells us that we can never use humans as a means to an end, but consider them as unique creatures with human dignity. And finally on categorical imperatives, it dictates us to treat other people as we ought to be treated. Therefore to sum all these we found the collection of social media data, violates the moral law in that the exercise don’t apply morals in both situations. The exercise only focuses on safety and to criminalize somebody, but not considering the innocents and their privacy. The action of collecting social media data is definitely treating people’s information as a means to an end.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is derived from envisioning a system in which every human helps one another in every achievable scenario. While this theoretical world is possible, the implications that not constantly expending energy to help others is somehow morally unconscionable is overly demanding and relegates the act of helping as an imperfect duty—an action that is good, but is not required. While the act of saving an animal from the clutches of a carnivore could be viewed as morally good, because it creates an overly demanding system, it cannot be viewed as an obligate duty, permitting the lack of a police state for the autonomy of…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This lack of moral guidelines places the well-being of each individual that falls subject to these laws at risk. Whereas, for natural law theory, there is no physical legitimacy to it. One can argue that morality differs depending on the location and culture. If it’s not enforced by man, but by God, those that do not believe in God or have other beliefs could argue that they are not subject to these laws. Many have challenged legitimacy of laws that are not imposed by those in power, but the advantage to natural law theory is the fact that it protects the rights of those under the law, which would be everyone on the earth since it universal.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The view that we are human animals, "animalism", is a very unpopular view. However, those who deny it face an awkward choice. They must either deny that there are any human animals, deny that human animals can think, or deny that we are the thinking things located where we are. It is a truism that you and I are human beings and that a human being is a kind of animal: roughly a member of the primate species Homo sapiens. It would naturally seem to follow that we are animals.…

    • 1800 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays