Mistreatment Of Caliban In Shakespeare's The Tempest

Improved Essays
Frias 5

Some people might think of Shakespeare?s story The Tempest, as just that, a story about a man who has his position as Duke of Milan usurped by his less than pleasant brother. However, after a careful analysis of The Tempest it is easy to see how prominent the mistreatment of Caliban is and why it is written that way. Throughout the story Caliban is put down multiple times in various manners by different people.
We first hear of Caliban in Prospero?s conversation with Ariel and right off the bat we know that Prospero has a disdain for Caliban when he offhandedly comments that Caliban was ?hag born? and ?not honored with a human shape? (Graff, and Phelan 24). Prospero does not focus much on Caliban in that moment and it is easy to say that it did not really mean anything, but it is common knowledge that when there is respect between people, words like that are not used. Prospero did not use respectful words when speaking about Caliban so it is obvious that Prospero dislikes him.
Later on in the story we learn that the reason Prospero did not favor Caliban was because Caliban took advantage of Prospero?s hospitality and attempted to copulate with
…show more content…
Asma. Asma tells us about Alexander who told story of how he and his army encountered giant crabs, three horned wolf like animals, serpents, and dragons. Alexander told this story from his own perspective, it is similar to how the victors of a war get to write history because Alexander too was a victor against all of these supposed creatures and wrote history about them. Asma writes about how it is very likely that Alexander embellished his story. Psychologists believe that it is common human tendency to exaggerate storied because of perception (Hoffman 159). Alexander?s perspective was skewed due to fear and Shakespeare?s due to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Alexander used his smartness and quick-thinking skills to win battles in the heat of the moment. Once he was about to cross a river when he saw that Porus, the enemy, was directly across from him and his army, “When Alexander saw this, he [decided to] move his troops in all different directions so that Porus would keep puzzled” (Doc A). In like manner in a game of…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    People may have encountered Alexander and discovered his false prophecies and tricks but were motivated, by possible compensations, to stay quiet and help Alexander…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stories are often reshaped in order to for different people, religions, and cultures to relate, but it can be assumed that not any as much as the tale of Alexander the Great. Alexander the Great was crowned king at twenty years old after his fathers’ death, and for most of his kingship, he traveled on a military campaign in hopes of conquering all of the known world. Considering the tale of Alexander the Great is so prevalent throughout the world, many have molded it to fit their own cultures because of his powerfulness. Therefore, problematizing dichotomies of the East and West differ throughout each version. Richard Stoneman’s, translation of the Pseudo-Callisthenes focuses on Alexander the Great’s domination from Greece to Africa and Asia.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Perspective fundamentally alters how history is interpreted. This concept becomes particularly evident in regards to history’s greatest rulers and conquerors, such as Alexander the Great, the Macedonian king who established one of the world’s most substantial empires. However, despite this external facade of glory, Alexander the Great’s legacy was imbued with acts of terror and pointless bloodshed, all of which can be found within the perspectives of his victims. Through his actions in his personal life and his invasions of Thebes, Persia, Egypt, and India, Alexander the Great was undeniably a villain.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander, a fearless leader, always ran towards danger. With his bold mind, he could approach dangerous scenarios without fear. For example, when he was given a ferocious horse, who…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There is always a piece of literature that ignites a discussion of controversy among its audience. Whether it be the theme, or the ending, without an expression for change, the true meaning of literature piece proves no evidence. There are some changes that evidently have disagreements, however, they too add to a deeper understanding of the meaning of the change. Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare is a controversial play about Julius Caesar’s personage and whether the play is his tragedy. In the play, multiple instances occur where the reader the reader is questioned to believe that the play’s tragedy surrounds Brutus and not Caesar.…

    • 203 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Here, Alexander entered into battle with Porus, the king of India, the outcome being the Macedonians as victorious and Porus taken prisoner. However Alexander gave Porus back control of his own kingdom “as satrap under himself” as Alexander intended to venture further east across the Hyphasis River due to hearing the land was fertile and good. But Alexander failed to notice the mood of his army: “… the spirit of the Macedonians now began to flag, when they saw the king raising one labour after another, and incurring one danger after another” . This attitude could have also been influenced by Alexander’s recent executions of Parmenio and his son Philotas after hearing of their alleged involvement in a plot to kill him. “These actions rendered Alexander an object of terror to many of his friends…” and would certainly not have boded well for his reputation amongst his troops.…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Caliban from Shakespeare’s The Tempest, and the inmates from Shakespeare Behind Bars suffer a demotion due to poor decisions - from free man, to scum-of-the-earth. Caliban is considered friend to Prospero until he attempts to rapes Miranda, from which he is punished and considered slave to Prospero from then on. Similarly, the inmates at Luther Luckett have committed horrid crimes ranging from theft, to rape, to murder. These actions contain consequences that alter one’s reputation permanently, which can lower self-esteem and self-image. These are the exact problems that the Shakespeare Behind Bars program targets through the teaching of The Tempest.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Egypt became the center for Greek culture and because of that Alexander was a influence on the Egyptians developments. Alexander was capable of giving mercy, but he also knew when he needed to take action. The Thebans called him the “Tyrant of Greece”. Alexander was afraid of losing the unification of Greeks and…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Scene 2, Caliban only spoke with a frustrated tone when he talked to or about Prospero. Otherwise, he spoke as if he were powerless and futile. He labeled Prospero as “the tyrant that I serve (139)!” In the meantime, Stephano and Trinculo treated Caliban as if he was an animal that could be ordered around and subdued. Stephano told Trinculo, “[h]e(Caliban) shall taste of my bottle… it will go near to remove his fit… he shall pay for him that hath him (66-68),” and, “all the wine in my bottle will recover him (80-81).”…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander’s achievements can be noted and analysed in terms of his widespread influence and continuing force in the ancient world, of which we are aware, and his egotistical faith in his own being. Alexander succeeded in many places throughout his career, and went on to dissolve the Persian Empire and beyond, for his own. Alexander was born into a situation, entitling him to be an absolute monarch, but despite this, it is perhaps true that he was in fact a charismatic and courageous leader. Though much of what we know of Alexander’s life and achievements can be seen to be overstated with the man creating his own legend .…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Homer’s epics have left an undisputable and profound influence on Western literature. However, outside of the realm of literature, Homer’s ideas about honor, kingship, and leadership continued to affect the political world hundreds of years after his death. Specifically, Homer’s impact on Alexander the Great played a central role in not only the way Alexander saw himself, but also in the way he established and ruled the largest empire on earth. From an early age, Alexander was exposed to The Iliad and The Odyssey under the instruction of his teacher, Aristotle. The parallels between Alexander and Achilles are striking; for instance, both are undoubtedly the most remarkable warriors.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Forgiveness is the key which unlocks the door of resentment and the handcuffs of hatred. It breaks the chains of bitterness and the shackles of selfishness” (Corrie Ten Boom, Jesus is Victor 95). Believed to have been written in 1610-11, The Tempest by William Shakespeare acquaints readers with Prospero, the rightful Duke of Milan, who was exiled to an island with his daughter Miranda so that his brothers can rule the kingdom. After causing his brothers to believe that their ship has wrecked, through the power of magic, Prospero constructs various obstacles for his brothers to be put through in an effort to get revenge on them for leaving him to die. Having sought out various revengeful options, Prospero learns that the best form of revenge he can get on his brothers, using justice and mercy, is the act of simple forgiveness.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thus Caliban, however, is not even offered freedom and is instead kept under Prospero’s control even at the very end of the play. While Ariel obeys Prospero for the eventual acquisition of freedom, Caliban obeys Prospero for his own survival. Caliban’s inability to truly decide his own future is further displayed by the fact that he himself rarely gets to fulfil the ten syllable rule of the iambic pentameter present in Shakespeare’s works. Instead his lines are quite often finished by a different character, for…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Prospero can be seen as a representation of the Europeans who usurped the land of native Americans and enslaved them. He, as a sense of superiority, takes Caliban as half man. Pushing the original inhabitants of the island to the side, he places himself at the helm of affairs. He has full control over everything on the island. He makes servants out of Ariel and Caliban and unforms and reforms the island and the inhabitants in his own image.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays