Lucian's Alexander The False Prophet

Superior Essays
Appearances are often misleading and not everything one sees is true. In Alexander the False Prophet, Lucian exposes Alexander as a fraud by pointing out Alexander’s manipulative actions to deceive others and by revealing Alexander’s methods of deceptions. Lucian successfully convinces his readers that Alexander is a scammer and a false prophet due to his credibility factor which includes his personal connections to the subject of his writing. Lucian accomplished it by describing Alexander’s bad nature and by revealing Alexander’s illogical procedures to scam people. Alexander was a great conqueror, but his qualities as a scammer were similarly good in which he persuaded others into believing him despite his ulterior motives. In Alexander …show more content…
In one occasion Alexander tricks the people into believing that he knew about the birth of a god in physical form, a serpent, before it happened (Alexander the False Prophet, 13-14). Lucian explained the logical approach of Alexander’s actions at the temple and the reasons for not letting anyone see the serpent so he could claim that it had grown at a rapid rate. The trick was making others believe that the serpent was born under the temple, where Alexander placed it the night before, but the scam done to get monetary benefits from the oracles of the serpent. Alexander would also only present the serpent in poor conditions and dim light so the people would not notice the fake big serpent but the people were impressed by the docile action of touching it. Moreover, Lucian exposed Alexander false oracles by illustrating a few methods in which Alexander could have performed. Alexander requested envelopes with the peoples’ deepest wonders and he would answer them without opening the envelope. However, Lucian provides methods of opening envelopes with the most minimal damage and brings the rational side of the situation. (Alexander the False Prophet, ADD NUMBER) Per the sound evidence and logical approach, the scam and tricks of Alexander were obviously fake if analyzed just like Lucian did to expose …show more content…
Lucians effectively use personal experience to reveal Alexander’s unscrupulous and impudent behavior. One main occasion that Lucian highlights about Alexander’s scams is when Alexander presented himself in front of Lucian. As indicated by Lucian, Alexander manipulated others at his advantage to improve his social and economic status. He would threat those who were against him which induced Lucian into having two guards with him when presenting himself to Alexander. Alexander acted like with the public and extended his hand, expecting it to be kissed, to his surprise when Lucian bit it. Instead of Lucian being respectful towards Alexander, he remained truthful to himself but “bystanders tried to choke and beat” (Alexander the False Prophet, 55) him. Alexander, shortly after, stated that he could “transformed even bitter foes into friends” (Alexander the False Prophet, 55) but Lucian did not have a change of heart but rather influenced by the threats and benefits of been on Alexander’s good side. Lucian could use the connections Alexander had which means that if Lucian agrees to Alexander’s acquaintance. This situation further indicates how Alexander threated people to follow his demands. People may have encountered Alexander and discovered his false prophecies and tricks but were motivated, by possible compensations, to stay quiet and help Alexander

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Poison King by Adrienne Mayor The book, Poison King by Adrienne Mayor, portrays a life that is characterized with manifestation and anticipation. It asserts Alexander the Great together with Darius of Persia as Mithradates predecessors who acquired a rich wealthy Black Sea kingdom when he was a teenager at 14years after his mother killed his father. He escaped into exile but came back in triumph to be a king of top notch intellect and stern objectives. He is seen as a savior by his supporters and treated in awe as a second Hannibal by his foes (Mayor, Mithradates p. 34).…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alexander is deserving of the name “the Great” because he conquered all the land also, He was very giving. In document A ,it states “He conquered 11 cities and put them in his name ” Also, in document A he had about “40,000 men”. “This is shows that he is great because he was able to conquer and put them in his name also he had over 40,000 trustworthy men. In document E , It states “he was giving ”. It describes in source D he was giving by saying “He poured the water on the ground performing a miracle”.…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Christi Justice HST101 Armounte Document Analysis: The Life of Alexander by Plutarch Questions: 1. According to Plutarch, was Alexander an educated man? For a man of his time, Alexander was a very educated man. His father, Phillip, thought that Alexander’s education was so important that he had Aristotle, who was “the most famous and learned philosophers of his time” (page 2), be his teacher.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alexander The Great Cons

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Alexander the Great Alexander the Great was a man who had dreams and longed to pursue them. There are many ways that Alexander respected and disrespected the people in his city. Alexander respected the Egyptian beliefs, including their gods. Although he did have many cons to him being “king or ruler” of the city. He also seeked to get revenge and bring pain to the rivals in many different ways.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The author begins the book with Alexander’s background and childhood; he tells the readers about Alexander’ talents and abilities that were revealed fairly early in his life. For example, Alexander entertains the envoys from the King of Persia “by asking no childish or trivial questions” (Plutarch 235). Also, “while [Alexander] was still a boy his self-restraint showed itself in the fact that, although he was impetuous and violent in other matters, the pleasures of the body had little hold upon him, and he indulged in them with great moderation, while his ambition kept his spirit serious and lofty in advance of his years” (Plutarch 233). Via these phrases, Plutarch demonstrates how mature Alexander is since he was little and inwardly puts baits that a fine child becomes a fine man. In addition, “[Alexander] was not only fond of the theory of medicine, but actually came to the aid of his friends when they were sick, and prescribed for them certain treatments……

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays
    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Alexander showed no mercy to innocent people, or even his own men. Although history has credited Alexander the “great” with building the largest empire the ancient world has ever seen, few realize his cruel,…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alexander the Great was a villain who knew how to manipulate people into thinking he was the good guy. Alexander had his fair share of good guy moments but overall Alexander used the good side people saw to manipulate them into doing as he wanted. Due to Alexander’s violence and mistreat to the human race he is villain. When Alexander the Great conquered new land he usually treated the people and the land in a cruel and disrespectful manner.…

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Then in document D it says “Alexander said thank you for the water, then dumped it on the ground. The water could have been use for a drink for his whole army.” This proves that Alexander was not fair to his army and was brutal to them. Finally, in document E it says that it took 11 years to make Alexander’s empire. It also says that the empire lasted 10 years after Alexander died.…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alexander liked to win and he was very powerful. He was able to…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Alexander the Great has been revered as military genius, tactician, and godlike conqueror. Many of the accounts taken down of his life make him out to be the hero of Western culture and practice. The peoples he conquered and the territories he took over worshipped him as a god and even placed him alongside the likes of Zeus and Ra. The main source used to gain knowledge of Alexander’s life stems from historians and philosophers, such as Quintus Curtius, Plutarch, and Arrian. These writers recorded the events that took place in his life as though they shared close ties to Alexander.…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A villain is a person who has done many awful things. Alexander the Great was a bad person because he was not able to lead the people in the right way. Putting your culture into life threatening positions at all time would not want people to live in that area. Alexander the Great was a villain because he was really selfish and greedy and destroyed many cultures. Alexander the Great was a villain because he was really selfish and greedy.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During Alexander’s power trip he has caused a lot of…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The life and history of Alexander the Great, and the empire that he formed, has been studied by people ever since his death. Alexander’s empire ruled over a large portion of land from Greece in the west to India, in the east. His actions brought an end to the long standing conflict that the Persians and Greeks had with each other, established multiple cities that bore his name across the land that he conquered, had a major influence on future rulers, and had remnants that lasted until the time of the Roman Empire. Alexander not only had a prominent place in history, but he also contributed to advancements in military tactics of the ancient world. The life of Alexander had a far reaching effect on world history that lasted for centuries after his death, and the study of his life can help a person understand various facets of history that were inspired or influenced by his actions.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Homer’s epics have left an undisputable and profound influence on Western literature. However, outside of the realm of literature, Homer’s ideas about honor, kingship, and leadership continued to affect the political world hundreds of years after his death. Specifically, Homer’s impact on Alexander the Great played a central role in not only the way Alexander saw himself, but also in the way he established and ruled the largest empire on earth. From an early age, Alexander was exposed to The Iliad and The Odyssey under the instruction of his teacher, Aristotle. The parallels between Alexander and Achilles are striking; for instance, both are undoubtedly the most remarkable warriors.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays