The Secret Sharer Alberto Manguel Analysis

Improved Essays
Should Publishers Edit?
In “The Secret Sharer”, Alberto Manguel takes a cynical stance on whether publishers should edit the author’s work. He believes that by having writers’ work to be edited “we may perhaps me missing something fabulously new…unique”. He even mentions that some people have gone as far as comparing editors to Procustes, a Greek robber, who has “placed his visitors on an iron bed and stretched them or cut off the overhanging parts until they fitted exactly to his liking (Manguel, 132).” This is a faulty comparison as editing and torturing people have no relation to each other, though some may disagree. Manguel details editors as people who will reduce literature to a set of rules and tinge their opinion with their authority. He questions what they actually do as editors, since they have many functions, and brings into question whether writers are the only author of their work after an editor has gone through it. As a writer himself, his opinion sounds bias, and that feeling comes across in the beginning of this piece where he mentions in the second paragraph that “this paragraph you are now reading will not be the paragraph I originally wrote, since it will have to undergo
…show more content…
He is correct if a writer wants to be published by a publishing company, but in today’s industry, that belief is dated. With the arrival of e-books and self-publishing, writers no longer need to go through editors to be published; they can be their own editor or have a friend no it. But that does not mean that editors are no longer important. Self-publishing is one direction writers can go in if they share the same views as Manguel, or if they writing is not being recognized by publishers. A proper editor is still beneficial for a writer to use, because they work with the writer to make the work the best it can

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    If Blimgrat chose to revise or revisit this work, he may feel the need to create other paths for other to follow his ideas. Another key flaw can be providing too many ideas and not enough self-input. How does one feel about it, can also create a relationship between author and reader and maybe able to push other into the side he believes in. The article feel more of a part of a book then an article someone with a voice and opinion wrote. If someone such as Blimgrat gets the chance to voice an opinion even at the end of the article, then they should then just be overstuffing an article with facts.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Creon returns to Thebes, he is angered to learn that Oedipus accuses he and Tiresias of conspiring to manufacture a false prophecy and usurp Oedipus for his power as king. Because Oedipus does not have the knowledge that he is actually the source of the plague, he confronts Creon about this his involvement, stating: “I had not come to an agreement with you, Tiresias would never called the murder of Laius my work” (Sophocles 38). Oedipus is less knowledgeable than the audience, causing him to believe that others are trying to take his power rather than tell him…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Orwell explains that his writing is a product of the times, and that if he had lived in peaceful times it would be likely that his fiction would be very different than it is ow. However, he writes about what is necessary to write about: anti-totalitarianism and pro-democracy. What is interesting to this reader was Orwell’s confessions at the end of the essay, stating that all writers are rather possessed by a strange demon because writing is really not very enjoyable.…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He calls this phenomenon the “disaster” that is frequenting our society. As a result, he tries to persuade the reader into valuing literature as highly as he does. An example of this, can be seen when he states that he can not die without certain books or having published things he’s written. This takes away from his credibility as he is not objectively providing evidence for his claim. Likewise, he first introduces this “disaster” through quoting a fellow author, Virginia Woolf.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second prolog of the novel begins by Miguel De Cervantes expressing his frustrations with the author who published a fake sequel to Don Quixote. This metafictional approach uses irony to address the plagiarism and blends the two worlds of reality and fiction. Cervantes claims he does not want to malign the dishonest author, Avellaneda. However, Cervantes goes on ranting about how this counterfeit author should ashamed of himself. As the paragraph progresses, there is a sense of growing frustration as Cervantes states “I know very well what the temptations of the devil are, and one of the greatest is to give a man the idea that he can compose and publish a book and thereby win as much fame and fortunes, as much fortune as fame…” (Cervantes…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gallop diverges from talking about the technique of close reading, into talking about multiculturalism and how it affects literature. Gallops uses Shakespeare as an example of how once people started paying attention to what his work was about, that they would no longer appreciate it. Many believe Shakespeare to be a legendary playwright, and a master in the dramatic arts, but his worked was heavily laced with both sexism and racism. People in today’s society fear that because of this, Shakespeare could no longer be considered a great writer. Somehow people were surprised by this, that a guy who lived in England in the 1500’s was both sexist and racist.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For me I would have to say the purpose of the writing is the hardest thing to do. Purpose on a paper is what the writing is meant to do, if the writing is intended to be a summary then the paper should be strictly about what the summary of something is. On the other hand, if you have a personal narrative, and you must write about your life then the writing should include opinions and first person styles. Purpose for writing can be for anything it could be a letter to the governor or the government, a complaint letter or a thank you letter it can be a professional letter or just a letter to a friend. Point is that there is always going to be an audience, a genera or purpose for writing you just must know wat those things are and what style of writing you must use.…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If a reader does not follow closely what the author is talking about, one would most likely get lost, and have to reread. The use of arrows in this selection seems to be how the author transitions. He has an average of one paragraph per arrow. Maybe this is his way of transitioning from thought to thought. Either way, he is breaking the frame.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mustapha Mond demonstrates his unorthodoxy when he is forced to punish Bernard and his friends for their actions even though he himself owns illegal books for his own personal pleasure. Mustapha was once in Bernard’s shoes and was an unorthodox Alpha when he was recruited to become the next World Controller. A new World Controller isn’t needed so Marx will be sent to an island with more unorthodox people. Mond says, “You’ve got to choose between happiness and what people used to call fine art. We’ve sacrificed the fine art.” (Huxley 226).…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Except for three men by the names of Casca, Cassius, and Brutus. They gets even angrier when they found out the news that their very own “fiend”, Julius Caesar, was going to be crowned king of Rome. They didn 't like that at all, so they started thinking of ways to stop Caesar from becoming King. They come up with the idea of writing a bunch of letters bragging on someone else so that the people of Rome might pick the person that they are bragging on, rather than Julius Caesar. The men loathe Caesar so much to the point that they talked about taking their own life to spare them from having Caesar as king.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays