The United Nations Security Council comprises of five great powers and ten rotating member states that make decisions on international affairs such as peace and security. In addition, United Nations General Assembly consists of 193 members of the UN and proposes resolutions, however those are generally meant to be advisory as oppose to binding. The General Assembly is also responsible for the UN’s finances and can authorize funds for peacekeeping missions. Although both organs play an important role for the UN, there are distinct differences that clearly outline their role and importance in the international system. As a result, the UN Security Council is more active in terms of creating international law because of its ability to establish
…show more content…
Furthermore, the Security Council also has ten nonpermanent members who are elected by the General Assembly for two year terms. Important resolutions require nine votes out of the 15 member states to pass, however if one of the five permanent members vetoes, then the resolution does not pass. Resolutions that are passed by the Security Council are “binding”, however its strengths lie on the states willingness to respect international law. Peacekeeping missions are also an important part for the Security Council, which grants the authorization to utilize peacekeeping forces for a period of three to six months that may be renewed on a constant basis. Additionally, the Security Council has “tremendous power to define the existence and nature of a security threat, to structure the response to such a threat, ands to enforce its decision though mandatory directives to UN members (such as to halt trade with an aggressor)” (216) As a consequence, the ability to impose sanctions towards aggressive states is a power tool that is exercised by the Security Council to ensure peace and security around the international …show more content…
For example, the Security Council can impose binding resolutions to all member states of the UN whereas the General Assembly’s resolutions are meant to be advisory. This is especially important when it comes to enforcement because states are more likely to follow international law if it has the backing of the Security Council, especially the P-5 members. Collective security is another crucial factor in separating the differences between the Security Council and the General Assembly. Accordingly, this has been used over the past several decades by the Security Council to authorize military interventions in places such as the Gulf War and against Afghanistan in
Furthermore, the Security Council also has ten nonpermanent members who are elected by the General Assembly for two year terms. Important resolutions require nine votes out of the 15 member states to pass, however if one of the five permanent members vetoes, then the resolution does not pass. Resolutions that are passed by the Security Council are “binding”, however its strengths lie on the states willingness to respect international law. Peacekeeping missions are also an important part for the Security Council, which grants the authorization to utilize peacekeeping forces for a period of three to six months that may be renewed on a constant basis. Additionally, the Security Council has “tremendous power to define the existence and nature of a security threat, to structure the response to such a threat, ands to enforce its decision though mandatory directives to UN members (such as to halt trade with an aggressor)” (216) As a consequence, the ability to impose sanctions towards aggressive states is a power tool that is exercised by the Security Council to ensure peace and security around the international …show more content…
For example, the Security Council can impose binding resolutions to all member states of the UN whereas the General Assembly’s resolutions are meant to be advisory. This is especially important when it comes to enforcement because states are more likely to follow international law if it has the backing of the Security Council, especially the P-5 members. Collective security is another crucial factor in separating the differences between the Security Council and the General Assembly. Accordingly, this has been used over the past several decades by the Security Council to authorize military interventions in places such as the Gulf War and against Afghanistan in