But in this case there is no such thing as a right or wrong decision. If stem cell research is completely cut off, then that would be infringing on the rights of an American citizen, thus making a decision that is unconstitutional. The whole reason of a president is to make decisions that will please the entire nation. And that is a difficult decision, but being president of one of the biggest superpowers in the world is not an easy task. Always when a decision is made one half of America is pleased, and the other side is infuriated. Sacrifices need to be made but putting the nation on the line must not be …show more content…
After all, he realized it would be infringing on the rights of the scientists who are attempting to make a breakthrough in the field of disease and better the future of America. Not just America but the whole world, a new age is upon us and it is time to embrace it. The leading causes of death in America are: Heart Disease: 611,105 Cancer: 584,841 Diabetes: 75,578 and Stroke: 128,978. Most of these can be cured by stem cell procedures. These numbers can be cut down drastically if new methods to obtaining stem cells are discovered through research in which the government is funding. Religion cannot be an excuse for this because not everyone is the same religion, not everyone is the same belief. It is infringing on the rights of the citizens of America therefore, it was in the wrong of George Bush to ban funding of stem cell research and in the right of Obama to lift this