and I think 15-20 years should be required to run for this position.” Theall believes her experience as a judge and lawyer will allow her keep her personal beliefs out of cases and solely make a ruling from the facts presented. “As a judge you learn very quickly that your personal opinions don’t matter,” she said. “Your opinions are solely based off the facts and evidence in front of you.”…
Although voters are looking for a judge that they can relate to and represent them the best, they are overlooking the educational background and credentials of those running. There is also the possibility of judges being elected primarily on their party affiliation alone and not on their platform or…
Magistrates Introduction Lay people (people who are not legally qualified) are used to make decisions in Magistrates’ Court and the Crown Court. There are around 25,000 lay Magistrates sitting as part time judges in the magistrates’ Courts. They sit to hear cases as a bench of two or three magistrates. A single lay Magistrates sitting on his or own has very limited power. There are also District Judges…
There can be no assumption that today's majority is “right” and the Amish or others like them are “wrong.” A way of life that is odd or even erratic but interferes with no right or interests of others is not to be condemned because it is different. Chief Justice Warren E. Burger Like Marshall, [Warren Burger] was an innovative, conservative chief justice with a profound sense of history and respect for the Constitution, fully conscious of the fundamental importance of an independent judiciary. Justice John Paul Stevens Warren Burger always was a person of strong beliefs and abundant energy. These attributes took him a long way, but they also created some opposition, as leadership does.…
At the beginning of the story we see the Justice of the Peace Court. Sarty is He's afraid that His is being accused of burning down someone else barn. Sarty wants to defend his father and lie and say his father and lie that didn’t burn the barn. The peace court and Mr. Harris know they are putting the young boy in a bad position, so they let him go. "This case is closed.…
Comparing lay magistracy to district judges, with lay magistracy you are being tried by your peers, they have local knowledge of the community. For example there was a case ‘Bowman v DPP (1991) where the defendant drove with excess alcohol at high speeds around a multi-storey car park shortly after midnight. Was the car park “a public place” within the meaning of the Act. The magistrate (using their local knowledge of the area and lived near the car park) with their knowledge that the barriers were raised at night so that motorists could use it freely, and convicted. However, in some cases it could be argued that that its better to be tried by a district judge as they have legal knowledge, just because the magistrates live within 15 miles of…
No matter which Justice on the Supreme Court one would pick, each have some sort of both bias and method when deciding their rulings. The overarching term for this is “judicial philosophy,” which ranges from conservatism to liberalism with moderates in-between. There are ramifications to wherever one sits on this scale, for instance, Justice Elena Kagan is liberal Justice, so it is likely that she will vote for something that matches up with her mindset, while a conservative Justice like Antonin Scalia will vote more conservative. When looking at this, its not that justices are only political actors, basically becoming American oligarchs, but the way the Justices see the world and for that matter, law differently then the other. Those who are…
Over half the tribal courts in Alaska have a tribal court system. The type of cases they can address are child related like, juvenile delinquency, juvenile status offences, adoption, child support enforcement, custody and protection. The courts also handle domestic violence, probate, and alcohol violations. Tribal counts cover environmental regulation, cultural protection, internal governmental disputes, property damage, property disputes, trespass, and misdemeanor offences. Lastly they have a say in animal control, and fish and game/marine mammal protection.…
The article, ‘Tactical Balancing: High Court Decision Making on Politically Crucial Cases,’ by Diana Kapiszewski, talks about 7 different approaches which judges use when deciding a case. One of these approaches is the Justices’ ideology. For this approach, whoever the Justice prefers for the policy and whichever side they fall on in the ideological spectrum will determine which side the Justice will lean towards in their decision making. The second tactical approach which Justices use is corporate/institutional interests. When justices make this approach, they will go towards toward the corporate or institution which they think will affect them the least.…
Judges, much like magistrates, preside over court cases. They are seen as the umpires of court cases, ensuring that the rules are followed and that a fair trial is carried out. Judges sit in intermediate and superior courts (District and Supreme Courts). The role of the judge is to adjudicate in cases: the judge makes decisions about points of law and gives instructions to the jury to make sure that they understand the proceedings and evidence presented. Another role in the case was the judge’s associate, this role is a confidential secretary to the judge and is a clerk of the court in which the judge is presiding.…
The type of court structure we have in the United States is a dual court system. This means that every state has its own judicial system, that’s separate from the federal system, which is the same for every state. The state court includes trial courts of Limited Jurisdiction, Trial Court of General Jurisdiction, Intermediate Courts of Appeals, and the Appellate Court for a last resort. The Federal Court System includes District COurts, Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the Supreme COurt of the United States.…
In this paper, I will be arguing that Canada’s judicial appointment process should be looked over carefully and revised. I’ll be arguing three main ideas throughout this paper, as well I will be giving some interest and some points in my introduction. The process for the judicial appointment is first going through the commissioner for federal judicial affairs and executive director and after that they check the expression of interest and eligibility and so on it goes to the provincial and territorial court judges after they approve and done with it, many judicial advisory committees come to play and review the “change of law” even more, and to finalize it they look at it and review it carefully before making it a new law. Looking at Canada’s…
| | | |No enquiry allowed into jury deliberations after verdict, even if juror | |Section 51 Criminal Justice & Public Order Act 1994 creates offence |alleges racial or any other type of bias or wrongdoing by the jury. | |to intimidate or threaten to harm a juror. | | |Prosecution and defence "challenges" correct the problems caused by |Jury vetting is against the principle of random selection. | |random selection.…
Over the years, judicial diversity has been an issue of concern for Wales and England. Reform initiatives and debates for judicial diversity are critical features of various common law jurisdictions. The country faces gender and ethnicity diversity as the major dimension of inclusiveness in the judicial system. Critics have raised general arguments in rationalizing judicial diversity as well as the essence of having judicial appointments and procedures adhering to the requirements of equal opportunity laws and equality. Diverse compunctions of the judiciary have higher capacitates of responsiveness to experiences and needs of different legal system subjects.…
If you go out and about within our country and you ask people if they knew very much about the United States court system, they will most likely tell you that they do not know very much about the court system unless they have been involved with the court system whether it be federal or state level. Most people do not realize that the court systems have three levels within them or that there is certain situation that will allow you to get to one level or the other. There is a whole lot of information that some people may not know. They may not know about judicial review and how it came about. Some people may not even know how justices decide the ruling of their cases.…