Bowman Vs Dp Case Study

Decent Essays
Comparing lay magistracy to district judges, with lay magistracy you are being tried by your peers, they have local knowledge of the community. For example there was a case ‘Bowman v DPP (1991) where the defendant drove with excess alcohol at high speeds around a multi-storey car park shortly after midnight. Was the car park “a public place” within the meaning of the Act. The magistrate (using their local knowledge of the area and lived near the car park) with their knowledge that the barriers were raised at night so that motorists could use it freely, and convicted. However, in some cases it could be argued that that its better to be tried by a district judge as they have legal knowledge, just because the magistrates live within 15 miles of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Lee Vs Hanley Case Study

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Attorneys who are sued for actions constituting a violation of their professional obligations can use the one year statute of limitations under CCP §340.6 as a defense. Tortious conduct such as conversion isn't subject to the 1 year statute of limitation. Lee v. Hanley I. The Trial Court In Lee v. Hanley,…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    R V Labaye Case Study

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This essay will discuss the case of R v. Labaye. A summary of the nature of the proceeding and the judges writing decision, facts, legal issues, the decision, judicial reasoning and a thorough analysis will be addressed in this essay. I prefer the reasoning of the majority decision as it is reasonable and ethical. The nature of the proceeding is an appeal heard from the Supreme Court of Canada.…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In additional to conflicting views due to diversity among the North and South, Stephan Douglas’ desire to develop unorganized territory, and disinterest in the controversy of slavery, lead to influential conflicts in the sectional crisis, including the Kansas-Nebraska Act and the Lecompton Constitution. These conflicts, and the additional uprising they caused further divided the country, leading the country towards sectionalism. At the time, senator of Illinois Stephan Douglas worked toward developing westward territories. Through the late 1840s and early 1850s Douglas aspired to develop and build a railroad on the remaining land from the Louisiana purchase (306). Douglas’ lack of investment in the issue of slavery lead to his support of…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of Roper versus Simmons, the question at hand is whether the execution of a human being who was17 years old when he committed a murder violated the Eight and Fourteenth Amendments pertaining to cruel and unusual punishment (Elrod and Ryder, 2014). These Amendments forbid the obligation of the death penalty for those who suffered from a mental disability and who were insane should be prohibited from a sentence of capital punishment (Elrod and Ryder, 2014). According to the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution, it was lawful to execute a juvenile delinquent who was 15 years older but younger than 18 when he committed a capital crime (Elrod and Ryder, 2014). Roper versus Simmons paved the way in the judicial…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Democratic societies like Canada and the United States follow the unwritten and underlying principle of “rule of law”. The rule of law ensure that a certain level of procedural justice are achieved in trials, as they provide the court with a basic grid of evaluation. However, such procedural processes were not respected in the Bryant-Milam trial, as the the two social categories of race and social class tarnished the processes of the trial, fostering impartial judicial proceedings and ultimately disallowing justice. The trials ability in achieving justice was deterred as occupational status and race contaminated and fostered impartiality amongst the jury, the witnesses and the provided evidence; three of the fundamental components of a judicial proceedings.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the United States, the court system judicial authority is shared between the levels of government. Today, the Texas Constitution lacks power in people, campaign contributions, lack of minority representation on the bench, perceptions of fairness, and lack of knowledge on the part of the voters. Due to lack of these powers, people distrust the changes that could give the government even more power. Thought the states in United States, the Texas judiciary is among the most complicated and confusing systems. Courts are expected by the country to act in nonpolitical ways, focus on the wishes of the electorate, focus on justice, and give the fair and right judgment for the citizens.…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “These courts have original and exclusive jurisdiction over violations of city ordinances” (“Trial Courts”). Municipal Courts often hear traffic cases, civil disputes, class “C” misdemeanor criminal cases with small fine as a punishment and other cases involving city ordinance violations. Each court has one judge, which can issue arrest and search warrants. Person can choose between the jury trial and the trial before the judge; retain an attorney or represent himself. Jury or judge renders a verdict of guilty or not guilty basing on evidences.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    On Thursday, November 12th, I visited the Fredericksburg General District Court of the 15th Judicial District of Virginia to observe cases beginning at 9:30 a.m. in Fredericksburg, Virginia. The Virginia General District Court is the lowest level of the Virginia court system and is the most common court citizens of Virginia have contact with. The General District Court is a limited jurisdiction trial court that conducts trials involving traffic infractions and other criminal misdemeanor offenses, hears civil cases involving amounts of under $25,000, and holds preliminary hearings in felony cases. They do not conduct jury trials and all cases are heard and decided by the judge. There are 32 judicial districts of the General District Court serving…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judges, much like magistrates, preside over court cases. They are seen as the umpires of court cases, ensuring that the rules are followed and that a fair trial is carried out. Judges sit in intermediate and superior courts (District and Supreme Courts). The role of the judge is to adjudicate in cases: the judge makes decisions about points of law and gives instructions to the jury to make sure that they understand the proceedings and evidence presented. Another role in the case was the judge’s associate, this role is a confidential secretary to the judge and is a clerk of the court in which the judge is presiding.…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Essay

    • 1073 Words
    • 4 Pages

    However, this means that there may also be a prodigious amount of room for mistake in convictions. Therefore, the jury system is not as effective as a bench trial due to it not being judged by a professional on the subject of law, the manner in which the court selects jurors is unfair, and the way that the jury is forced to decide can cause some poor judgment. Judges are given the powers they have because they are professionals on their subject matter; however, a jury is not quite the same. A jury trial is a trial that has twelve randomly selected citizens coming to a verdict instead of a judge.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    | | | |No enquiry allowed into jury deliberations after verdict, even if juror | |Section 51 Criminal Justice & Public Order Act 1994 creates offence |alleges racial or any other type of bias or wrongdoing by the jury. | |to intimidate or threaten to harm a juror. | | |Prosecution and defence "challenges" correct the problems caused by |Jury vetting is against the principle of random selection. | |random selection.…

    • 2129 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brothel Boy Case Study

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The prosecutors are considered to be the most influential actors within the courthouse, as they decide which case to prosecute, the cases to plea-bargain, and the case to try. The prosecutor may also influence the factors of setting bail and creating the sentence. In the United States Constitution, one’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel is granted as many defendants cannot afford to hire a lawyer, they are provided a public defender also known as the defense attorney. The defense attorneys encourage their clients to think about how the jury will assess them as guilty beyond reasonable doubt, therefore most will plead guilt. The judge plays a major authority role in the criminal justice system whether it is in state courts, or larger courts.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case: Katzenbach v. Grant 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46756 *; 2005 WL 1378976 Facts: The Plaintiffs, Katzenbach and Osuna filed a lawsuit against Defendant Grant over a film and book rights. Grant owns a website called “thenightexposed” (www.thenightexposed.net). The Plaintiffs claim that Grant caused problems with negotiations with Sony Pictures and the USA Network. Plaintiff further claims that Grant sent a letter calling Osuna book a fake and made other defamatory articulations about the Plaintiffs on his website.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If you go out and about within our country and you ask people if they knew very much about the United States court system, they will most likely tell you that they do not know very much about the court system unless they have been involved with the court system whether it be federal or state level. Most people do not realize that the court systems have three levels within them or that there is certain situation that will allow you to get to one level or the other. There is a whole lot of information that some people may not know. They may not know about judicial review and how it came about. Some people may not even know how justices decide the ruling of their cases.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The role of Judges in our court system is one of the most important roles within our relative communities, they are the main point of interpretation when it comes to the law. Be it civil or criminal, they assess the evidence, and hopefully have an unbiased mind towards the pursuit of justice. Despite legislature being made through Parliament, Judges are able to teach the people through the means of precedent what laws actually mean. They help the general public to know to what extent they are abiding by the law and punishable offences under the law. The question that is being asked is whether or not Judges have the right to be creative in their rulings, or should they simply apply the law just the way it is?…

    • 1112 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays