The Dalai Lama Analysis

Improved Essays
What is the Purpose of Life? Throughout all of human history, man has been able to advance significantly in terms of technology and ideology. These advancements, along with our innate ability to utilize rational thought, were the tools we used to evolve. This evolution to the modern human was made possible by using technology to gain knowledge of things that were previously beyond our comprehension. Ideally, the more we learn, the more we know. However, when it comes to the unknown, we tend to look for answers that can be both proven and explained in a way we can comprehend. This is why it is common for people turn to science to answer many questions we encounter in our lives. However, the major flaw with science comes from the fact that it …show more content…
He acknowledged the fact that human beings in general are dominated by anger. But as a counter he points out everyone should learn how to gain control of their anger and hatred. He also clarifies that he does not mean to let are anger fuel us when making decisions. According to the Dalai Lama, “The energy anger gives us is blind energy because it effects our rationality” (pg38). His solution to controlling anger was working on reasoning and patience. He uses his theory on anger to back his claim that humans are interdependent by stating that humans need both bad experiences and bad people in order to practice and develop their reasoning and patience skills. Lastly, he explains that there is a difference between attachment and actual affection. Growing attached to a significant other or family member is not the same as loving them. He claims that only true affection will create genuine …show more content…
However, I believed he supported his arguments thoroughly. While analyzing the Dalai Lama’s theory I was thinking about Ilham Dilman’s Life and Meaning. Ilham’s comparison of the questions “Has life any meaning?” and “Has my life any meaning?”, made me want to disagree with the Dalai Lama. The idea that the purpose of life in general is to be happy is acceptable to me. However, the idea that the only function my life serves is to find inner happiness through interactions with others makes seems to be a waste of time. I would like to believe the purpose of humanity is more than to simply make

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Moreover, people need to learn how to deal with criticism as not all comments are good for them. The first thing when listening to comments is that people have to be calm and analyze criticism about them. If comments are used to figure out their mistakes and some improvements, they should take advantages of those to improve themselves. But when the criticisms try to attack people and put them down, they do not need to be angry or depressed, just ignore it. In addition, the language is very important, people need to be careful in word choices as their purpose is to discuss together to find solution but not to make…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Earthly desires are only temporary. It only make up a part of the true happiness we are looking for. Contentment, I believe, is what would give us true happiness. We should be contented on what we have. I’m not saying that we are not allowed to achieve for something more but we must make sure that what we are striving is something what we need, not what we want.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, how are you happy without knowing you are happy? If the pursuit of happiness is not real then what do you do with your life? Everyone who thought happiness was a good thing, but it only betrayed you. Why are people searching for the meaning of happiness it is like asking what is the meaning of life, but there is no answer, so what is the point of living? Also when you accept your happiness then what do you do now doesn’t that defeat the purpose of living and you would just be satisfied with…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Though taking the theistic approach, is not universal; some may say that helping others is what makes a life meaningful, is this not a means of happiness? There is no difference between desiring a spiritual value or materialistic goods, as both are external to the one desiring them. Swenson argues against choosing material goods, as these are finite and only a few can achieve. He suggests seeking fulfillment of the moral consciousness, therefore, every human can achieve happiness. Though the desire of happiness is infinite and some non-spiritual values are also infinite, such as the satisfaction one experiences when helping others or loving a significant other, or enjoying the beauty of nature.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    While it is possible some stability can lead to happiness, the “stability” to which they refer in the story is a false stability, one that is fabricated by those who claim to know what is best for everyone. A person should have the right to choose his or her course of action and should not be forced into a certain way of living by the government or any higher power.…

    • 1955 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are more cases regarding those whose desires do not coincide with their self-interest and these contradict the theory of psychological egoism. In cases where a psychological egoists would claim that everyone would expect even just a little bit of benefit, does not take into account pessimistic people or people who know that the action will not benefit them at all (Shafer-Landau, 2015). Using sincere love as an example, the claim that our actions are motivated our strongest desire would not hold up because our self-interested desires would not be our priority; rather, you would want the other person to be happy even if it caused you pain (Jorati, 2014). There are times that people go after their own self-interest, however if they did it all the time, there would be no sense of morality. Even Shafer Landau (2015) states “If all we can do is look out for Number One, then there is little point in demanding we do otherwise.” (pg.104).…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Autonomy Vs Hedonism

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Still, we need only imagine a life without autonomy to see what a tragedy it would be. Saying this we can make another argument against Hedonism. The Argument from Autonomy: “If hedonism is true, then autonomy contributes to a good life only insofar as it makes us happy. Autonomy sometimes directly contributes to a good life, even when it fails to makes us happy. Therefore, hedonism is false.” (Shafer-Landau, 2018, p. 39) For example, what would you choose, a good life where you are happy taking your own decisions, even where you can fail in them, or a perfect life where there’s going to be someone always telling you what to do, what to eat, how to move, where to go?…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethical Egoism’s duty to is look out for yourself only, granting moral obligation only to favorites and special treatments for one person. In contrast to utilitarianism; Ethical Egoism’s function does not maximize the welfare of others in reach and treating everyone and self with equal regard. Furthermore, Ethical Egoism betrays other theories due to the fact of how selfish it is compared to the other philosophical schemes. This theory rose to my attention as it made me contemplate how it is the time to focus on myself only and to consider the ones I deem are important to me. 2016 is the year of self-love, to put yourself first before others.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dalai Lama Case Study

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Egoism is an ethical theory which is centered on the idea that our actions should be motivated only by the idea to benefit ourselves, while the Dalai Lama’s ethical perspective is centered on the idea that our actions should be motivated towards benefiting ourselves and everyone else around us. Egoism might lead to happiness, but based on the Dalai Lama’s definition, this happiness is not genuine since it is not inner happiness, and also because the people around us do not benefit from it, while Dalai’s ethical perspective leads to genuine happiness since this happiness is motivated by the need to benefit others. These two ethical theories are similar when it comes to their ideas about doing certain actions. For example; truth-telling, generosity, non-maleficence are all acts that egoism and the Dalai Lama’s ethical perspective do not accept because they have a negative impact. Egoism might not accept these behaviours because they have self-implication while Dalai Lama’s ethical perspective does not approve for the reasons that it will impact us and the people around us.…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anger is just an external expression of our internal feelings like fear, frustration and hurt. We need to have a better understanding of our ‘anger’. Many a times without understanding the basics behind anger, we tend to express it and later regret for it. What is the way, by which we can understand our anger?. To understand our anger, we need to follow ABCD model or the Responsibility Empowering Action Method.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics