Pseudoscience Vs Knowledge

Improved Essays
As humans we have several capacities that other species in the animal kingdom do not have. Our brain can reason and process information like no other animals can do, in fact we are capable to judge and make our own conclusions. Unfortunately, not every thought that crosses our minds is accurate; this has led to stablish parameters between what is reliable and what is not. Over the past decades, scientists have avoided to spread information that is not proven. They have used the scientific method to analyze and disseminate facts that we can rely on. However, there are more facts spread than science can proof. We have a lot of questions that need to be answered and for science it may take time. That’s where pseudoscience starts threatening science, …show more content…
Research and Analysis takes time and it requires a given documentation. “Though the process of scientific discovery is much more complicated, the basic goal of science is no different from the acquisition of everyday beliefs: we seek knowledge and try to weed out falsehood” (Blancke, Boudry, and M. Pigliucci). On the other hand, pseudoscience can provide answers in the means of no time without requiring any data or experimental analysis, which could take years. Even if the facts aren’t reliable is an approximation of reality. A good example of this is one of the most controversial topics of our civilization; is there extraterrestrial life on other planets? Pseudoscience can answer that question in the matter of no time and without any research, while science have taken years trying to proof that there is life in other planets and have not yet give us and …show more content…
A good example is the theory that the world was going to end in 2012 according to the Maya’s calendar; this rumor affected the behavior and decisions of many individuals who believe that the world was going to end. Many people sold their houses, went on vacation and quit their jobs, because of this skeptic theory. According to scientists like Christopher Keating ,professor of physics at the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, this so called doomsday only ended up scaring people and producing panic; in his own words “people who have been misled by those who have manipulated ancient legends… can, and will, make irrational decisions.". Imagine yourself shouting to your boss you won’t receive any more orders and that you are going to quit your job. A month later after new year you find yourself unemployed and penniless because you spend all you had and quit your job, that’s when you start asking yourself why the world didn’t end? The good news is that you still alive, the bad one is that you shouldn’t have quit your job based in pseudoscience. Now, if a meteorite is in the trajectory of the earth and scientists prognosticated that it will crash our planet in one month, start packing up and planning that trip that you never made because science is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Science is capable of explaining and verifying many things, but it cannot explain or verify everything. The word “science” comes from the Latin word “scientia” which means “knowledge”. Science is the knowledge and study of facts in the natural world and the process of experimenting and observing the facts in order to draw generalized conclusions. Science is made up of the knowledge revealed to and discovered by mankind. This is why science cannot prove everything, because we do not know everything; scientist do not have all the answers they are simply guessing.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If someone tells a scientist that “it’s just a theory” then he would be offended because a theory is backed up by so many different experiments. A lot of effort goes into making theories. If someone does not accept a theory, it is almost like all of the scientist’s work was for nothing. Theories explain laws. A hypothesis is not an “educated guess”.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “It’s part of historical consciousness to learn the same thing: that there is no “correct” interpretation of the past, but that the act of interpreting is itself a vicarious enlargement of experience from which you can benefit” (Gaddis, 10). Even though there is no single truth that is agreed on, one can learn from the experiences and knowledge that comes from attempting to find the truth. Another important difference that Gaddis writes about is that some natural scientists are able to repeat their experiments in order to determine the truth and what is happening, but historians do not have the ability to do that. He writes, “we cannot relive, retrieve, or rerun it as we might some laboratory experiment or computer simulation” (Gaddis, 3). He tells his readers that historians can only study something that has already happened, so they lack the ability of scientists to be able to repeat these events in order to further their study of them.…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Students would be presented arguments in favor of intelligent design in the universe, but in scientific rather than religious language. (Phy-Olsen 16) With this view on evolution it is less likely to offend many people yet still gives other possibilities to the creation story. Intelligent design states that the different processes involved in living organisms are so complex and rely greatly on simultaneous actions, therefore the likelihood of those happening solely on their own is impossible (Institute of Medicine 40). “Because nobody was present at Creation, its events are impossible to verify […]” (Phy-Olsen 62). We may never truly know how we were created or why we evolved into the beings that we are today, but the kids of this world should be introduced to all possibilities of the evolution story.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Billy Graham Technology

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Scientists have discovered much about the size, majesty and precision of the universe, but they cannot discover the way to peace and 3) “Technology cannot solve the problem of death.” One of the greatest surprises in our lives is the brevity of life, in which mankind does not possess the power over. No one knows the day nor the hour when our spirit shall leave our earthly body, except for…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is a lack on evidence of the fossil’s transitional forms, which are the major study material of the human evolution`s history. As a consequence, the human origin is not for sure from the apes. The new archeological discoveries often reject one part of a theory and form new hypothesis. The frequent changes make it incredible for many people. In addition to that, there are many other questions with no answer.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is what most people tend to assume, a scientist discovered a theory to explain a phenomenon, so surely it is correct. However, this is not always the case. In today’s time, of course we regard all our current popular theories as true, but time does tend to take a toll on this. The history of science provides us with countless examples of “scientific theories which were empirically successful in their day but later turned out to be false,” such as Earth-centered universe beliefs (Okasha 60). We won’t be around to know if our beliefs are the way things really are, and we can never know for sure what the future will discover.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Geo Engineering Problems

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Humanity has always searched for solutions to problems that have challenged societies for centuries. The development of science and the scientific method has given humans the ability to explore and change the environment in which humans live. However, with the emergence of geo-engineering the unknown variables can present more problems than solutions. It is understandable that humans are concerned with the radical way in which the world’s climate is changing; what is not understandable is the mentality that we should treat the whole planet as a guinea pig and start performing experiments without certainty of what the results would be. The geo-engineering technology consists not on solving the methods and procedures in which corporations mass-produce…

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They developed a curiosity to prove things for themselves, a notion that is still present today. Even today we still maintain a healthy skepticism of new information and can use the tested experiments of past scientists, or develop our own tests to confirm this new information. We stand on the shoulders of giants, because those giants broke the mold and applied mathematics to the universe around…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay Of Empiricism

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many people might disagree with this, but they need to remember that most things in science are not proven. Science is basically a collection of theories that help us better understand the world. Einstein’s theory of general relativity cannot be proven for sure, but we take it as a fact. Psychology is also a group of theories that psychologists put together after their own studies of the human mind. It cannot be proven for sure like many other science theories, but it is always open to be disproved as time goes on and technology advances.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays