Pseudoscience Vs Knowledge

Improved Essays
As humans we have several capacities that other species in the animal kingdom do not have. Our brain can reason and process information like no other animals can do, in fact we are capable to judge and make our own conclusions. Unfortunately, not every thought that crosses our minds is accurate; this has led to stablish parameters between what is reliable and what is not. Over the past decades, scientists have avoided to spread information that is not proven. They have used the scientific method to analyze and disseminate facts that we can rely on. However, there are more facts spread than science can proof. We have a lot of questions that need to be answered and for science it may take time. That’s where pseudoscience starts threatening science, …show more content…
Research and Analysis takes time and it requires a given documentation. “Though the process of scientific discovery is much more complicated, the basic goal of science is no different from the acquisition of everyday beliefs: we seek knowledge and try to weed out falsehood” (Blancke, Boudry, and M. Pigliucci). On the other hand, pseudoscience can provide answers in the means of no time without requiring any data or experimental analysis, which could take years. Even if the facts aren’t reliable is an approximation of reality. A good example of this is one of the most controversial topics of our civilization; is there extraterrestrial life on other planets? Pseudoscience can answer that question in the matter of no time and without any research, while science have taken years trying to proof that there is life in other planets and have not yet give us and …show more content…
A good example is the theory that the world was going to end in 2012 according to the Maya’s calendar; this rumor affected the behavior and decisions of many individuals who believe that the world was going to end. Many people sold their houses, went on vacation and quit their jobs, because of this skeptic theory. According to scientists like Christopher Keating ,professor of physics at the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, this so called doomsday only ended up scaring people and producing panic; in his own words “people who have been misled by those who have manipulated ancient legends… can, and will, make irrational decisions.". Imagine yourself shouting to your boss you won’t receive any more orders and that you are going to quit your job. A month later after new year you find yourself unemployed and penniless because you spend all you had and quit your job, that’s when you start asking yourself why the world didn’t end? The good news is that you still alive, the bad one is that you shouldn’t have quit your job based in pseudoscience. Now, if a meteorite is in the trajectory of the earth and scientists prognosticated that it will crash our planet in one month, start packing up and planning that trip that you never made because science is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    David Skorton, in the article “Why Scientists Should Embrace Liberal Arts”, argues that scientists must supplement their science and engineering education with a study of the humanities to effectively inform the populous. Through the humanities, Skorton believes scientists can develop a better understanding of the human conditions, thus better emotionally connecting with people lacking a scientific background. Skorton’s article contributes a perspective towards solving a larger problem of the drift between the scientific community and the general public’s perception of scientific truth, particularly the scientific truths that inform politically charged debates. Skorton effectively aggrandizes the scientific community as potential saviors of…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Additionally, it is important that people understands that it is healthy to ask questions and raise concerns, but people need to learn that not every concern is valid. Skepticism is needed in a free society, and science can often only be conducted in a free society, but this does not mean we shouldn’t believe what the scientific community discovers about the world around us. Thus, the real solution is a free educated society. Thus, I would argue that the solution is not just making science “popular” by integrating into pop culture, but instead the solution is creating a better education systems in…

    • 1111 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We as humans tend to have the belief that our opinions are based on conclusions that resulted from completely rational, objective reasoning. We think that we have considered all evidence equally before arriving at a conclusion, and if we were to be presented with enough evidence opposing it, we would be quick to correct ourselves. However, people have again and again proved that this is not how we form our opinions. In reality, we have the tendency to ignore information that challenges our established beliefs, choosing to pay a disproportionate amount of our attention to information that confirms our beliefs.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Logos, What the World Needs More of Science is based in logos. Research and experiments are attempts to establish facts, and to draw correct conclusions based on those facts. While all of science is based on this, I am a personal trainer, so I’m most familiar with the health sciences and research. When discussing health, it would seem obvious that it should be a factual process. If I do A, B will happen.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Never have humans had such abundance of information, easily accessible at the touch of a finger. Philosophers, doctors and scientists throughout history have labored their entire lives to study the science of earth, space and life on our planet. Now, with the amazing technological advances we’ve experienced in the last several decades, so many monumental discoveries have shed light on these fields, answering many questions and creating many more. The question now facing many of us in our quest for knowledge is what information is credible. What makes for “good science”?…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Exploring the Unknown Science is one that is often thought of as a methodical process. Students are taught to follow a set group of rules to achieve a predictable result. But, once these students are actually engaged in the reality of the scientific world, they find out that scientific research is far more complex and adventurous expanding beyond this simple ruleset they are presented with They learn that science embraces the risk of being wrong and pushes its pursuer to explore knowledge that had previously never been explored. Scientists are expected to grasp knowledge that no one had ever before been presented with, making the field of scientific research one filled with risk and unpredictability. In the excerpt from The Great Influenza,…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The question expressed in this discussion is why, and to understand the answer to this we have to delve further into the conversation. In an effort to get to the root of Firestein’s point we should look into some key aspects. The points include ignorance, science, and dangers. Ignorance First, we see that ignorance is a prevalent issue with regards to the chapter.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Science to me is all about discoveries. If you aren't proving anything or gaining knowledge from what you a doing, it's my opinion that it truly isn't…

    • 89 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    In recent years, the outcry of people against genetically modified food, or GM food, has become increasingly prominent in both commercial and governmental practices. GM foods have a negative connotation; people think that eating something that has been modified is going to poison their body. Not only that, but most of the American public believes that in doing this, humans are playing god, and have gone too far. However, none of this is true. So far, none of the GM food currently on the market has any ill-effects on humans.…

    • 2000 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    More evidence was found once scientist did experiments such as epidemiology, animal testing, and chemical…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Keith E. Stanovich, the author of “How to Think Straight About Psychology,” explains different aspects of psychology to his readers in the first chapter of his book. He starts off by stating how Sigmund Freud is a fraud when it comes to psychology. Although Freud’s work in psychology is so little, he is the reason why many people misunderstand psychology. Then the chapter begins to talk about how psychology is composed of different topics and studies, and when there are many different topics it is difficult to link all of the topics into one. When psychology is often discussed, many people do not consider it a science.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The demarcation problem between science and pseudoscience is one of the Gordian knot problems in the field of philosophy of science. Several proposals have been made in this regard. Karl Popper proposes a ‘falsification principle’ that aims to test the scientific status of a theory. Kuhn has brought forward a claim against this principle that it is only applicable to occasional revolutionary parts rather than the most part of science. However, another attempt has been made by Lakatos in which a progressive research program draws the distinction between science and pseudoscience.…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These can lead to the media indirectly portraying a loss in credibility to the information presented by scientist. Also explained on page 124, “If you look at how the media treats scientific discoveries….[They’ll say] ‘here’s this thing that’s been discovered,’ not the process of how we figured it out... If you don’t help people understand what those processes are...now they can go onto the web and dial up an alternate answer” (Segal). This kind of portrayal by the media ruins the credibility of science and lead the public no…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Though science has overcome many explorations that impact our world and society, it does include some limitations that are regulated. For example , money plays a huge role for budgeting all of the experiments that allow scientist to gather more information that could possibly be used for future inventions or solutions. The expenses going towards NASA’s “Mars 2020 Mission” are regulated by the President, who he has proposed $17.46 billion for the year of 2015. With that said, the incredible amount of money that is being funded by Obama each year for NASA is ,somewhat, a huge part of what the future holds. American innovation rest on the investments we make today.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    You can look around and find things that are there; a pencil, a wall, a tree. You can find things that you don’t even see; air, space, feelings. These are all things that are considered under the umbrella term of “science”. It takes specialists and fields under the term “science” to even begin to understand any of these things, as each is equally complex. These people…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays