Pros And Cons Of Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor

Good Essays
Reid Farmer
Mr P.
Fluoride Thorium Reactor
27 April 2016
Fluoride Thorium Reactors
The liquid fluoride thorium reactor is a supply of nuclear fuel in the form of a molten salt mixture. A Molten Salt Reactors, such as Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor produces energy using a liquid nuclear fuel, not a solid fuel. MSRs also use a coolant that remains liquid at atmospheric pressure.
LFTRs are designed to convert Thorium, an inexpensive and abundant material, into Uranium-233 which can then undergo nuclear fission. Other types of MSR can use spent uranium, depleted uranium, or plutonium, eliminating nuclear waste from solid-fueled reactors. Most safety concerns of LWRs are from using water coolant; LFTR is a molten salt reactor (uses special salt
…show more content…
The LFTR is inherently far safer than conventional light water reactors. There is an abundant fuel source (thorium). It is chemically stable. There’s very small amounts of low level radioactive waste. It is potentially much easier to manage. The concentrated energy source requires far less land than solar energy. The cons of using a LFTR: Fission product processing greatly complicated by the presence of Thorium. Higher neutron leakage. Weakly positive temperature coefficient, can be fixed but at large cost. Pa removal needed unless both thorium and 233U loading increased substantially. Thorium is a non renewable material. It still produces waste, but it’s far less than uranium. It’s quite different than our current technology. It competes with renewables for investment dollars.

Why we don’t use them
…show more content…
It is generally considered inherently safer, cleaner and more economically viable than conventional reactors, but was not chosen by DOE as the technology of choice because it did not produce weapon grade material as a byproduct, something DOE was looking for at the time. That would be considered an advantage today. LFTR reactor cores are not pressurized. Any increase in temperature results in a reduction in power, thus eliminating the problematic runaway meltdown scenario. If the fluid should get too hot, a salt plug at the bottom of the tank simply melts dumping the entire mess into a storage vessel directly below the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    However, presently thorium is not economically viable as global uranium prices are much lower, but for a country like India with vast resources of thorium compared to negligible uranium resources, this seems as an effective option. To sum up, the Thorium programme being pursued by India can be instrumental in ending the nation’s energy woes and also showing the world a path towards safe, greener and efficient energy production from atomic…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nuclear Reactors

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. Introduction Most nuclear power plants/reactors work in quite a similar way. The power/energy released by the reaction of continuous fission of the atoms (this process is call nuclear fission) from the fuel (this is achieved by using radioactive elements) is use create heat for liquid to turn into steam. This steam is then used to drive the turbines in the power plant, which produce electricity. (World Nuclear Association, 2015) The nuclear power plants on average now have about 33% efficiency to using heat/steam in the power plant and providing 10.9% of the world’s electricity in 2012.…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Why nuclear power is the clear choice for power generation. Nuclear power is one of the most efficient and safest forms of power generation. The construction costs of building a nuclear power plant are high, however its operating costs are cheap. The price of uranium is cheap to transport however, it is rare and must be transported to countries that do not have any. Even though uranium is rare and it is hard for developing countries to build a nuclear reactor and purchase uranium, nuclear power is the clear choice in power generation because it is one of the most efficient and cheapest ways to generate power, and nuclear power is much safer and more efficient than fossil fuels.…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    So here we have an natural advantage of nuclear energy. Along with as per the reports, it has been calculated that the emission of the greenhouse gases has been reduced due to the usage of the nuclear power. So thrifting on nuclear energy is all around giving benefits to our environment. The thrust area of spending on nuclear gases also results into the least impact on our atmospheres as it does not release any hazardous gases like carbon dioxide, methane etc. which has resulted in the depletion of ozone layer in the atmosphere.But the fight here we have is to produce nuclear energy we have to extract uranium which has been the clean process since ages.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    We decided to choose uranium as the representative to finish this risk assessment since it is one of the most important chemical for nuclear power plant to create energy. 2) Chemical of Concern (Uranium) From the toxicological profile, which came from the Division of Toxicology and Human Health Sciences (DTHHS), we receive a clear idea about the uranium. When we talk about the chemical of the concerns, there are five factors associate with the chemicals. • Toxicity The health effects of natural and depleted Uranium comes from direct chemical interaction rather than the radiation. • Quantity A fingertip size Uranium pellet can provide 17,000 cubic feet of natural gas, 1,780 pounds of coal and 149 gallons of oil.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The use of renewable energy can lessen the dependency on import of fossil fuel from other countries and stimulate the development of new and most efficient technologies; however, there is some disadvantages in unlimited sources. The installation and maintenance prices are higher than non-renewable. Eolic energy demand a large space, and make too much noise; hydroelectric usually demands a deforestation, and biomass produces greenhouse gases (Shah, 2011). There are many advantages of using non-renewable energy. This kind has a high efficiency, is easy to transport, and is the cheapest way to produce energy; nonetheless, this type is only found in some places on the earth and can cause a big disaster, like the Fukushima nuclear disaster.…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Sander Lush Proodian Chemistry P.4 Nuclear Sustainability Atoms are tiny particles that make up every object in the universe. Nuclear energy is the “life force” in the nucleus of an atom. There is powerful energy present in the bonds that hold the nucleus together, and this “nuclear energy” can be used to make electricity; however, that energy must first be released from atoms through nuclear fission. In a nuclear power plant, nuclear fission – the process of splitting highly-reactive atoms to form smaller atoms to release high amounts of energy -- occurs in uranium to heat water into pressurized steam, which then drives turbine generators to produce electricity. Approximately 100 nuclear power plants reside all across our country, as…

    • 2141 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It is found in the Earth’s crust and can be found in small amounts in rocks and soil. Thorium is far more chemically stable and has limited radioactive debris compared to Uranium making it safer and environmentally friendly.Thorium has little negative effects on the environment as well as health concerns. World production of Thorium would exceed 30,000 tonnes per year. This would lead to an increase of Thorium in the environment because of releases, purposely or accidentally, released into the air.People have always been exposed to Thorium through air, food, and water because it is a natural element that is found nearly everywhere on Earth, so they can easily be ignored. Uncontrolled and dangerous levels of Thorium can be disposed in hazardous waste sites with proper procedures, keeping citizens unexposed.There are many uses for Nuclear Energy Three Of The Most Common Are is creating electricity.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nuclear Energy Impact

    • 1732 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Nuclear fuels derived from plutonium-239 and uranium-235 contains numerous carcinogenic radionuclide isotopes. Some of these isotopes include iodine-131, strontium-90, and caesium-137 (Imura, 19). Furthermore, it also comprises of some transuranic elements and other isotopes from plutonium. Some of these long-lived radioactive materials have a profound effect on humans and the environment if left unprotected. They are supposed to be stored far from humans for a very long period before being disposed of.…

    • 1732 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To begin with, nuclear energy has several major advantages. Not only a large amount of energy can be produced with only a tiny amount of energy input to the power generator, but the maintenance cost is low also. Moreover, unlike fossil fuel, it will not cause serious air pollution. However, after the two serious nuclear…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays