First Principle Of Justice Rawls Essay

The original position plays an important role to lead Rawls’s two principles of justice: first, each person has a claim to a fully adequate scheme of equal basic liberties, compatible with the same scheme of liberties for all (JF, 13), and second, they are to be attached to offices and positions open to all under conditions of fair equality opportunity, furthermore, they are to be to the greatest benefit of the least-advantaged members of society. (JF, 13) Moreover, Rawls asserts the priority of his first principle exceeds his second principle. He, therefore, emphasizes his first principle in the Theory of Justice. Why is his first principle important? To solve this question, in this paper, I will discuss how Rawls argues that parties in the …show more content…
The basic liberty, such as political liberty and freedom of association, freedom of thought and liberty of conscience, and freedom from arbitrary arrest, is necessary for all individuals to secure fundamental freedom and equality. On the other hand, with the principle of utility, it is not guaranteed and rejected depending on a situation. Moreover, all conditions for the Maximin rule are satisfied by the first principle of justice. In the society of the first principle, even the least advantaged person also has basic liberties; in other words, even if a person was in the worst situation, one has a least well off, the society is an acceptable. Besides, in the society of utilitarianism, it is possible that some persons’ rights and liberties are restricted or rejected for the total benefit of the entire society. On the other hand, in the society of the first principle, the rights and freedom are guaranteed equally. The worst outcome in the society of utilitarianism, therefore, is worth than the one in the society of the first principle. Then, the society of first principle satisfies the second and third conditions for the Maximin