Direct Effect In European Union Law

Superior Essays
The principle of direct effect in EU law stems from the formation of the European Union and its creation of overarching rules amongst its member states. These overarching rules are created in competence by the member states in order to achieve ‘…objectives that they have in common.’ In order to execute these common objectives, the principle of direct effect holds each member state accountable for the laws decided as a collective through the implementation of the European Court of Justice against member states.

Various articles in the Treaty on European Union emphasize the idea of the member states acting as a collective unit for the betterment of the European Community and the structure of the relationship between the union and its member states. However, the exact implementation of laws decided as a collective union and the consequences of not implementing European law on a national level is not explicitly stated in the treaties regarding the establishment and functioning of the European Union. The principle of direct effect rather evolved from individual circumstances where individuals or organizations implemented European Union law on a national level.

The judgement by the European Court of Justice on the Algemene Transporten Expeditie Onderneming van Gend en Loos v Nederlandse Administratie der Belastingen was one of the first steps in the
…show more content…
However, like the issue of import tariffs in the Van Gend en Loos case, the legal implementation of the protection of these rights across all member states is not explicitly stated in the treaties. Therefore, cases like Reyners v Belgium have helped establish the legal obligations of member states regarding the individual rights stated in various

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The order finds its foundation in the judicially innovative response to Mareva Compania Naviera SA v International Bulk Carriers SA, wherein the judiciary sought to put a stop to defeat claims by disposing of assets through increasingly sophisticated and complicated schemes. In Australia, the jurisdiction to grant the order is found in the inherent power of the court to prevent frustration of abuse of process, in statutory provisions including s 23 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), and in equivalent state legislation. However, it ought to be noted that the power of the court under the Federal Court of Australia Act does not extend to the granting of a Mareva Order where it is intended to support pecuniary penalty orders.…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United Kingdom is referred to having an unwritten constitution, but that is not strictly true. This may not refer in one single text, such as Germany or USA, but large parts are written down with much of it in the laws passed in parliament, these are called constitutional statue. According to Lord Justice Laws in the case Thoburn v Sunderland City Council this is an act witch either the conditions the legal relationship between the individual and the state in some way or enlarges or diminishes the scope of fundamental constitutional rights. Examples of constitutional statue are; Magna Carta 1297 , The Bill Of Rights 1689 and The Human Rights Act 1998 . Parliament sovereignty is one the core principles in the United Kingdom constitution.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This co-decision process is between the Council of the European Union and the European…

    • 1009 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mcgoeown Case Study

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The decision of this case heightens the application of precedent and the interpretation of the status. This case note will evaluate the decision of this case and the doctrine of precedent. Ⅱ THE…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An important aspect of this case, is that Judge Kaufman identified and considered that the act’s application is qualified by due process requirements. It concluded that in terms of personal jurisdiction, states are considered “persons” under the due process clause . With this determination, when there is a suit under the FSIA, courts will have to find minimum contacts of the foreign state with the US territory in order to establish personal jurisdiction . This was later, highly criticized by jurists and eventually overruled.…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Child Labor

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The problem here is, the doctrine of comity which states the courts of one country should refrain from deciding cases invloving acts from another country. The G20 countries can do their part to uphold their laws, example making sure those who commit crimes against humanity are prosecuted to the full extent 4) Have we learned anything since the Holocaust? The Holocaust shows us how power is given to the wrong peoples with ideological belief, laced with evil intention when that goes unchecked what the hows us how power is given to the wrong peoples with ideological belief, laced with evil intention when that goes unchecked what the outcome will be. Have we learned, i don't believe we have if we tally the about of people being killed around the world based on ideological beliefs we might be close to the…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in the United States can be a quite confusing and complex matter. To begin with, every judgment not from the state in which enforcement is sought, is considered a “foreign judgment” regardless of whether the judgment is from another state within the United States or a foreign country. Luckily for foreign judgments from sister states, the Full Faith and Credit Clause of Article IV, Section 1 of the United States Constitution applies. Judgment creditors for foreign country judgments, however, are not so lucky because they cannot benefit from the Full Faith and Credit Clause.…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the recent years, across the United States, suggestions/requests have been introduced by representatives of the civil society, legislators & governors to limit the role of politics in the selection of state judges. These actions were motivated by the recognition that an independent judiciary is crucial for the maintenance of public confidence in the bench. The judicial system however remains imperfect. While some states chose to appoint their judges, as a way to preserve the independence of the bench, most surprisingly chose to elect their judges.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Emi's Character Analysis

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In other words, the rights to free movement of goods,…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Prisoner Communication Services policy came into force on 1st October 2011 and replaced PSO 4400 Chapter 4 and PSI 06/2011. It is concerned with matters of prisoners’ communications and includes the prohibition of prisoners’ from accessing social networking sites. There are several forms of domestic legislation which grant power to the Secretary of State to pass policies regarding prisoner’s treatments and rights, including statutes and case law. The Human Rights Act 1998 and the European Court of Human Rights mean that this legislation is now more widely interpreted to make it compatible with Europe’s convention on human rights. There are advantages to the policy in PSI 49/100, for example it can protect public order and security and the…

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Lisbon Treaty

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Another function for the parliament is to make approval on the EU in alliance with the Council . For the European Council, despite the fact that it is not the main role without any new power, the Lisbon Treaty still recognizes it as an EU institution. After the Treaty was enforced, the European Council is directed by a president which can enhance the European Council’s role as an agenda-setter of the EU . Moving on to the Council of the EU, notwithstanding the alteration in regard to the majority voting and the making of decisions, they did not provide adequate and compelling remedies towards the control of the democratic decision making by a constitutional organ. Furthermore, it is important to know that only European Commission is capable to draft legislative proposals, which leads to a ‘democratic deficit’ problem towards the drafting as Lisbon Treaty did not propose any key alteration towards the ‘democratic deficit’ as to the Commission’s structure, functioning or powers…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Abstract The European Union of today is the result of a process that began over half a century ago with the creation of the European Coal and Steel Community. From that time, a durable peace has existed in the European continent for about 70 years. As we can see from the remarkable successes of the process of European integration today is significantly affected by the legislative procedures that apply to different policy fields. In fact, there were some thorny issues and crises took place with various reasons, mainly were intergovernmental issues, in the way of integration.…

    • 2859 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Judiciary is the section of government which is tasked with interpreting laws passed by parliament. In the USA the constitution established the Supreme Court under article 3 of the constitution. It is the ultimate authority in constitutional interpretation and its decisions can only be overturned by a constitutional amendment. In the UK, a supreme court was established in 2009 to provide greater clarity in the UK’s constitutional arrangements. In the UK, under the concept of Parliamentary Sovereignty, it is parliament which makes the laws but it is the courts who are tasked with interpreting them.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    As a consequence, we have a duty to obey the law but it can be overridden when we have a more pressing moral obligation . Furthermore, to reinforce my point of view I will rely on what Finnis advocated concerning that matter. He was also conscious that saying an unjust law is not a law is a contradiction, when he talked about the peripheral sense of law. Indeed, he explained that law has two senses. On the one hand, law has a focal meaning, “it describes rules which secure the common good by co-ordinating the different goods of individuals” .…

    • 2196 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Coercion Theory

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages

    II. Theory Policies diffuse in a multitude of ways at different rates for many reasons. Diffusion for this paper is defined as the spread of ideas, most often polices of political importance. While many theories surround this idea, this paper will focus on the idea of coercion.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics