Essay On Machiavelli's The Prince

Superior Essays
America, the richest country in the world, and the most successful lasting democracy. From 1776, the U.S. has withstood a Civil War, political turmoil, social injustice and much more. In The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli, he describes what makes a poor ruler versus what makes a great ruler. Even in a democracy like America, there are many similarities and differences between The Prince and the past two presidents in America. The United States has, also, followed parts of what Machiavelli has said; while it has also disregarded much of what Machiavelli has said. The Prince gives great advice to new nations that the U.S. has, inadvertently, adhered or disregarded depending on the situation. In history and modern day, there are many similarities …show more content…
One piece of advice that Machiavelli gives in his book is to, "...I say that it would be well to be reputed liberal," (Machiavelli, 74). While the Bush administration did not exactly follow this bit of advice since many Americans blame him for the economic downfall in 2008, the Obama administration has passed the Affordable Care Act. This has helped millions of people with no health insurance and those with insurance that does not pay for very much. Because of the Affordable Care Act, "...many fewer people will be underinsured," (Cohn, n.p.). This act that the Obama administration passed helped millions of American who didn 't have health care. As a result, many people, specifically the democrats and those who needed less expensive health care, were very pleased with it. However, there is no way one person can please every person within his/her state, so there are several Americans who weren 't satisfied with the Affordable Care Act, but a majority were. Consequently, Obama follows Machiavelli 's piece of advice quite …show more content…
He advises them on how to get, keep, and run a kingdom. Some of the guidance he gives does not even apply to the U.S, while the U.S. should take other parts of the book seriously. Machiavelli eloquently describes what someone should do if he wants to become a prince or is already a prince. While much of what Machiavelli wrote about was not meant for a republic like the U.S., it appears that many of the leaders in the U.S. have read his advice and followed through with it. Perhaps in the future, the leaders will look to it some more for help on running the United

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli wrote "The Qualities of the Prince" in July 1513 in Florence, Italy, to convey his idea of the strong, active, and perfect ruler to the current ruling the Medicis. The work is remembered and responsible for bringing “Machiavellian” into wide usage as a pejorative term. The essay takes a stringent position on the proper way to govern a nation. With a straightforward logic, a relevant idea, and an expressed method, Machiavelli’s “The Qualities of the Prince” is a practical guide for current…

    • 85 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli and Alvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca went through different experiences that led them to have their own perspectives in human nature and create their ideals for good governance. The simple fact that Cabeza de Vaca was unfortunate enough to have a hard time throughout the expedition made him more open minded about human nature, while Machiavelli had a set idea of what human nature was and how it ties to good governance. Machiavelli's view on human nature is the same as what is a good governance a good leader and a good human being is someone who knows how to be respected and feared without being hated and how that leads to have the people the Prince governs happy and on his side. Cabeza de Vaca has a more down to earth view on human nature but that differs…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The current 2016 presidential election season is one that has been marked by controversy and unconventional politics. Donald Trump, the Republican candidate, is not a politician, nor has he used the traditional practices of politicians during his campaign. Trump’s unlikely road to the Republican nomination has been questioned by common folk and political analysts alike. Some call Trump “insane,” some call him “brilliant,” but among the words tossed around to describe Trump, “Machiavellian” comes up quite a bit. Machiavellian refers to ideologies suggested in Niccolò Machiavelli’s The Prince.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socrates Is No Prince Socrates and Machiavelli lived in a time of political and civil disarray and chaos. Their thoughts on political philosophy and theory are a product of the times in which they lived. Through interpretations of their own political climate, Socrates and Machiavelli produced two schools of political thought that are incredibly different and contrasting. Plato’s Apology and Crito and Machiavelii’s The Prince present these two vastly disparate ideologies.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kemisa Kassa ID#003638997 Kemisa Kassa ID#003638997 In the beginning stages of this nation, it was established with the basic principles of “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness”. These principles are upheld by the constitution and overtime carried through tradition over time. Another tradition that was created was the hold on the main political parties, the Democratic, and the republican party, that has been a tradition and the third party hasn’t won an election in several decades. The division between the democrat and republican party encompasses the ideas of the American people.…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But what Niccolo didn't realize was that he created the guidelines of ruling for decades to come. Throughout the history of the United States, “The Prince” had influenced the majority of important men that…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the written work “The Prince” by Niccolo Machiavelli the author elaborates on how a prince can only be a strong leader if he engages in duplicity. Machiavelli focused on a more realistic and immoral strategy to keep the people of his time unified, realpolitik a system based on practical rather than moral considerations. The author, Niccolo Machiavelli, goes through great depths to explain why it takes rulers who are “cruel, dishonest, duplicitous, and manipulative.” There are many great examples to prove his ideology, however, the writing is very subjective and bias as Machiavelli does not give a rebuttal to the different kinds of ruling. He writes “The Prince” after the current leading family of his time falls in order to keep the stability…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Machiavelli and Socrates both lived during times of uncertainty, political fragmentation and violence, their philosophies about how the state should conduct itself are in direct contrast with one another. Machiavelli’s the Prince is founded on the principal that if a ruler wishes to maintain power, he should embody the ideology of pragmatism, while Socrates believes the state should follow him in his commitment to moral purity and justice. The inherent dissonance between these philosophies would lead Socrates to be unsupportive of Machiavelli’s concept of a prince, and consequently the political system Machiavelli would recommend he install, despite his apparent change in rhetoric from the Apology to the Crito. Throughout Plato’s interpretation…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An explanation that is potentially one of the more conventional validations of the relationship between Machiavelli’s The Prince and the Discourses is reading The Prince as a manual for the founder of what would eventually emerge as a republic. Once the prince has established a foundation of the state, the republic that Machiavelli advocates for in the Discourses will become achievable and desirable. The Prince was written to establish a unified state; the republic in the Discourses will maintain that stable and unified state. Academic Leo Strauss explains that Machiavelli wrote the Discourses to promote the imitation of ancient republics. Machiavelli longed for the rebirth of ancient republicanism .…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The lion cannot protect himself from traps, and the fox cannot defend himself from wolves. One must therefore be a fox to recognize traps, and a lion to frighten wolves.” Machiavelli uses this analogy as an attempt to teach the masses how to embrace their human significance. Machiavelli wrote The Prince at a time where there was political unrest and confusion in Italy, which is why it can be interpreted in many different ways, such as a political satire or epilogue of his political views; however, while the content may be confusing the true meaning of The Prince is to be understood as a satire. Machiavelli is continuously sarcastic through out the course of the novel about the government standings and the changing world.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He suggests that since U. S. leaders have the power, they think that it gives them an inherent right to employ it on others. With this said, he says that empires do not just pursue power for power’s sake, but in fact that we are interested in gaining from them. Often times, countries perceived as poor and weak are actually quite rich with product and market but the people in the countries are poor because we exploit and pillage them. This is the imperial lie. In the eyes of Western Imperialists, countries need to stay at the level which they were at originally.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Prince, in contrast, is a tyranny and bares tension with republicanism. A tyranny is exactly what is identified as a bad counterpart in the Discourses. This distinction does strain the potential relationship between the two texts, yet this is only validated if the two texts are read in mutual exclusion and without the consideration of external historical…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “All states or dominions which hold or have held sway over mankind are either republics or monarchies” (Machiavelli, 5). Machiavelli states that both monarchies and republics are the most widespread, used forms of government; however, as Machiavelli critiques the way monarchies are run, specifically in Florence under the Medici family, The Prince highlights how republics could be more beneficial. Although The Prince, by Niccolò Machiavelli, discusses both forms of government, the text is still largely relevant to contemporary society. One example of this is that the overall ideas from the text are still practiced in modern politics and culture, fiction and nonfiction. Furthermore, Machiavelli predicted the outcome of fallen monarchies, which…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In many political philosopher’s eyes, there is a special relationship between the ideas of moral goodness and legitimate authority. Some of these political philosophers believed that the use of political power was only morally correct if it was exercised under a ruler who had virtuous morals. These rulers who had virtuous morals were then told that in order to be successful, they needed to make decisions in accordance with the standards of ethical goodness. This moralistic view of authority is what Machiavelli criticizes in his work “The Prince.” In Machiavelli’s book, “The Prince,” the readers are introduced to political values that do not necessarily give full recognition to morality or religion.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First and foremost, he must be wise; seek advice when needed, but always with a grain of salt. He shall avoid hatred and contempt since this could damage his respect and cause his people to revolt against him. He must be brave and strong, as this is a must for any man in general to succeed and be great. He should, if possible, be both loved and feared; if not loved, then feared. He must understand and know the art of war like the palm of his hand.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays