The Philosophy Of Equality 7-2521 's Sin Essay

1020 Words 5 Pages
The Explicative Philosophy of Equality 7-2521’s Sin Equality 7-2521’s initial assessment that his mind was saturated with sin, was an incessant and learned ideology. In fact, it was the nucleus of his entire being. In the novella, Anthem, there was a single moral principle that all humans lived by; All are equal ––anything or anyone who does not follow this principle was a transgressor. The dystopian society’s definition or psychology of sin is an extreme inverse reflection of what Ayn Rand felt the idea of collectivism was doing to Humanity. Equality’s eventual assessment of his sin is correct, because no person is morally obligated to any other person. He is essentially the heir to the transgressor, who used the Unspeakable word. The key, is that Equality realized that yearning to be an individual is not a sin, but a blessing. The collectivism versus individualism theme plays an enormous part in the reason for why Equality’s realization is correct. Before coming to the conclusion of not being a sinner, he essentially realized his world was corrupted by collectivism. Moreover, the discussion of the duty assignment process; the act of maintaining the collectivism. Equality’s curiosity, philosophical ways, and overall his symbolic representations of individualism and his acceptance of it. Therefore, the power of Anthem’s dystopian law–––collectivism itself. The collectivism, was a result of an event called the Great Rebirth. A Renaissance for…

Related Documents