Different arguments support different things and if there was a God different characteristics. Such as the ontological argument which is one of the arguments I will be doing, tries to prove that if there is a God he will be the perfect human being. Which is hard to believe because us as humans sin multiple times a day with out even trying sometimes. The teleological argument, tries proves the existence of a creator that concerns its morality (an or Race.). The argument of Atheism which is the other argument I am going will try to explain if there where was a God why would there be people on earth like Atheist. …show more content…
Anselm. He starts with the assumption that the experience for their justice. Then goes on by pure logic that means that God exist.The Ontological Argument is an Argument used to prove God’s Existence through ideal reasoning alone. This argument is based on a reason for evidence. The argument begins with an explanation of the belief of God, and from there it tries to give us the image of God exists on Concepts. Most Arguments for the existence of God rely on first hand assumptions. For example the “fine tuning” rely on the first hand assumptions of intelligent design. So life could not have been as developed if certain properties of the universe were different in little ways from what they