John Locke Vs Hobbes Research

The nature of state is a theory that was developed to understand the workings of human nature without a state. John Locke (1632-1704) and Thomas Hobbes (1588- 1679) are both philosophers who examined the idea of the creation and reason of society and government. Both of them studied the nature of man and came up with conclusions as to how violence must be stopped by the government in power. Both had varying opinions and approaches to this idea yet they aimed for the same goal. In this paper, I will explore the similarities and differences between the two philosophers. Hobbes’ Leviathan was written first as Locke came 50 years after him. Locke is shown to borrow the concepts from him and take a different approach towards things in Second Treatise of Government. Hobbes believed that people are selfish. This characteristic in people can cause massive outbreak in terms of killing one another. Since people would want to achieve their needs they would have this urge of being …show more content…
Since it’s important to protect the people and their needs, they should choose the necessary to protect their rights to life. Locke explains the importance of the economy in relationship to man its activities in daily life. According to him, men are laborers who then gain property that should be looked after and it should not be misused. People earn money via land trading but according to Locke people should understand that they should not waste any commodity, hence if it is misused the punishments come into play. Unlike Hobbes and his viewpoint at looking at one’s violence, Locke explains the laws under which these circumstances can be looked over rather than hoping for the government to take action. The simple way according to him would be to have the people who own the land to create the