What Is The Difference Between John Locke And Thomas Hobbes

The concept of the social contract theory has been the creation of one government with the people and a contract written with policies and laws but, if the government breaks the contract then the people has the right to make another new government with a new contract. This is a theory benefits citizens and people when government only works when they are protecting the humans rights. Thomas Hobbes theory was that people needed to be ruled by one, either a king or queen because they don’t know the good and bad of decisions and that if people get to do what they want then chaos will be released. Hobbes believed people had no rights and should be ruled by one which was called monarchy. Thomas believed that human needed government only for protection …show more content…
John Locke and Thomas Hobbes had very opposite theories. Thomas Hobbes idea was very different from the natural law but John Locke’s idea was close and similar to the natural law. Locke’s theory was the efficiency of getting what the people want. John Locke might have followed the philosophy of Thomas Hobbes and cooperated to a different theory but his theory is the better understanding of the nature of …show more content…
Each of the benchmarks has its own unique meaning which helps brings together a democratic society. The first benchmark of a democratic society is popular sovereignty. This is the benchmarks that defines that the government is controlled by what the people wants and to be successful in a democratic society it has to do what the majority of the people vote on. The people can decide and participate in the government for it to be a democratic society. The second benchmark is Government Leaders are selected in Competitive Elections. This benchmark means to be in a democratic society, the people have to choose a leader or a representative to represent them and lead the people the way they want. It is the compete of finding the leader who will listen to the people and often times what the leader does for the community and the people will effect this competition. The third benchmark is Elections are free and fair. This is the rule and law that allows any of the people are able to be a representative leader and officer and that the people are all allowed to vote for what they want and who they want. Also, the rule that voters are counted precisely and correctly and no election officials can put others higher or lower from others in the election. The fourth benchmark is people participate in the political process, meaning that for the democratic society to work people have to participate in the government process.