Essay about The National Basketball Association Vs Donald Sterling

1555 Words Apr 21st, 2016 7 Pages
The definition of freedom of speech under the First Amendment is the ability for people to express their opinion freely without any consequences. It is supported by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The amendment provides that Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech or the press. The free speech controversy that this paper will be about is the National Basketball Association vs Donald Sterling.
Sterling said some racist remarks in the phone conversation with his girlfriend V. Stiviano that she recorded in September of 2013. He talked about not wanting any black people coming to any of his games (Cacciola, S.; Witz, B., 2014, n.p.). He was banned from the NBA for life, fined 2.5 million dollars and was forced to sell the Clippers by commissioner Adam Silver for his bigoted remarks (Gittens, 2014, n.p.) He took the punishment to the California Second Court of Appeals in which the judges ruled against him in that he had to sell the team.
Sterling was the owner of the Los Angeles Clippers at the time he made the comments. The free speech concepts that this controversy involves is hate speech. If this was a Supreme Court case, the judges will likely rule for Sterling. There is an appropriate stance to take on this issue. This controversy is very significant because Sterling has a reputation of making racially insensitive comments. The who of this free speech controversy is Donald Sterling. Donald Sterling was a businessman in real estate, an…

Related Documents