The Importance Of The Tallmadge Amendment

Superior Essays
In the year 1819, there was a balance of power within the nation because there were

exactly 11 free states and 11 slave states. Missouri, however, wanted statehood, which created

problems because that would make the balance of power unequal. James Tallmadge, Jr. proposed

what came to be known as the “Tallmadge Amendment,” which disallowed slaves’ owners from

bringing new ones into Missouri, and also allowed children of slaves to be freed when they

turned 25. This was approved by the House of Representatives, where the Northerners had a

majority, but rejected by the Senate. Maine came into this situation when they wanted to be their

own state, requesting to be in the Union. Senate saw this opportunity to fulfill an equal number
…show more content…
This separated what could be

slave states and free states, free being in the North and slave states being in the South (except

Missouri).

Despite this resolution, there was a newly-developed problem that emerged. Members of

the Missouri constitutional convention who did not oppose slavery banned African Americans

who were free from getting into the state by wanting to include it in the constitution. Henry Clay

played an important role at this time by convincing the Missouri legislature to not put that in the

constitution. This almost stopped Missouri’s admission to the Union. The Missouri Compromise

was not a permanent solution to the nation’s issues with slavery. All it did was temporarily

postpone the problems revolving around slavery and push them aside.

2. Andrew Jackson, a president of the common man, was very important because he

believed democracy was key, so the majority should be ruled in it. With his presidency, the

United States really saw how democratic reality was becoming especially because he set most of

the stage for the Democratic party we have today. He also thought normal citizens should
…show more content…
Jackson thought the national Bank was

unconstitutional and that it only helped the wealthy. He was not fond of paper money because it

was not backed by gold and silver and he was suspicious of the power they had. He purposely

weakened the Bank by strengthening the state government. Because of him, a new opposing

party, the Whigs, was created. Even though he had many achievements in office and had ideas

that shaped the country, Andrew Jackson was still not that great of a president. This is because

overall he did not really try his best to make more rights for the people, but restricted many. Due

to him being exposed to and involved in war at such a young age, he used what he learned in war

in his presidency and for evil (most of his responses to things were to fight, and he also killed a

man in a duel). He also was known for being a president of the common man and for the people,

but he owned slaves who were African Americans. He made the Native Americans move,

through the Indian Removal Act, just because his attitude towards them, obvious throughout his

early presidency especially in his Inaugural Address, was negative. He also did this because

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Malcolm X Dbq Analysis

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He wanted equal rights but by being separate from whites. He said that a nice white person should work for equal rights on their side while blacks work in their community (Doc. C). His feeling towards schools is the same books and curriculum. (Doc. E). With the schools segregated blacks have the right to learn and work without struggle of not being welcome into current schools with whites. Being separated helps with violence and doesn't cost as many people as boycotting or marches.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Jackson, a strong-willed, stubborn, selfish man who only listened to himself and ignored the opinions of others, won his way into presidency during the election of 1828. Throughout his presidency Andrew Jackson made some horrible choices, that affected the country in negative ways. People were killed, orders were ignored, laws were broken, amendments were violated, all because of the choices he made. Even before his presidency he was a cruel man, that deserved punishment. Thomas Jefferson states that Andrew Jackson “could never speak on account of the rashness of his feelings. I have seen him attempt it repeatedly, and as often choke with rage…. He is a dangerous man.” (Meltzer 1993)…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Passed by Congress in may of 1854, the Kansas Nebraska Act may be the most significant of the Pre-Civil War compromises. It admitted the Kansas and Nebraska as states, but rather than decide whether the territories would become slave or non-slave states based on their location in relation to the 36’ 30° line, they were allowed to choose for themselves. Kansas and Nebraska were not the only ones allowed to decide though, each territory was allowed to choose for itself if it would be a slave or non-slave state. This allowing of territories to choose slave or non-slave is called popular sovereignty. In popular sovereignty the people of the territory vote to decide if they will become a slave state or a non-slave state. The north was extremely offended by this because it violated the the 36’ 30° line, which had been created by the Missouri…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His use of the spoils system effectively polluted the government. Rather than replace seats with those that could actually help American relations, he removed government officials from office and replaced them with corrupt friends and acquaintances to gain political power and favors for himself. As a presidency, favoritism should never rule your decision to put into place new political figures. By doing so, he showed his ability to strengthen the power of the president and remove the say so of the states, something that was selfish and did more harm than…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Jackson the 7th president of the United States America, often called King Jackson. Jackson was from the Democratic party and raised in the south. Famous for the spoils system which gives government jobs to government supporters. During Jackson’s presidency there was more than usual controversy if he was a good president or not. I believe that Andrew Jackson was not a good president, he didn't follow orders. Jackson went against the Supreme court case Worcester v. Georgia in the removal of the Cherokee Indians from their land in Georgia. Jackson stopped anti-slavery literature from going to the south which violates the 1 st amendment.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    in the United States led to the passing of the nineteenth amendment which guaranteed the rights…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But, he was giving more power to the richer people because they were getting more money. With more money, they could get more land and the poor people wouldn’t have land to build houses or farm on. Jackson also paid off the federal debt. Which Presidents don’t normally have a chance to do that. This made American citizens pay less taxes then what they had to before2. Andrew Jackson did things that benefited the country.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One can say he was very democratic. His intentions were to go to any length to please the majority of the American people, though Jackson for the most part demonstrated democratic concepts, often times he would stray from them, crossing the line of democracy. Understanding Andrew Jackson and democracy is important today because the significance of the policies mentioned and others that Jackson had have impacted America in a big way. We should care about this because it set the foundation for the balancing of power within the social classes and voting…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He won in the battle of New Orleans and he was a popular person in the government ever since. He was later elected as president in 1828 were he was known as the people´s president. He founded the democrat party and promoted individual liberty. That is why people loved him and one of the many reasons why he was elected as president. If he didn’t win the battle in New Orleans he probably would not have been president and well known in American history. When he was younger he was captured by the British along with his brother. While he was held captive he got permanent scars due to lacerations in his face and hand. While they were both in captivity they got smallpox. Smallpox is a deadly disease if not treated in time and is very painful. His brother did not make it once he got smallpox. He ended up dying in British…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Jackson made more controversial decisions than most presidents during his time in office. He had his successes and failures as president of the United States and he left a lasting impact on American politics. Overall, his decisions were popular due to American idealism at the time. He was, after all, considered "the people 's president.”…

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Even though Andrew Jackson almost doubled the amount of people who voted, was nice to Native Americans at first, and gave most people more power in the government, which are all very democratic things because these things give power to the people and all of this was known as the Jacksonian Democracy. (Doc A, D, J) He did many undemocratic things to gain presidency and when he was president such as abuse his power to veto the national…

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many of the decisions that Jackson made were based strongly on his different background. We see this in his strong opposition to the national bank and also see how his personal life intermingled itself in this affair. Nicholas Biddle, the wellborn president of the national bank, was everything that Jackson was not and therefore was a strong enemy to Jackson. Due to this, Jackson made it a goal of his presidency to close the national bank. Andrew also felt this system benefited the northern industry more than the southern farmers. Jackson began to do this by starving the bank by moving millions of dollars from the bank to the individual state banks. When Henry Clay accelerated the deadline of the bank’s charter’s renewal, Jackson vetoed it. The effects of this were widespread; America later fell into a depression that lasted six years. Much of this was rooted in that banks lost trust without gold backing in the currency. Jackson attempted to fix the problem by passing the Specie Circular, requiring land purchasers to pay in gold coins or specie. But due to the general lack of gold, many banks were forced to close and thus brought America deeper into depression. Many people lost their money and trade slowed tremendously without the exchange vector the National Bank had served. Andrew Jackson had done this mainly to benefit the southern farmers who couldn’t get loans for land, but ended up hurting the entire economy as well as the rest of the nation, creating problems for many presidents to come. The majority of the north hated Jackson for these reasons. Jackson also passed a tariff or a tax on exports. Southern farmers were aghast at this, as it would make it much harder to sell their goods and would also lower their profit margin, which already was extremely small. Jackson had intended to increase manufacturing and the…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He believed the people should have their right to express their opinion through voting because the United States is a democracy and people need to have their vote count. Voter discrimination (gerrymandering) was something he intervened in. For example in the case of, Graves v. Barnes, which was a state legislative reapportionment. This case was about the apportionment of the senatorial districts in Harris County and it was due to racial discrimination. During the trial the plaintiffs gave materials which included reapportionment plans which would be useful for the judges that were on the case. Judge Justice (along with the other judges) found that The Legislative Redistricting Board did not take redistricting seriously, but instead they did what they wanted. Another issue that was brought up in the case was the multimember districts in Dallas and Bexar. Representatives in these districts are elected but minorities seem to be underrepresented. The Legislative Redistricting Board had the lines drawn so there could be political success. The decision that was made brought controversy so this case was brought to the U.S. Supreme Court (White v. Regester) in which they agreed with the court’s decision. The case of Graves v. Barnes got rid of multimember districts. This allowed for African Americans and Mexican-American citizens the proper right to contribute to the elections and even hold…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    early Presidents of the United States were members of the Whig Party. Along with the…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He thought because he was rich he was powerful and thought he could get away with anything or gets what he wants…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays